How Could We Improve Scioly.org?
-
- Member
- Posts: 158
- Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2018 6:18 pm
- Division: B
- State: PA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: How Could We Improve Scioly.org?
Why is the color on the font color thing when you reply spelled colour, this is america not europe, there is a difference
Medals
Invitationals: 9
Regionals: 5
States: 1
Nationals: 1
National Medals
2018: 5th in Towers
2019: Could have gotten top 3 in Boomilevers and Gliders if my team made it
Invitationals: 9
Regionals: 5
States: 1
Nationals: 1
National Medals
2018: 5th in Towers
2019: Could have gotten top 3 in Boomilevers and Gliders if my team made it

-
- Member
- Posts: 346
- Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2017 8:24 am
- Division: C
- State: PA
- Has thanked: 16 times
- Been thanked: 5 times
Re: How Could We Improve Scioly.org?
Has the old board website always been down?
MIT '25
MIT Wright Stuff ES '22
BirdSO Wright Stuff ES '22
MIT Wright Stuff ES '22
BirdSO Wright Stuff ES '22
-
- Administrator
- Posts: 2405
- Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2014 3:12 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: WA
- Pronouns: He/Him/His
- Has thanked: 165 times
- Been thanked: 732 times
Re: How Could We Improve Scioly.org?
I can relate to disorganization being inconvenient but we also want to make the site accessible by those who are new. Getting your questions answered when you first joined may have encouraged you to stay.MadCow2357 wrote:2. Organization of threads is super important. Perhaps you could make it so only admins, moderators, exalted members, and members with 100+ posts can make new topics/threads. Because many "noobs" come on here, don't bother reading past posts, and ask questions that have been answered 10+ times (I know because I was like this last year).
This would be nice to have, but it would be more work to roll out new features consistently. If we were to introduce a new feature, we'd have to make it compatible with many web browsers, a couple mobile operating systems and screen sizes. To make things manageable while still providing a decent experience for you, we've worked on making the site more mobile friendly.MadCow2357 wrote:1. An app would be a good idea, as people are more likely to use an app than click on a website frequently. That's just my psychological guess based on my experiences and observations.
This functionality is included in the forum software we use and not added by ourselves. As East mentioned, we use these capabilities judiciously. If a long post has a link to SO rules but is otherwise useful, I'd rather do the editing and take the link out than delete the entire post.Paypog wrote:I have one problem with this website. The mods (AHEM EAST) are able to edit posts, which means even if I'm saying something completely harmless, they can (and have) changed the post to mess with me. It's very unsettling and really causes some internal scarring every time it occurs. Therefore, I believe that mods should be able to delete posts, but not directly change them. Thank you for your valuable time. :)
The forums use a British English language pack. I think this is a small difference that we can live with.Cow481 wrote:Why is the color on the font color thing when you reply spelled colour, this is america not europe, there is a difference
"One of the ways that I believe people express their appreciation to the rest of humanity is to make something wonderful and put it out there." – Steve Jobs
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 4315
- Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2014 12:48 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: GA
- Has thanked: 216 times
- Been thanked: 75 times
Re: How Could We Improve Scioly.org?
It's been down for about a year or so, I don't know why.CrayolaCrayon wrote:Has the old board website always been down?
-
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 774
- Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2017 9:09 am
- Division: C
- State: RI
- Has thanked: 211 times
- Been thanked: 56 times
Re: How Could We Improve Scioly.org?
As an afterthought, maybe you could make it so that all topics need to be approved by moderators before being created, kinda like the Polling Place.MadCow2357 wrote: 2. Organization of threads is super important. Perhaps you could make it so only admins, moderators, exalted members, and members with 100+ posts can make new topics/threads. Because many "noobs" come on here, don't bother reading past posts, and ask questions that have been answered 10+ times (I know because I was like this last year).
-
- Member
- Posts: 154
- Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2018 2:30 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: TN
- Pronouns: He/Him/His
- Has thanked: 90 times
- Been thanked: 55 times
Re: How Could We Improve Scioly.org?
Except posting games... They're sorta-spam and all anyways, so...MadCow2357 wrote:As an afterthought, maybe you could make it so that all topics need to be approved by moderators before being created, kinda like the Polling Place.MadCow2357 wrote: 2. Organization of threads is super important. Perhaps you could make it so only admins, moderators, exalted members, and members with 100+ posts can make new topics/threads. Because many "noobs" come on here, don't bother reading past posts, and ask questions that have been answered 10+ times (I know because I was like this last year).
John 5:46-47
Eagle Scout
Colorado School of Mines
Let's go, Brandon!

Eagle Scout
Colorado School of Mines
Let's go, Brandon!
See Wiki

-
- Member
- Posts: 732
- Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2018 11:25 am
- Division: Grad
- State: IL
- Pronouns: He/Him/His
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 44 times
Re: How Could We Improve Scioly.org?
I think this could be a good idea as it will slow down bot spam but make it that someone has to do like 20+ posts total...Things2do wrote:Except posting games... They're sorta-spam and all anyways, so...MadCow2357 wrote:As an afterthought, maybe you could make it so that all topics need to be approved by moderators before being created, kinda like the Polling Place.MadCow2357 wrote: 2. Organization of threads is super important. Perhaps you could make it so only admins, moderators, exalted members, and members with 100+ posts can make new topics/threads. Because many "noobs" come on here, don't bother reading past posts, and ask questions that have been answered 10+ times (I know because I was like this last year).
A Science Olympian from 2015 - 2019 CLCSO Alumni
Medal Count:30
IL PPP/Mission Assistant State Supervisor.
CLC Div. B Tournament Director.
President of The Builder Cult.
"A true Science Olympian embraces a life without Science Olympiad by becoming a part of Science Olympiad itself"- Me
Medal Count:30
IL PPP/Mission Assistant State Supervisor.
CLC Div. B Tournament Director.
President of The Builder Cult.
"A true Science Olympian embraces a life without Science Olympiad by becoming a part of Science Olympiad itself"- Me
-
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 774
- Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2017 9:09 am
- Division: C
- State: RI
- Has thanked: 211 times
- Been thanked: 56 times
Re: How Could We Improve Scioly.org?
Seconded. Bots create advertising topics, and new members often create unneeded new topics in order to ask questions which have already been answered. I understand that we need to cut new members some slack, but they should still know to post their questions in the general event forums.TheChiScientist wrote:I think this could be a good idea as it will slow down bot spam but make it that someone has to do like 20+ posts total...Things2do wrote:Except posting games... They're sorta-spam and all anyways, so...MadCow2357 wrote:
As an afterthought, maybe you could make it so that all topics need to be approved by moderators before being created, kinda like the Polling Place.
Example:
viewtopic.php?f=290&t=12929&p=370225#p370225
-
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 736
- Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2018 12:24 pm
- Division: C
- State: NJ
- Pronouns: He/Him/His
- Has thanked: 189 times
- Been thanked: 143 times
Re: How Could We Improve Scioly.org?
Somebody's posting really weird links on the wright stuff c forum...
-
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 774
- Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2017 9:09 am
- Division: C
- State: RI
- Has thanked: 211 times
- Been thanked: 56 times
Re: How Could We Improve Scioly.org?
Spam bot, just report the posts and it will get taken care of.builderguy135 wrote:Somebody's posting really weird links on the wright stuff c forum...