Re: Wright Stuff C
Posted: November 30th, 2018, 10:57 am
Polar:
We have a column "Rubber Width" in our log sheet, but it is expressed as g/in. The important thing here is that a given "width" as measured in mm or inches may have a different g/in due to density or thickness variations. The stored energy will be proportional to the g/in, not the width.
In this year's case, since the mass is not controlled by rule, perhaps it is less important (in terms of getting usable rubber made), but it is still an important parameter, more so than a dimensional width.
In addition, read the notes on this simple rubber stripper. It cannot strip off a tiny amount, so be sure to get stock rubber widths that you will strip off 25% or more. It should give reliable results when you do that. You may find you need some very thin shims for adjustment.
When stripping rubber, you want to first cut blanks a bit longer than you need, all the same length. Then weigh each blank, and order them by weight (and this will tell you how much your density is varying). Now, with short samples, set up your stripper to give the percentage you want with your heaviest strip. For example, if your goal mass (g/in * length of blank) is 72% of the current blank strip, then weigh some 3" pieces, strip them, weigh again, and determine the percentage. Adjust stripper until the percentage matches your goal percentage. Keep careful data on each 3" sample strip, so you know how much the percentage changes for each shim setting. Strip a LOT of 3" samples!
Now strip your heaviest blank, and weigh it. How close did you get? If needed, make adjustments. If your next blank is same mass as first one, strip it, weigh it, log it.
Now as you get to lighter blanks, you will want to shim out the blade, based on your logs. So on a lighter strip, with the same goal g/in, you will need to cut slightly wider (slightly higher percentage) to get the same final mass.
It is a lot of work up front, but once you get some reliable data amassed, you will find it straightforward to hit your target g/in without wasting too much rubber. After stripping a bunch of samples, you will see what the incremental shim is to change a certain percentage.
Only in America do we have units such as "g/in". You can do g/cm, but then trading data becomes difficult!
Coach Chuck
We have a column "Rubber Width" in our log sheet, but it is expressed as g/in. The important thing here is that a given "width" as measured in mm or inches may have a different g/in due to density or thickness variations. The stored energy will be proportional to the g/in, not the width.
In this year's case, since the mass is not controlled by rule, perhaps it is less important (in terms of getting usable rubber made), but it is still an important parameter, more so than a dimensional width.
In addition, read the notes on this simple rubber stripper. It cannot strip off a tiny amount, so be sure to get stock rubber widths that you will strip off 25% or more. It should give reliable results when you do that. You may find you need some very thin shims for adjustment.
When stripping rubber, you want to first cut blanks a bit longer than you need, all the same length. Then weigh each blank, and order them by weight (and this will tell you how much your density is varying). Now, with short samples, set up your stripper to give the percentage you want with your heaviest strip. For example, if your goal mass (g/in * length of blank) is 72% of the current blank strip, then weigh some 3" pieces, strip them, weigh again, and determine the percentage. Adjust stripper until the percentage matches your goal percentage. Keep careful data on each 3" sample strip, so you know how much the percentage changes for each shim setting. Strip a LOT of 3" samples!
Now strip your heaviest blank, and weigh it. How close did you get? If needed, make adjustments. If your next blank is same mass as first one, strip it, weigh it, log it.
Now as you get to lighter blanks, you will want to shim out the blade, based on your logs. So on a lighter strip, with the same goal g/in, you will need to cut slightly wider (slightly higher percentage) to get the same final mass.
It is a lot of work up front, but once you get some reliable data amassed, you will find it straightforward to hit your target g/in without wasting too much rubber. After stripping a bunch of samples, you will see what the incremental shim is to change a certain percentage.
Only in America do we have units such as "g/in". You can do g/cm, but then trading data becomes difficult!
Coach Chuck