Page 12 of 79
Re: Pennsylvania 2009
Posted: January 19th, 2009, 3:43 pm
by Deeisenberg
Yeah, I would say that in MOST years, SW is the most competitive B division region.
Re: Pennsylvania 2009
Posted: January 19th, 2009, 3:46 pm
by denmarksoccer
inuyashakusho wrote:Yeah, I would say that in MOST years, SW is the most competitive B division region.
But not in recent years?
Re: Pennsylvania 2009
Posted: January 19th, 2009, 4:31 pm
by eyeball138
No, more so in recent years. Sewickley only became a science olympiad power house a few years ago. Most recently, SW has been most competitive.
In fact, Sewickley made nationals for the first time in 2006. Shady Side was the top B school in PA until Sewickley came along. This makes their rivalry even more fierce.
Re: Pennsylvania 2009
Posted: January 19th, 2009, 5:03 pm
by L42
I would say SE is most competitive, because SW doesn't have the sheer magnitude of good teams. There are really only 2 in SW.
Re: Pennsylvania 2009
Posted: January 19th, 2009, 5:26 pm
by binary010101
How do you think PA is going to do at Nationals?
Re: Pennsylvania 2009
Posted: January 19th, 2009, 6:28 pm
by trophymursky
Brinclhof wrote:trophymursky wrote:The thing with se is that their are so many good teams. Penncrest, Stoga, LM, Rustin, Strath Haven, i can really go on and on. Its such a tough region that you never know who will win. Last year durring the awards ceremony everyone thought connestoga was going to win and they were 2 points away from second. Absolutely nothing is predetermined and it will be a very very very close regional.
'Stoga in 3rd was 40 pts behind 2nd place P-Crest. (Check
http://projects.juniata.edu/scioly/paco ... scores.pdf ) But yeah, SE is rough, and has some great teams in both B and C. It's always interesting
at regionals last year for se penncrest won, harriton was 2nd and stoga was 2 points behind harriton.
Re: Pennsylvania 2009
Posted: January 19th, 2009, 6:36 pm
by eyeball138
binary010101 wrote:How do you think PA is going to do at Nationals?
Pretty well considering both of the C teams got top 10 and both of the B teams got top 15 last year at nats.
Re: Pennsylvania 2009
Posted: January 20th, 2009, 9:18 am
by EastStroudsburg13
Don't forget about NE in B, guys. We have some good teams as well that have placed high at states (Stroudsburg-4th, J.T.Lambert-6th

, Greater Nanticoke-10th, Wyoming Area-11th). Wyoming Area only missed the top 10 by three points. SE may be more competitive than us, but after Sewickley and Shady Side in SW, there's almost nothing. I would say that in order of competitiveness in B, it's SE, then NE, SW, CE, C, and NW. In C it's a different story, as it's SE first and everyone else is just about even.
Re: Pennsylvania 2009
Posted: January 20th, 2009, 1:52 pm
by crabnebula143
binary010101 wrote:How do you think PA is going to do at Nationals?
Probably really well, at least C division.
Last year Harrinton + Pencrest did really well last year, so whatever team who goes to national will undoubteley do well.
for B:
Sewickly will probalby do really well in nationals, its almost impossible for them not to go.
PA's actually a really competitive state.
Re: Pennsylvania 2009
Posted: January 20th, 2009, 2:38 pm
by binary010101
Compared to something like Kentucky or Alabama... Yeah.
