Page 14 of 76
Re: Texas 2010
Posted: December 13th, 2009, 11:26 am
by srsvball95
big D wrote:good show LASA good show. However, it would be nice to see some other team win every once in a while. I mean it must get a little tiring always winning. you have to lug around those heavy trophies around and deal with those cursedly heavy medals dangling from your neck. Really, some other team in Texas needs to put its game face on and step up to LASA. Although, at this point, I would be willing to settle for a single team that just held its own. A team that made LASA sweat a little bit. A team that would make them question whether or not they will win a given competition. That is the team i am looking for. This post is my plea. please! oh please! other teams from the great state of Texas step your game up and give LASA something to worry about.
That is all and i thank you for your time
Sincerely,
A man with too much free time and a love of competition
Next year, everyone from Beckendorff A is moving up to C. The only problem is, at our high school (Seven Lakes) we don't have as good a coach as we do now so everything we do will be all on our own with parent support.
Division B Results:
1. Beckendorff Junior High A
2. Beckendorff Junior High B
3. St. John Berchmans Catholic A
4. Riverwood Middle School A
5. St Thomas Aquinas Catholic School
6. Kealing Middle School A
7. Kelly Lane Middle School A
8. Hutto Middle School B
9. Kelly Lane Middle School B
10. All Saints Catholic School A
Re: Texas 2010
Posted: December 13th, 2009, 4:08 pm
by cypressfalls Robert
pirate_capn38 wrote:Congrats to everyone who competed at Greenhill yesterday! As always, tons of fun. I'm kinda new to the forums, although I've heard a lot about them from other people. Looking forward to seeing everyone again at Regionals.
(Despite our awful puns,) LASA in the house!
which C div teams? were there, clements...?
Re: Texas 2010
Posted: December 13th, 2009, 8:15 pm
by pirate_capn38
http://web2.greenhill.org/facultyfolder ... rs_015.pdf
cypressfalls_Robert wrote:pirate_capn38 wrote:Congrats to everyone who competed at Greenhill yesterday! As always, tons of fun. I'm kinda new to the forums, although I've heard a lot about them from other people. Looking forward to seeing everyone again at Regionals.
(Despite our awful puns,) LASA in the house!
which C div teams? were there, clements...?
Re: Texas 2010
Posted: December 13th, 2009, 9:22 pm
by cypressfalls Robert
wow i never knew that teams from other states came to our invitaionals...weird
Re: Texas 2010
Posted: December 13th, 2009, 10:19 pm
by walkingstyx
Not really, Greenhill had teams from other states last and LASA is going to travel to an Ohio invitational later this year.
Also, does anyone what the numbers on the results sheets from Greenhill mean? Where you would normally have cumulative scores of events (like a team that got second in everything would have a score of 43) they had this column with numbers in the thousands, and another one with slightly smaller numbers that were still huge.
Re: Texas 2010
Posted: December 15th, 2009, 4:45 pm
by rocketman1555
walkingstyx wrote:Not really, Greenhill had teams from other states last and LASA is going to travel to an Ohio invitational later this year.
Also, does anyone what the numbers on the results sheets from Greenhill mean? Where you would normally have cumulative scores of events (like a team that got second in everything would have a score of 43) they had this column with numbers in the thousands, and another one with slightly smaller numbers that were still huge.
I think they score it with the lowest place getting the highest amount of points, so the highest score wins.
Re: Texas 2010
Posted: December 15th, 2009, 6:50 pm
by brobo
rocketman1555 wrote:walkingstyx wrote:Not really, Greenhill had teams from other states last and LASA is going to travel to an Ohio invitational later this year.
Also, does anyone what the numbers on the results sheets from Greenhill mean? Where you would normally have cumulative scores of events (like a team that got second in everything would have a score of 43) they had this column with numbers in the thousands, and another one with slightly smaller numbers that were still huge.
I think they score it with the lowest place getting the highest amount of points, so the highest score wins.
I thought it was the other way around. I thought that they added up all your places that you got, so then the lowest score wins, like if you got the places of 1, 3, 4, 8, 21, and another 1, your score would be 30. So the lowest score a team that did 20 events would be 20, where they get 1st in every event.
I could be wrong, I just thought that was how they did it.
Re: Texas 2010
Posted: December 16th, 2009, 6:33 am
by cypressfalls Robert
im pretty sure thats how it goes robodude
Re: Texas 2010
Posted: December 21st, 2009, 4:04 pm
by pirate_capn38
That's usually how it goes, although Greenhill gave back results slightly differently this year, on some sort of point system in addition to rank. I'm not entirely sure which system they used, although after recalculating with the rank system, the results were accurate.
robodude wrote:
I thought it was the other way around. I thought that they added up all your places that you got, so then the lowest score wins, like if you got the places of 1, 3, 4, 8, 21, and another 1, your score would be 30. So the lowest score a team that did 20 events would be 20, where they get 1st in every event.
I could be wrong, I just thought that was how they did it.
Re: Texas 2010
Posted: December 29th, 2009, 2:07 pm
by cypressfalls Robert
how is everyone's preparation for the hutto invitational going (procrastinating until the night before maybe
)?...I just finished all of my building!!!
