Preliminary:Forestry

Locked
User avatar
kjhsscioly
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 517
Joined: January 16th, 2009, 11:55 am
Division: Grad
State: IL
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Preliminary:Forestry

Post by kjhsscioly »

Paradox21 wrote:Well, if you just took a picture of a leaf, there would be no question as to whether you could bring it in to competition. And it would not decompose or get damaged.
Decomposition wouldn't be an issue, you just have to iron the leaf between two sheets of wax paper. I think the bigger concern would be them falling out of you binder in competition, or something like that.

I just checked out Sibleys, and I haven't gotten to read it, but it looks nice for initial learning. Later, though I might use a bigger encyclopedia type book, if it is allowed.
User avatar
quizbowl
Member
Member
Posts: 1044
Joined: April 10th, 2010, 3:48 pm
Division: Grad
State: NY
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Preliminary:Forestry

Post by quizbowl »

Well, in fossils this year, the rules states
Rules wrote:...and one three ring binder (any size) containing information in any form from an source. The materials must be 3-hole punched and inserted into the rings (sheet protectors are allowed)
So basically, I could have taped in small Diatoms and other small fossils into the binder, and it would be legal? I don't think that it would be either ethically correct or correct in the rules, so I doubt any leaves will be allowed.
2010: 5th in NYS
2011: 4th in NYS
2012: 3rd in NYS
<quizbowl> ey kid ya want some shortbread
<EASTstroudsburg13> I don't know why, but I just can't bring myself to delete this post.
anatomy
Member
Member
Posts: 85
Joined: May 16th, 2011, 5:08 pm
Division: B
State: PA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Preliminary:Forestry

Post by anatomy »

its true
it shouldn't be allowed
never underestimate the power of anatomy
hehehe

2012 regionals: anatomy: 1st forestry: 1st microbe mission 4th
2012 states: anatomy: 3rd forestry: 4th crimebusters: 3rd microbe mission 8th
User avatar
gneissisnice
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 930
Joined: March 11th, 2008, 9:10 am
Division: Grad
State: NY
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 13 times

Re: Preliminary:Forestry

Post by gneissisnice »

quizbowl wrote:Well, in fossils this year, the rules states
Rules wrote:...and one three ring binder (any size) containing information in any form from an source. The materials must be 3-hole punched and inserted into the rings (sheet protectors are allowed)
So basically, I could have taped in small Diatoms and other small fossils into the binder, and it would be legal? I don't think that it would be either ethically correct or correct in the rules, so I doubt any leaves will be allowed.
Well, you can't three hole punch a fossil, but you could technically put a leaf in a sheet protector and put that in. That doesn't look like it's against the rules, honestly, and I can't imagine why that would be unethical at all.
2009 events:
Fossils: 1st @ reg. 3rd @ states (stupid dinosaurs...) 5th @ nats.
Dynamic: 1st @ reg. 19thish @ states, 18th @ nats
Herpetology (NOT the study of herpes): NA
Enviro Chem: 39th @ states =(
Cell Bio: 9th @ reg. 18th @ nats
Remote: 6th @ states 3rd @ Nats
Ecology: 5th @ Nats
User avatar
purplepeopleeater
Member
Member
Posts: 221
Joined: June 4th, 2010, 10:51 am
Division: C
State: TX
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0
Contact:

Re: Preliminary:Forestry

Post by purplepeopleeater »

the ONLY reason that i could see it NOT happening is health issues but that is HIGHLY HIGHLY HIGHLY unlikely... Some people, other than being allegic to pollen are allergic to the trees themselves or any part of the tree.... >.< but its not as common as pollen of course.. So other then them saying no to say no.. there isn't any reason it SHOULDN'T be allowed.
oh well
have to wait and see
No matter what the experiment's result, there will always be someone eager to:(a) misinterpret it(b) fake it, or (c) believe it supports his own pet theory.
2010 Nationals---
  • 3rd Model This, 17th Bio Process Lab, 27th Science Crime Busters
User avatar
Kokonilly
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 631
Joined: January 11th, 2009, 7:59 am
Division: Grad
State: CA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Preliminary:Forestry

Post by Kokonilly »

purplepeopleeater wrote:the ONLY reason that i could see it NOT happening is health issues but that is HIGHLY HIGHLY HIGHLY unlikely... Some people, other than being allegic to pollen are allergic to the trees themselves or any part of the tree.... >.< but its not as common as pollen of course.. So other then them saying no to say no.. there isn't any reason it SHOULDN'T be allowed.
oh well
have to wait and see
I have hayfever and am allergic to grass and trees and everything organic, it seems >.<, but I don't see how it would be possible for anyone to be severely allergic to any of that stuff - as in, near-death respiratory issues or some such thing. My allergies are bad but not THAT bad, and I seriously doubt anyone would have serious enough issues with that for it to be a problem.
User avatar
amerikestrel
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 606
Joined: August 17th, 2009, 7:10 am
Division: C
State: PA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Preliminary:Forestry

Post by amerikestrel »

If you're deathly allergic to trees you should not be doing Forestry.
Not competing in the 2011-12 season.
2011 B division PA State Ornithology and Fossils champ!
Medal count: 14
User avatar
nerpas
Member
Member
Posts: 19
Joined: April 9th, 2011, 11:56 am
Division: C
State: MN
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Preliminary:Forestry

Post by nerpas »

The usual thing describing allowed notes is "in any form from any source", so if they keep saying that then leaves would be allowed. But honestly, I can't see physical leaves as being that helpful. A picture of a leaf could have just as much detail, and it wouldn't get brown and crunchy and then start to distintegrate....
Also, wouldn't anyone who's super extremely allergic to trees have difficulties walking to the exam building? (...unless they live in the tundra)

Edit: oops, I just realized this is kinda redundant
User avatar
Kokonilly
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 631
Joined: January 11th, 2009, 7:59 am
Division: Grad
State: CA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Preliminary:Forestry

Post by Kokonilly »

amerikestrel wrote:If you're deathly allergic to trees you should not be doing Forestry.
nerpas wrote:Also, wouldn't anyone who's super extremely allergic to trees have difficulties walking to the exam building? (...unless they live in the tundra)
Both extremely true. If you're deathly allergic to trees, you should also be living in a bubble. >.<
User avatar
kjhsscioly
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 517
Joined: January 16th, 2009, 11:55 am
Division: Grad
State: IL
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Preliminary:Forestry

Post by kjhsscioly »

How can you be deathly allergic to ALL trees... I understand one tree, or plants in general, but there is no taxonomic group to define "tree"
Locked

Return to “2011 Study Events”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests