Fossils B/C
- jazzy009
- Member
- Posts: 474
- Joined: January 3rd, 2009, 1:12 pm
- Division: Grad
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Fossils B/C
Haha, shall we go down the list?oh joy wrote:what about diatoms? what are they(class, family...?) ?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diatom
That site is good for basic knowledge.
Call me coach.
- amerikestrel
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 606
- Joined: August 17th, 2009, 7:10 am
- Division: C
- State: PA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Fossils B/C
Does anyone have a good picture of a jawless fish (agnatha) fossil? I can't seem to find any... data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/05e69/05e69db6042c47c4237bee32025e2fd49f7b8b47" alt="Mad :x"
Edit: Never mind, I found one that works.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/05e69/05e69db6042c47c4237bee32025e2fd49f7b8b47" alt="Mad :x"
Edit: Never mind, I found one that works.
Not competing in the 2011-12 season.
2011 B division PA State Ornithology and Fossils champ!
Medal count: 14
2011 B division PA State Ornithology and Fossils champ!
Medal count: 14
- E Edgar
- Member
- Posts: 89
- Joined: March 17th, 2008, 3:21 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: IN
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Fossils B/C
Wikipedia tends to be pretty reliable.
You should really use a variety of sources to find information but if you only have time to check one, wikipedia is definitely OK.
You should really use a variety of sources to find information but if you only have time to check one, wikipedia is definitely OK.
My 2010 National Results
Astronomy: 2nd
Physics Lab: 2nd
Technical Problem Solving: 6th
Fossils: 8th
Astronomy: 2nd
Physics Lab: 2nd
Technical Problem Solving: 6th
Fossils: 8th
-
- Member
- Posts: 1388
- Joined: February 5th, 2006, 7:06 am
- Division: Grad
- State: NY
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 3 times
Re: Fossils B/C
It says a bit more than that:oh joy wrote:![]()
yeah...i saw that but i didn't think it was reliable enough...![]()
and it says that diatoms are a group. Im not sure what they mean by that...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diatom#ClassificationClassification
The classification of heterokonts is still unsettled, and they may be treated as a division (or phylum), kingdom, or something in-between. Accordingly, groups like the diatoms may be ranked anywhere from class (usually called Diatomophyceae) to division (usually called Bacillariophyta), with corresponding changes in the ranks of their subgroups.
Diatoms are traditionally divided into two orders:
* centric diatoms (Centrales), which are radially symmetric
* pennate diatoms (Pennales), which are bilaterally symmetric. The former are paraphyletic to the latter.
A more recent classification[2] divides the diatoms into three classes:
* centric diatoms (Coscinodiscophyceae)
* pennate diatoms
o without a raphe (Fragilariophyceae)
o with a raphe (Bacillariophyceae)
It is probable there will be further revisions as understanding of their relationships increases.[7]
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest