Towers B/C

Locked
hearthstone224
Member
Member
Posts: 132
Joined: October 13th, 2016, 1:50 pm
Division: C
State: IL
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Towers B/C

Post by hearthstone224 »

Sorry, I don't know what gr is. I did a quick google search and it said "grains", is that right? I didn't weigh my balsa piece when I was using it. Although I know it is 1/8*1/8*36 balsa.

Are you measuring in grams when you say " The steady readings I got, w/ about a cm of bowing, were 37.80, 38.25, 39.80, and 41.05.= 39.33 average", since I got like 75 grams (and I didn't take your approach, I will make sure to do that 4 faces thing next time, thanks :) ) But yeah, grams? Since if I only bow like 1cm the number will fluctuate and I can't get a reading. Only when I bend it somewhat far (and I'll try to take a picture to post on here so you can judge) the number will stay still..

Anyways I went to my team today and showed them your info... They were confused and I had to explain BS and all that stuff.. :lol:

Was a lot of fun, the meet today.
End of freshman season. Good luck to everyone! No state for us, but nevertheless great season. Regional was out of 12 teams. (CLC)

Mat Sci-> Second at regionals
RSensing -> First at regionals
Towers-> Third at regionals.
Balsa Man
Coach
Coach
Posts: 1318
Joined: November 13th, 2008, 3:01 am
Division: C
State: CO
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Towers B/C

Post by Balsa Man »

hearthstone224 wrote:Sorry, I don't know what gr is. I did a quick google search and it said "grains", is that right? I didn't weigh my balsa piece when I was using it. Although I know it is 1/8*1/8*36 balsa.

Are you measuring in grams when you say " The steady readings I got, w/ about a cm of bowing, were 37.80, 38.25, 39.80, and 41.05.= 39.33 average", since I got like 75 grams (and I didn't take your approach, I will make sure to do that 4 faces thing next time, thanks :) ) But yeah, grams? Since if I only bow like 1cm the number will fluctuate and I can't get a reading. Only when I bend it somewhat far (and I'll try to take a picture to post on here so you can judge) the number will stay still..

Anyways I went to my team today and showed them your info... They were confused and I had to explain BS and all that stuff.. :lol:

Was a lot of fun, the meet today.
gr is grams
I think just a difference in ....hand technique. When its bowed and reading steady; I can get that in the 1/2 to 1cm range, takes a little more for you, no big deal. As I said, the key is doing it consistently; whatever works for you
Len Joeris
Fort Collins, CO
hearthstone224
Member
Member
Posts: 132
Joined: October 13th, 2016, 1:50 pm
Division: C
State: IL
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Towers B/C

Post by hearthstone224 »

Awesome! Then I'll employ your strategy and see how it goes soon!
End of freshman season. Good luck to everyone! No state for us, but nevertheless great season. Regional was out of 12 teams. (CLC)

Mat Sci-> Second at regionals
RSensing -> First at regionals
Towers-> Third at regionals.
hearthstone224
Member
Member
Posts: 132
Joined: October 13th, 2016, 1:50 pm
Division: C
State: IL
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Towers B/C

Post by hearthstone224 »

It seems like the B division tower has more potential, since I calculated the multipliers for each bracing up to 1/7 for C division, and the highest was only 120.76x in the 1/7th bracing interval compared to like 150x for B division. But this is because of the B leg being shorter, isn't it?

Is it fine if I just rounded the way you did, should that be accurate enough?

Also, when we calculate the BS down for let's say 1/7th bracing interval, what will that mean? Does that mean once we brace a stick of length 61.343 at a 1/7th interval and add another stick to hold it, it should be able to hold X grams?

And what is the number 61.343 referring to again? Since at one point the tower will curve outwards, right? To elaborate, the leg refers to the straight part of the "skinny pyramid" design, or the whole leg? It's hard to ask this question.
End of freshman season. Good luck to everyone! No state for us, but nevertheless great season. Regional was out of 12 teams. (CLC)

Mat Sci-> Second at regionals
RSensing -> First at regionals
Towers-> Third at regionals.
Balsa Man
Coach
Coach
Posts: 1318
Joined: November 13th, 2008, 3:01 am
Division: C
State: CO
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Towers B/C

Post by Balsa Man »

OK, hearthstone 224, catching up on one of your posts I hadn't responded to:

1. Confirmation- The way you measure buckling strength is the number you get when it starts to stay still, right? It will reach a certain threshold, and that's the number we want? It doesn't matter how far it is bending as long as the bottom is staying still?

Because I have a piece of 1/8x1/8x36 balsa wood that stays still at around 75 grams, and I thought I would roll with that since it is above your number of 60g.

As discussed, yes. If you have 4 sticks that test out at 75gr at 36”, and build with a 1/5 bracing interval, you should be fine. Looking at our inverse square table, legs from those pieces should have a BS of 5,921; that’s a very comfortable/conservative safety factor over the 3,840 force each leg will be seeing at a 15 kg load. That’ll give you some margin to handle ….less than perfect building technique; a good idea for someone who is not an experienced builder.

1a. When we say that the BS of a stick at a braced interval of, oh say 1/3 interval is 2000g (just making it up), would that refer to the strength of the structure after we attach whatever kind of braces we want (say X) and then put another stick next to it? What is that BS referring to?

Yes, because bracing turns a long column into a set of shorter ‘stacked columns’, so the BS of the long, braced column becomes that of the shorter, stacked/braced columns. Don’t understand what you mean about, “then you put another stick next to it.” When the bracing is all installed on the tower, all 4 legs are braced, and have the BS of the braced interval. If you put together/use the table I provided the set of columns for, and look at the values for 1/3 interval bracing for a 51.546cm long leg, you’ll see that a 36” stick, with a tested BS at 36” of 70gr will, when braced at the 1/3 points, provide a BS of 1,989gr (28.42 times the BS at 36”)- pretty close to your 2000 figure.

2. When you state the leg length for the whole thing (C division) is 61.343cm, what is that referring to? And how did you get that number? Basically, a bit of elaboration on "leg length", whatever it is, would be very helpful. It sounds pretty basic but I just want to make sure.

Leg length is….the length of the legs. As described many times previously, the leg length I’m talking about is for a tower that has the legs at the bottom (sitting on the test base) far enough apart to clear the 29cm circle by 3mm on all sides, and is 3mm higher than the minimum height in the rules. The number for the leg length is simple geometry- Pythagorean Theorem; a sqared + b squared = c squared….


3. I'm not sure how I'm going to construct this. Like say I figured the sticks I want to use, and then I make my X braces. But how do I connect I part of it to the other? That is what I don't get. Also, how do I connect part of a tower to the base such that it doesn't make a weak point? Maybe I'm just worrying to far into the future but I'd just like to know the plan for that part.

Sorry, I’m having trouble understanding….what you’re not understanding. In simplest terms, at your braced points- whatever interval you end up using- and the points should be carefully measured and marked on your legs before they’re taped to the jig, ready to put the bracing on to hold the legs together, and brace them- you put ‘ladder’ pieces in between the legs- the ends of the ladder pieces butt tightly up against the inside edges of both legs; the ends will need to be carefully cut at an angle that matches the angle at which the legs slope in. These ladders are what hold the legs together, and brace them into shorter intervals. Then you’ll need some sort of diagonal bracing between each set of ladders, Xs or ‘Z’ bracing. I’ll try to get a detailed description of the ‘ladders and Xs’ approach we use posted later today….
As to ‘how to construct’, a) take some time to look at photos in the image gallery of towers, and b) once you have a jig, it will be easy to see how to construct.
As to ‘connect part of the tower to the base’, as I said earlier, with this year’s rules, there is no/should be no lower/base part, with a thin chimney part extending up from it. You want straight legs, forming a single truncated pyramid- wide enough at the base to clear the 29cm circle, narrow enough at the top to fit under the load block; very simple.


Then your most recent one:
hearthstone224 wrote:It seems like the B division tower has more potential, since I calculated the multipliers for each bracing up to 1/7 for C division, and the highest was only 120.76x in the 1/7th bracing interval compared to like 150x for B division. But this is because of the B leg being shorter, isn't it?

Yes, that's correct- 1/7th of 51+cm is shorter than 1/7th of 61+

Is it fine if I just rounded the way you did, should that be accurate enough?

Yes-- provided multiple decimal places just cause that's whats in the spreadsheet


Also, when we calculate the BS down for let's say 1/7th bracing interval, what will that mean? Does that mean once we brace a stick of length 61.343 at a 1/7th interval and add another stick to hold it, it should be able to hold X grams?

Not sure what you mean "add another stick to hold it" I think I covered this above, but not sure. Bracing connects adjacent legs; with bracing in on all four sides, all legs are braced, and the buckling strengths of the legs are the buckling strength of the equal, short braced intervals

And what is the number 61.343 referring to again? Since at one point the tower will curve outwards, right? To elaborate, the leg refers to the straight part of the "skinny pyramid" design, or the whole leg? It's hard to ask this question.

61.343 is, as stated, the length of the leg(s) of a C-Div tower with 3mm clearance of the 29cm circle at the bottom, and the top supporting the 5cm square load block. I explained where that number comes from. Nothing "curves out"- not the tower, not the legs; the legs are all straight; the 4 legs together form a truncated pyramid- they are connected together by bracing.


And thanks Balsa Man your explanation on the reason why we don't cut down the stick when measuring BS really helped me. I get it now why we don't cut it down, that would be impossible to use then

Yup.
Len Joeris
Fort Collins, CO
User avatar
Unome
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 4327
Joined: January 26th, 2014, 12:48 pm
Division: Grad
State: GA
Has thanked: 231 times
Been thanked: 83 times

Re: Towers B/C

Post by Unome »

hearthstone224 wrote:And what is the number 61.343 referring to again? Since at one point the tower will curve outwards, right? To elaborate, the leg refers to the straight part of the "skinny pyramid" design, or the whole leg? It's hard to ask this question.
I think you're using examples from previous years as your mental picture (such as this). Because of a rule change for this year, competitive towers will look more like this.
Userpage

Opinions expressed on this site are not official; the only place for official rules changes and FAQs is soinc.org.
Balsa Man
Coach
Coach
Posts: 1318
Joined: November 13th, 2008, 3:01 am
Division: C
State: CO
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Towers B/C

Post by Balsa Man »

OK, one more long post on important basic concepts. This one is on bracing between the legs. Previous write-up, and extensive follow-on discussion on what bracing is all about- bracing a long, floppy piece of wood (low buckling strength) into 'stacked' shorter sections with high enough buckling strength to carry our 'design load.' It's just a copy of a write-up I've done for a team I'm working with this year, and worked with last year on bridges. A description of the approach to bracing that has worked well for us over the years: here it is, as attachment (hopefully this works, first time trying to attach a file to a post:
Len Joeris
Fort Collins, CO
Balsa Man
Coach
Coach
Posts: 1318
Joined: November 13th, 2008, 3:01 am
Division: C
State: CO
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Towers B/C

Post by Balsa Man »

Unome wrote:
hearthstone224 wrote:And what is the number 61.343 referring to again? Since at one point the tower will curve outwards, right? To elaborate, the leg refers to the straight part of the "skinny pyramid" design, or the whole leg? It's hard to ask this question.
I think you're using examples from previous years as your mental picture (such as this). Because of a rule change for this year, competitive towers will look more like this.
YES, exactly! Thanks much for the pics 8-)
Len Joeris
Fort Collins, CO
hearthstone224
Member
Member
Posts: 132
Joined: October 13th, 2016, 1:50 pm
Division: C
State: IL
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Towers B/C

Post by hearthstone224 »

Yeah, those pictures were spot on, now I got it. :D

Sorry balsa man i was confused because that pyramid design was what was in my mind the whole time.
End of freshman season. Good luck to everyone! No state for us, but nevertheless great season. Regional was out of 12 teams. (CLC)

Mat Sci-> Second at regionals
RSensing -> First at regionals
Towers-> Third at regionals.
Balsa Man
Coach
Coach
Posts: 1318
Joined: November 13th, 2008, 3:01 am
Division: C
State: CO
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Towers B/C

Post by Balsa Man »

hearthstone224 wrote:Yeah, those pictures were spot on, now I got it. :D

Sorry balsa man i was confused because that pyramid design was what was in my mind the whole time.
Hey, nothing to be sorry about; as you said in your first post, this is all new to you, and as you're finding out, there's a lot to be learned. You're doing that well. :D
Len Joeris
Fort Collins, CO
Locked

Return to “Towers B/C”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests