Have you considered using a solid cf rod, instead of a hollow aluminum tube for your non-braking axle?JasperKota wrote: As for axles: I'm currently using a hollow aluminum tube, but I read somewhere that it bends too much (haven't actually tested it yet), so maybe something like brass would work better although heavier. For the braking system, I'm using a steel 1/4 threaded rod and wingnut.
Mousetrap Vehicle C
-
- Member
- Posts: 38
- Joined: March 3rd, 2016, 12:16 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Mousetrap Vehicle C
- JasperKota
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 188
- Joined: October 22nd, 2015, 8:01 pm
- Division: C
- State: NY
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 12 times
Re: Mousetrap Vehicle C
I've never thought about using a cf axle, but I'll look into it! Probably after my upcoming invite early December though, not that much time to order carbon fiber now. Thanks for the suggestionGoldDigger wrote: Have you considered using a solid cf rod, instead of a hollow aluminum tube for your non-braking axle?
2020 Events: Fossils, Gravity Vehicle, Wright Stuff, Ping Pong Parachute
2019 Events: Fossils, Mousetrap Vehicle, Wright Stuff
2018 Events: Helicopters, Mousetrap Vehicle, Parasitology, WIDI
2017 Events: Ecology, Invasives, Wright Stuff
2016 Events: Crave the Wave, Dynamic Planet, Invasives
2019 Events: Fossils, Mousetrap Vehicle, Wright Stuff
2018 Events: Helicopters, Mousetrap Vehicle, Parasitology, WIDI
2017 Events: Ecology, Invasives, Wright Stuff
2016 Events: Crave the Wave, Dynamic Planet, Invasives
-
- Member
- Posts: 438
- Joined: October 9th, 2017, 6:25 pm
- Division: C
- State: NJ
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Mousetrap Vehicle C
My partner and I were considering this at one point for battery buggy. It should work in theory, and I have seen many incredibly strong and experienced competitors (cough cough winduJasperKota wrote:I've never thought about using a cf axle, but I'll look into it! Probably after my upcoming invite early December though, not that much time to order carbon fiber now. Thanks for the suggestionGoldDigger wrote: Have you considered using a solid cf rod, instead of a hollow aluminum tube for your non-braking axle?

- windu34
- Staff Emeritus
- Posts: 1382
- Joined: April 19th, 2015, 6:37 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: FL
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 37 times
Re: Mousetrap Vehicle C
Yes CF rods for axles are the way to goshrewdPanther46 wrote:My partner and I were considering this at one point for battery buggy. It should work in theory, and I have seen many incredibly strong and experienced competitors (cough cough winduJasperKota wrote:I've never thought about using a cf axle, but I'll look into it! Probably after my upcoming invite early December though, not that much time to order carbon fiber now. Thanks for the suggestionGoldDigger wrote: Have you considered using a solid cf rod, instead of a hollow aluminum tube for your non-braking axle?) use them. We decided not to use them for first few invitationals because our car is already light enough. However for mousetrap, idk the possible advantages
Boca Raton Community High School Alumni
University of Florida Science Olympiad Co-Founder
Florida Science Olympiad Board of Directors
kevin@floridascienceolympiad.org || windu34's Userpage
University of Florida Science Olympiad Co-Founder
Florida Science Olympiad Board of Directors
kevin@floridascienceolympiad.org || windu34's Userpage
- PM2017
- Member
- Posts: 524
- Joined: January 20th, 2017, 5:02 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: CA
- Has thanked: 23 times
- Been thanked: 13 times
Re: Mousetrap Vehicle C
I got all my pieces, but I was doing some calculations in hindsight, and I think I might have made some mistakes.
I'm using 3mm threaded rods as axles, but my wheels have a diameter of 4in (101.6 mm), meaning the ideal mechanical advantage of my wheel and axle is 0.0295. (with axle as the effort force, and wheel as the resistance force.) I haven't even factored in the drive arm in this calculation Have I ordered pieces that don't give the system enough torque?
Also, with this system, my wingnut breaking system will only be wound 6.26 mm...
I was thinking of adding some sort of circular bolt around the drive axle to virtually increase the width of the axle, increasing the IMA, but I can't find any solutions to the issue with the wingnut breaking system.
Advice?
I'm using 3mm threaded rods as axles, but my wheels have a diameter of 4in (101.6 mm), meaning the ideal mechanical advantage of my wheel and axle is 0.0295. (with axle as the effort force, and wheel as the resistance force.) I haven't even factored in the drive arm in this calculation Have I ordered pieces that don't give the system enough torque?
Also, with this system, my wingnut breaking system will only be wound 6.26 mm...
I was thinking of adding some sort of circular bolt around the drive axle to virtually increase the width of the axle, increasing the IMA, but I can't find any solutions to the issue with the wingnut breaking system.
Advice?
West High '19
UC Berkeley '23
Go Bears!
UC Berkeley '23
Go Bears!
- Alex-RCHS
- Member
- Posts: 539
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 3:46 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: NC
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Mousetrap Vehicle C
I would just buy thicker axles. The tiny increase in weight is well worth the extra accuracy and safety.PM2017 wrote:I got all my pieces, but I was doing some calculations in hindsight, and I think I might have made some mistakes.
I'm using 3mm threaded rods as axles, but my wheels have a diameter of 4in (101.6 mm), meaning the ideal mechanical advantage of my wheel and axle is 0.0295. (with axle as the effort force, and wheel as the resistance force.) I haven't even factored in the drive arm in this calculation Have I ordered pieces that don't give the system enough torque?
Also, with this system, my wingnut breaking system will only be wound 6.26 mm...
I was thinking of adding some sort of circular bolt around the drive axle to virtually increase the width of the axle, increasing the IMA, but I can't find any solutions to the issue with the wingnut breaking system.
Advice?
- PM2017
- Member
- Posts: 524
- Joined: January 20th, 2017, 5:02 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: CA
- Has thanked: 23 times
- Been thanked: 13 times
Re: Mousetrap Vehicle C
Do you think getting smaller wheels would work as well?Alex-RCHS wrote:I would just buy thicker axles. The tiny increase in weight is well worth the extra accuracy and safety.PM2017 wrote:I got all my pieces, but I was doing some calculations in hindsight, and I think I might have made some mistakes.
I'm using 3mm threaded rods as axles, but my wheels have a diameter of 4in (101.6 mm), meaning the ideal mechanical advantage of my wheel and axle is 0.0295. (with axle as the effort force, and wheel as the resistance force.) I haven't even factored in the drive arm in this calculation Have I ordered pieces that don't give the system enough torque?
Also, with this system, my wingnut breaking system will only be wound 6.26 mm...
I was thinking of adding some sort of circular bolt around the drive axle to virtually increase the width of the axle, increasing the IMA, but I can't find any solutions to the issue with the wingnut breaking system.
Advice?
West High '19
UC Berkeley '23
Go Bears!
UC Berkeley '23
Go Bears!
- Alex-RCHS
- Member
- Posts: 539
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 3:46 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: NC
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Mousetrap Vehicle C
Oh yeah, that would probably be easier and lighter.PM2017 wrote:Do you think getting smaller wheels would work as well?Alex-RCHS wrote:I would just buy thicker axles. The tiny increase in weight is well worth the extra accuracy and safety.PM2017 wrote:I got all my pieces, but I was doing some calculations in hindsight, and I think I might have made some mistakes.
I'm using 3mm threaded rods as axles, but my wheels have a diameter of 4in (101.6 mm), meaning the ideal mechanical advantage of my wheel and axle is 0.0295. (with axle as the effort force, and wheel as the resistance force.) I haven't even factored in the drive arm in this calculation Have I ordered pieces that don't give the system enough torque?
Also, with this system, my wingnut breaking system will only be wound 6.26 mm...
I was thinking of adding some sort of circular bolt around the drive axle to virtually increase the width of the axle, increasing the IMA, but I can't find any solutions to the issue with the wingnut breaking system.
Advice?
- PM2017
- Member
- Posts: 524
- Joined: January 20th, 2017, 5:02 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: CA
- Has thanked: 23 times
- Been thanked: 13 times
Re: Mousetrap Vehicle C
I don't know if this has been discussed here, but in my school's robotics team, we are currently Andymark's 2in, 35 durometer compliant wheels. Do you guys think that these would work for MS vehicle?
https://www.andymark.com/product-p/am-3462_green.htm
https://www.andymark.com/product-p/am-3462_green.htm
West High '19
UC Berkeley '23
Go Bears!
UC Berkeley '23
Go Bears!
- dragonfruit35
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 296
- Joined: February 28th, 2015, 7:49 am
- Division: Grad
- State: VA
- Pronouns: She/Her/Hers
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Mousetrap Vehicle C
Do you have a way to attach them to your axles? If so, then probably, but from what I can tell from the picture they look like they might be a little heavy.PM2017 wrote:I don't know if this has been discussed here, but in my school's robotics team, we are currently Andymark's 2in, 35 durometer compliant wheels. Do you guys think that these would work for MS vehicle?
https://www.andymark.com/product-p/am-3462_green.htm
tjhsst '20
virginia tech '24
2x codebusters national medalist
"it's not a pen, it's a principle!" - annie edison
virginia tech '24
2x codebusters national medalist
"it's not a pen, it's a principle!" - annie edison
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests