Air Trajectory B/C

Locked
User avatar
bernard
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 2498
Joined: January 5th, 2014, 3:12 pm
Division: Grad
State: WA
Pronouns: He/Him/His
Has thanked: 184 times
Been thanked: 784 times
Contact:

Re: Air Trajectory B/C

Post by bernard »

chalker wrote:
Whiteheat073 wrote: Do you believe a trebuchet would be able to shoot perfectly straight? I am worried about it launching with too much velocity and that it will go too high and go over the target.
Keep in mind that the launching force has to come from air pressure or movement. It's going to be hard to do that in a traditional trebuchet design.
There's a design I think fewer teams come to making probably because it indirectly uses air pressure to launch the projectile. Here's a picture that I think some might be interested in.
windu34 wrote:This would also be a lot more time-efficient for those who attend nationals. Just plug in data points to formulize and get a function
I'd say it'd be more time-efficient for any teams that put in the time to making it work with how they operate their device, not just teams that attend nationals.
"One of the ways that I believe people express their appreciation to the rest of humanity is to make something wonderful and put it out there." – Steve Jobs
User avatar
windu34
Staff Emeritus
Staff Emeritus
Posts: 1382
Joined: April 19th, 2015, 6:37 pm
Division: Grad
State: FL
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 37 times

Re: Air Trajectory B/C

Post by windu34 »

bernard wrote: There's a design I think fewer teams come to making probably because it indirectly uses air pressure to launch the projectile. Here's a picture that I think some might be interested in.
You know a device is legit when its covered in tape :D
I suppose it has a valid model though
Boca Raton Community High School Alumni
University of Florida Science Olympiad Co-Founder
Florida Science Olympiad Board of Directors
kevin@floridascienceolympiad.org || windu34's Userpage
chalker
Member
Member
Posts: 2107
Joined: January 9th, 2009, 7:30 pm
Division: Grad
State: OH
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 56 times

Re: Air Trajectory B/C

Post by chalker »

windu34 wrote:
bernard wrote: There's a design I think fewer teams come to making probably because it indirectly uses air pressure to launch the projectile. Here's a picture that I think some might be interested in.
You know a device is legit when its covered in tape :D
I suppose it has a valid model though
Just to clarify, the device in the picture is NOT a trebuchet design. It does indirectly use air pressure to launch, which is indeed explicitly allowed in the rules. My original comment above was mainly aimed at trying to ensure everyone knows about the requirement to use air movement or pressure. It's going to be REALLY hard to do that with a traditional trebuchet design (but not impossible).

Student Alumni
National Event Supervisor
National Physical Sciences Rules Committee Chair
User avatar
Whiteheat073
Member
Member
Posts: 49
Joined: November 6th, 2015, 8:27 am
Division: B
State: IL
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0
Contact:

Re: Air Trajectory B/C

Post by Whiteheat073 »

Thanks Bernard!
chalker wrote:
windu34 wrote:
bernard wrote: There's a design I think fewer teams come to making probably becaushttp://scioly.org/phpBB3/images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gife it indirectly uses air pressure to launch the projectile. Here's a picture that I think some might be interested in.
You know a device is legit when its covered in tape :D
I suppose it has a valid model though
Just to clarify, the device in the picture is NOT a trebuchet design. It does indirectly use air pressure to launch, which is indeed explicitly allowed in the rules. My original comment above was mainly aimed at trying to ensure everyone knows about the requirement to use air movement or pressure. It's going to be REALLY hard to do that with a traditional trebuchet design (but not impossible).
In that case, I might not use a trebuchet.
windu34 wrote:
bernard wrote: There's a design I think fewer teams come to making probably because it indirectly uses air pressure to launch the projectile. Here's a picture that I think some might be interested in.
You know a device is legit when its covered in tape :D
I suppose it has a valid model though
Exactly :D
CM
Yes I'm a geek who likes TF2. Don't judge me.
User avatar
Whiteheat073
Member
Member
Posts: 49
Joined: November 6th, 2015, 8:27 am
Division: B
State: IL
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0
Contact:

Re: Air Trajectory B/C

Post by Whiteheat073 »

So let me get this straight. Laser pointers are allowed, right?
CM
Yes I'm a geek who likes TF2. Don't judge me.
brayden box
Member
Member
Posts: 90
Joined: September 21st, 2015, 7:43 am
Division: B
State: NY
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0
Contact:

Re: Air Trajectory B/C

Post by brayden box »

There isn't anything in the rules against it! :)
BBOX
User avatar
Whiteheat073
Member
Member
Posts: 49
Joined: November 6th, 2015, 8:27 am
Division: B
State: IL
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0
Contact:

Re: Air Trajectory B/C

Post by Whiteheat073 »

brayden box wrote:There isn't anything in the rules against it! :)
Okay. Thanks!
CM
Yes I'm a geek who likes TF2. Don't judge me.
User avatar
bernard
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 2498
Joined: January 5th, 2014, 3:12 pm
Division: Grad
State: WA
Pronouns: He/Him/His
Has thanked: 184 times
Been thanked: 784 times
Contact:

Re: Air Trajectory B/C

Post by bernard »

Whiteheat073 wrote:
brayden box wrote:There isn't anything in the rules against it! :)
Okay. Thanks!
Be sure to note that 3.h. prohibits electrical components as part of the device or triggering device. It was mentioned in last year's thread that lasers could probably be used only if they were removed from the device prior to each launch. There was an FAQ last year about it (http://www.scioly.org/phpBB3/viewtopic. ... 97#p275297) but keep in mind that last year's FAQs do not necessarily apply to this year's rules.
"One of the ways that I believe people express their appreciation to the rest of humanity is to make something wonderful and put it out there." – Steve Jobs
chalker
Member
Member
Posts: 2107
Joined: January 9th, 2009, 7:30 pm
Division: Grad
State: OH
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 56 times

Re: Air Trajectory B/C

Post by chalker »

bernard wrote:
Whiteheat073 wrote:
brayden box wrote:There isn't anything in the rules against it! :)
Okay. Thanks!
Be sure to note that 3.h. prohibits electrical components as part of the device or triggering device. It was mentioned in last year's thread that lasers could probably be used only if they were removed from the device prior to each launch. There was an FAQ last year about it (http://www.scioly.org/phpBB3/viewtopic. ... 97#p275297) but keep in mind that last year's FAQs do not necessarily apply to this year's rules.
Also keep in mind we have an official policy about Lasers that must be followed: https://www.soinc.org/lasers

Student Alumni
National Event Supervisor
National Physical Sciences Rules Committee Chair
User avatar
Whiteheat073
Member
Member
Posts: 49
Joined: November 6th, 2015, 8:27 am
Division: B
State: IL
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0
Contact:

Re: Air Trajectory B/C

Post by Whiteheat073 »

bernard wrote:
Whiteheat073 wrote:
brayden box wrote:There isn't anything in the rules against it! :)
Okay. Thanks!
Be sure to note that 3.h. prohibits electrical components as part of the device or triggering device. It was mentioned in last year's thread that lasers could probably be used only if they were removed from the device prior to each launch. There was an FAQ last year about it (http://www.scioly.org/phpBB3/viewtopic. ... 97#p275297) but keep in mind that last year's FAQs do not necessarily apply to this year's rules.
I wasn't wanting it attached, I was wanting to hold it. Would that be allowed?
CM
Yes I'm a geek who likes TF2. Don't judge me.
Locked

Return to “Air Trajectory B/C”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests