Wow, it's like a war zone in here (er, no pun intended).
zyzzyva98 wrote:Hey guys... troops... South Korea? Screw the health care bill and vacation for just a minute, I want to know what everyone thinks of the situation involving the crazy little man in North Korea and our 28,500 ground troops out there. Does anyone feel they are necessary to deter North Korea?
I honestly don't know (apologies for not reading the news that much lately). If you ask me, 28,500 American soldiers stationed in S Korea seems a little excessive...I don't think that it's really that necessary, seeing as the US can order thousands of troops to S Korea in a matter of hours. Yes, we shouldn't let/encourage N Korea to nuke their neighbors, but military intimidation certainly isn't going to decrease tensions. Two scenarios, four outcomes:
US declares that they will not let N Korea take military action against S Korea, but doesn't send troops to S Korea:
1. N Korea attacks S Korea anyways, because the US won't want to start WWIII by sending soldiers in
2. N Korea does nothing, because they know the US can send tens of thousands of soldiers in a very short amount of time
US sends troops to S Korea to protect them from N Korea:
3. N Korea feels obligated to prove that they're not intimidated by the US military, and attacks S Korea anyways
4. N Korea does nothing, because they don't want to start WWIII since the US is now involved