Michigan 2010

User avatar
packer-backer91
Member
Member
Posts: 199
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 6:51 pm
Division: Grad
State: MI
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Michigan 2010

Post by packer-backer91 »

Bogoradwee wrote:I'm pretty upset with the results from regionals. we got first last year, but this year we got third, and only the top two teams are going to states this year, but last year it was the top 3...

at least at your Reginal two teams [or sometimes three] can go to state, in my Reginonal its win or go home with only the top C team getting to go to State. Which is defently a bad thing because every year my school has a few kids that deside they will do nothing to prepare for there event and get first at Reginonals then get 40th at State resulting in bad team placing.

I also think at our state that they should bring back the class State Champs. So they should announce the overall Div B & C teams then also say who where the top schools in each class [A,B,C,D].
Image
Favorite Events: Experimental Design, Scrambler, Mousetrap Vehicle
Thanks Science Olympiad for the 6 Great Years!
Don't cry because it's over, smile because it happened. ― Dr. Seuss
winneratlife
Member
Member
Posts: 335
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 3:52 pm
Division: Grad
State: MI
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Michigan 2010

Post by winneratlife »

packer-backer91 wrote:
Bogoradwee wrote:I'm pretty upset with the results from regionals. we got first last year, but this year we got third, and only the top two teams are going to states this year, but last year it was the top 3...

at least at your Reginal two teams [or sometimes three] can go to state, in my Reginonal its win or go home with only the top C team getting to go to State. Which is defently a bad thing because every year my school has a few kids that deside they will do nothing to prepare for there event and get first at Reginonals then get 40th at State resulting in bad team placing.

I also think at our state that they should bring back the class State Champs. So they should announce the overall Div B & C teams then also say who where the top schools in each class [A,B,C,D].
5 move on in my region... Wow...
lucwilder42 wrote:what kind of efficiencies are people getting for elevated bridge?
Go ask in the elevated bridge forum. But from me, bad ones (not that I'm any indicator)
packer-backer91 wrote:thats good to see that there are some new schools that will be at state. Did anyone see a team that always makes it to State not this year?
DCDS was in top ten last year, but I don't think they made it this year.
User avatar
packer-backer91
Member
Member
Posts: 199
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 6:51 pm
Division: Grad
State: MI
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Michigan 2010

Post by packer-backer91 »

anyone know when they will put out the list with team numbers of all the teams that made it?
Image
Favorite Events: Experimental Design, Scrambler, Mousetrap Vehicle
Thanks Science Olympiad for the 6 Great Years!
Don't cry because it's over, smile because it happened. ― Dr. Seuss
User avatar
Bogoradwee
Member
Member
Posts: 117
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 1:47 pm
Division: Grad
State: MI
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Michigan 2010

Post by Bogoradwee »

5 move on in my region... Wow...
That's.... like a tenth of the total teams at states.... there's a little over 50, right?
Science Olympiad: Guessing and BSing our way to victory!
Btw, if you see me in IRC chat, I'm Exothermic
2009: I don't remember/ not very noteworthy.
2010: See above.
2011: Regionals- 3rd WIDI, 3rd Optics, 3rd Fossils, 3rd overall States- 4th WIDI
winneratlife
Member
Member
Posts: 335
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 3:52 pm
Division: Grad
State: MI
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Michigan 2010

Post by winneratlife »

Bogoradwee wrote:
5 move on in my region... Wow...
That's.... like a tenth of the total teams at states.... there's a little over 50, right?
Idk...

I live in Oakland though, and between the tri-county, we ought to have like at the very least a quarter of the state's population...
User avatar
Glacial_Overfreeze
Member
Member
Posts: 5
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 7:10 am
Division: C
State: MI
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Michigan 2010

Post by Glacial_Overfreeze »

winneratlife wrote:
Bogoradwee wrote:
5 move on in my region... Wow...
That's.... like a tenth of the total teams at states.... there's a little over 50, right?
Idk...

I live in Oakland though, and between the tri-county, we ought to have like at the very least a quarter of the state's population...
Same here, it's our first time going to states. XD
Thanks to the top 5 thing ... still, that's a lot.
2010 Events
Main - Ornithology (1st @ Regionals)
Experimental Design
User avatar
JustDroobles
Member
Member
Posts: 164
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 3:28 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Michigan 2010

Post by JustDroobles »

Well, what fraction of your teams go on to state? For Division C we have 6 teams go on to state in Region 12, out of 25. In Division B, 10 teams go out of about 40 to 50.
jander14indoor
Member
Member
Posts: 1598
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 7:54 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 10 times

Re: Michigan 2010

Post by jander14indoor »

MI state invites, no mystery, and not necessarily related to population covered. This is the policy in MI, can't speak for other states.

There are 48 slots each in Div B and C. They are distributed to the regionals based on paid team memberships at the regional vs the total paid teams in the state in your division on a given day.

So, lets say your regional has 40 teams in Div B and 30 in Div C. There are 400 teams in div B statewide, and 450 in Div C. Div B gets 48*40/400 or 4.8 invites, normally rounded to 5. Div C gets 48*30/450 or 3.2 invites, again, rounded to 3.

So its the regions with lots of teams participating, not lots of nonparticipating native population, that get more invites.

Note, no regional gets less than one, though if that small it might be combined with another region at some point.

Hope that's clear. Note, even if your region stays the same size from one year to the next, it may get a different number of invites depending on the total state teams. Vice versa, growing or shrinking only changes invites based on total state teams.

National invites are similar. They have 60 slots. Each state gets one, then the largest states (by team count again) get an extra invite till they are all distributed. The largest couple of states get two each for Div B and C. Further down, some states might get two div B and one C, or vice versa, depending on relative team membership in that team division.

Jeff Anderson
Livonia, MI
User avatar
JustDroobles
Member
Member
Posts: 164
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 3:28 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Michigan 2010

Post by JustDroobles »

jander14indoor wrote:So, lets say your regional has 40 teams in Div B and 30 in Div C. There are 400 teams in div B statewide, and 450 in Div C. Div B gets 48*40/400 or 4.8 invites, normally rounded to 5. Div C gets 48*30/450 or 3.2 invites, again, rounded to 3.
My region has 25 C teams. 48*25/450 = 2.667... but we get 6 invites to state. Maybe they were generous and rounded 2.667 up to 6?
jander14indoor
Member
Member
Posts: 1598
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 7:54 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 10 times

Re: Michigan 2010

Post by jander14indoor »

That was an illustrative example. Simple math for my simple mind.

From the MI state website, there are 240 Div C teams registered this year, not sure how many there were on the date we set the invites. So your numbers become approx: 48*25/240=5. All I can guess is you actually had 29 teams (region 6?? and some didn't show??) registered for 48*29/240=5.8 rounding to 6.

Or wait, I need to take out the alternates since they can't go to state tournament and we don't charge them a state fee. That would reduce the C divisor to 212, put you in region 12 for 48*25/212=5.7 again rounding to 6 invites. That's probably the right set of numbers give or take a few. If you had 50 div B teams, with 48*50/237=10 invites in your region, definitely region 12.

All numbers from the MSO website for membership, but that's current data, not memberships as of the day we set the invites. Not far off though. And trust me the actual math is scrutinized VERY closely. All 20 plus executive board members and the 15 regions check it before its finalized.

I've got the file somewhere, too lazy to dig it up (its on my other 'puter three whole feet away), just wanted to show how the numbers were derived.

Jeff Anderson
Livonia, MI

Return to “2010 Invitationals, Regionals, and States”