Page 14 of 15

Re: Ohio 2019

Posted: April 27th, 2019, 4:58 pm
by MadCow2357
Ohio Division B:
10. Northmont MS
9. Kenston MS
8. New Albany MS
7. Hadley E. Watts
6. Chardon MS
5. Mason MS
4. Westlake Lee Burnson MS
3. Magsig MS
2. Tower Heights MS (139)
1. Solon MS (58)

Ohio Division C:
10. New Albany HS
9. Beachwood HS
8. Westlake HS
7. Northview HS
6. St. Ignatius HS
5. Hudson HS
4. Mentor HS
3. Centerville HS
2. Mason HS (85)
1. Solon HS HS (77)

EDIT: Lol I was late rip

Re: Ohio 2019

Posted: April 27th, 2019, 5:04 pm
by Giantpants
Honestly amazing point totals by the top teams, especially Solon MS (58 gg)
Congrats to Solon MS, Tower Heights, Solon HS, and Mason, as well as all the other teams!

Re: Ohio 2019

Posted: April 27th, 2019, 6:08 pm
by Unome
sciolyperson1 wrote:Div B:
1) Solon 58
2) Tower Heights 139
3) Magsig 186
4) Westlake 233
5) Mason 239
6) Chardon 259
7) Watts 262
8) New Alb 263

Div C:
1) Solon 77
2) Mason 85
3) Centerville 108
4) Mentor 128
5) Hudson 241
6) St. Ignatius 264
7) Northview 274
8) Westlake 278
Wow, for once everything basically went as expected.

Re: Ohio 2019

Posted: April 27th, 2019, 6:12 pm
by jgrischow1
So the word on the street is that the division B anatomy test had very little if anything to do with the content in the rules manual. And if you look at the scores, Anatomy was the worst or second worst event for several of the top teams including Solon, Kenston, Chardon, Tower Heights, Magsig etc. Anybody hear similarly?

Re: Ohio 2019

Posted: April 27th, 2019, 7:09 pm
by krasabnk
jgrischow1 wrote:So the word on the street is that the division B anatomy test had very little if anything to do with the content in the rules manual. And if you look at the scores, Anatomy was the worst or second worst event for several of the top teams including Solon, Kenston, Chardon, Tower Heights, Magsig etc. Anybody hear similarly?
Not from OH, but can attest to this. Sister thought she did very well in A&P but there were several questions that were definitely not on the rules sheet or even mentioned. Quite odd.

Re: Ohio 2019

Posted: April 28th, 2019, 9:38 am
by shep888
Does anybody have a link to pdf results for each event or an overall spreadsheet for event results for B Division? :)

Re: Ohio 2019

Posted: April 28th, 2019, 10:31 am
by Deathstalker
shep888 wrote:Does anybody have a link to pdf results for each event or an overall spreadsheet for event results for B Division? :)
These are the results for Division B and Division C. https://ohso.osu.edu/sites/default/file ... esults.pdf

Re: Ohio 2019

Posted: April 28th, 2019, 10:40 am
by shep888
Are there individual ones for each B division event? Particularly build events with scores/times?

Re: Ohio 2019

Posted: April 28th, 2019, 10:44 am
by jgrischow1
shep888 wrote:Are there individual ones for each B division event? Particularly build events with scores/times?
I don't think Ohio has ever released raw scores for the State tournament.

Re: Ohio 2019

Posted: April 29th, 2019, 5:29 am
by chalker
krasabnk wrote:
jgrischow1 wrote:So the word on the street is that the division B anatomy test had very little if anything to do with the content in the rules manual. And if you look at the scores, Anatomy was the worst or second worst event for several of the top teams including Solon, Kenston, Chardon, Tower Heights, Magsig etc. Anybody hear similarly?
Not from OH, but can attest to this. Sister thought she did very well in A&P but there were several questions that were definitely not on the rules sheet or even mentioned. Quite odd.
There were several arbitration requests for A&P Div B. The 3 arbitrators looked very closely at all the questions and even consulted some external advice on them. All questions were within the scope of the topics of the rules. That said, it was a very hard test. I think the 1st place team got something like 19 out of the 56 questions correct.