Scioly Assassination Number 8:Redemption
-
Assasinator
- Posting Games Account
- Posts: 0
- Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2008 8:41 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Scioly Assassination Number 8:Redemption
Yes gneissisnice you did say that but look you said your logic is bad so you essentially said that your because was invalid yourself. Without a because statement your accusation can't be accepted. If you had simply just changed your because to something else it would have been accepted. I do commende you though you were able to get kube to panic and hijack the account.
gneissisnice wrote:oh wait, my logic is bad, rocketman1555 was the only one to use the Assassinator one. Though he HAS been eerily quiet during this whole scenario....my apologies starpug, but i'll keep my accusation up anyway, for the heck of it.
This Account has been deactivated. Ignore any posts made from it. If you want to talk to the current Assassinator, send a PM to the Assassinator Account. If you have a complaint about the current Assassinator, PM a former Assassinator such as Skystrider or Rocketman.
-
gneissisnice
- Exalted Member

- Posts: 930
- Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 9:10 am
- Division: Grad
- State: NY
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 13 times
Re: Scioly Assassination Number 8:Redemption
Sure I had a because statement. It was 'for the heck of it". Thats a good because, right?
2009 events:
Fossils: 1st @ reg. 3rd @ states (stupid dinosaurs...) 5th @ nats.
Dynamic: 1st @ reg. 19thish @ states, 18th @ nats
Herpetology (NOT the study of herpes): NA
Enviro Chem: 39th @ states =(
Cell Bio: 9th @ reg. 18th @ nats
Remote: 6th @ states 3rd @ Nats
Ecology: 5th @ Nats
Fossils: 1st @ reg. 3rd @ states (stupid dinosaurs...) 5th @ nats.
Dynamic: 1st @ reg. 19thish @ states, 18th @ nats
Herpetology (NOT the study of herpes): NA
Enviro Chem: 39th @ states =(
Cell Bio: 9th @ reg. 18th @ nats
Remote: 6th @ states 3rd @ Nats
Ecology: 5th @ Nats
-
sachleen
- Exalted Member

- Posts: 225
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 8:31 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: CA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 3 times
Re: Scioly Assassination Number 8:Redemption
ok, dude, you can stop playing it now, they KNOW the secret...Assasinator wrote:Yes gneissisnice you did say that but look you said your logic is bad so you essentially said that your because was invalid yourself. Without a because statement your accusation can't be accepted. If you had simply just changed your because to something else it would have been accepted. I do commende you though you were able to get kube to panic and hijack the account.gneissisnice wrote:oh wait, my logic is bad, rocketman1555 was the only one to use the Assassinator one. Though he HAS been eerily quiet during this whole scenario....my apologies starpug, but i'll keep my accusation up anyway, for the heck of it.
-
rocketman1555
- Staff Emeritus

- Posts: 577
- Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2006 8:21 am
- Division: Grad
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Scioly Assassination Number 8:Redemption
so are we starting another assasination game, or is it over for a while?
I am a practitioner of the art of magic known as science.
-
Assasinator
- Posting Games Account
- Posts: 0
- Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2008 8:41 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Scioly Assassination Number 8:Redemption
Your being sarcastic I hope because you should know that's not a correct because statement. It's common sense the accusation has to have a good reason behind it not "just cause" or "for the heck of it".gneissisnice wrote:Sure I had a because statement. It was 'for the heck of it". Thats a good because, right?
This Account has been deactivated. Ignore any posts made from it. If you want to talk to the current Assassinator, send a PM to the Assassinator Account. If you have a complaint about the current Assassinator, PM a former Assassinator such as Skystrider or Rocketman.
-
gneissisnice
- Exalted Member

- Posts: 930
- Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 9:10 am
- Division: Grad
- State: NY
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 13 times
Re: Scioly Assassination Number 8:Redemption
Sigh. Nevermind. Anyway, since I got it right, do I get to choose the next assassinator?
2009 events:
Fossils: 1st @ reg. 3rd @ states (stupid dinosaurs...) 5th @ nats.
Dynamic: 1st @ reg. 19thish @ states, 18th @ nats
Herpetology (NOT the study of herpes): NA
Enviro Chem: 39th @ states =(
Cell Bio: 9th @ reg. 18th @ nats
Remote: 6th @ states 3rd @ Nats
Ecology: 5th @ Nats
Fossils: 1st @ reg. 3rd @ states (stupid dinosaurs...) 5th @ nats.
Dynamic: 1st @ reg. 19thish @ states, 18th @ nats
Herpetology (NOT the study of herpes): NA
Enviro Chem: 39th @ states =(
Cell Bio: 9th @ reg. 18th @ nats
Remote: 6th @ states 3rd @ Nats
Ecology: 5th @ Nats
-
starpug
- Admin Emeritus

- Posts: 932
- Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2008 6:51 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: ME
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Scioly Assassination Number 8:Redemption
You didn't get it right 
Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please. - Mark Twain
-
sachleen
- Exalted Member

- Posts: 225
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 8:31 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: CA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 3 times
Re: Scioly Assassination Number 8:Redemption
technically, im still an officer.... and i did rat out starpug with a valid because statement, explaining exactly what happened... so... yeah 
just in case "I ACCUSE STARPUG OF BEING THE ASSASSINATOR BECAUSE I WAS THE PREVIOUS ASSASSINATOR AND I ALWAYS KNEW IT WAS HIM" there
... i think this game is way beyond over now... lol.. just in case it isn't, i vote that gneissisnice gets to pick the next assassinator.
just in case "I ACCUSE STARPUG OF BEING THE ASSASSINATOR BECAUSE I WAS THE PREVIOUS ASSASSINATOR AND I ALWAYS KNEW IT WAS HIM" there
