Optics B/C

User avatar
John Richardsim
Wiki/Gallery Moderator Emeritus
Wiki/Gallery Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 736
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 10:54 am
Division: Grad
State: MI
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Optics B/C

Post by John Richardsim »

Pettywap wrote:Hellloooooooo,
For Div. B, is it necessary to know the percentage of reflection in a refractive problem? (in refraction part of the incident ray, part of it is reflected). Basically do we need to know the percentage that is reflected. (sorry if this is very confusing). I JUST NEED TO KNOW!!!!! ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;)
If I'm not mistaken, the reflectance of a surface is calculated using the Fresnel equations, which would be rather tedious to use in a question. The only manner in which this sort of topic has been asked on a test that I've seen is the special cases of total internal reflection and Brewster's angle.
"This is close enough to perfect for me." --Dave Stieb
keklord88
Member
Member
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2017 10:24 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Optics B/C

Post by keklord88 »

Does anyone know if we're allowed to use other tools to measure the angle besides just a simple protractor? (eg. digital angle gauge)
And what about a tape measure instead of a clunky ruler?
Jdoglloyd
Member
Member
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2017 6:45 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Optics B/C

Post by Jdoglloyd »

keklord88 wrote:Does anyone know if we're allowed to use other tools to measure the angle besides just a simple protractor? (eg. digital angle gauge)
And what about a tape measure instead of a clunky ruler?
Wouldn't a tape measure be clunkier? With the metal casing and all
I lik that
keklord88
Member
Member
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2017 10:24 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Optics B/C

Post by keklord88 »

Jdoglloyd wrote:
keklord88 wrote:Does anyone know if we're allowed to use other tools to measure the angle besides just a simple protractor? (eg. digital angle gauge)
And what about a tape measure instead of a clunky ruler?
Wouldn't a tape measure be clunkier? With the metal casing and all
The tape can be bent so you would make a "L" shape with the tape measure so that the casing would be out of the way. This way you can measure in tight spaces that you otherwise coudn't with an inflexible ruler. Horrible drawing showing what I mean: Image
User avatar
Adi1008
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 525
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2013 1:56 pm
Division: Grad
State: CA
Pronouns: He/Him/His
Has thanked: 151 times
Been thanked: 107 times

Re: Optics B/C

Post by Adi1008 »

keklord88 wrote:
Jdoglloyd wrote:
keklord88 wrote:Does anyone know if we're allowed to use other tools to measure the angle besides just a simple protractor? (eg. digital angle gauge)
And what about a tape measure instead of a clunky ruler?
Wouldn't a tape measure be clunkier? With the metal casing and all
The tape can be bent so you would make a "L" shape with the tape measure so that the casing would be out of the way. This way you can measure in tight spaces that you otherwise coudn't with an inflexible ruler. Horrible drawing showing what I mean: Image
You could also just use smaller rulers

I think tape measures are allowed (rule 2.b) since it counts as "any measuring tool"
Stanford University
University of Texas at Austin '22
Seven Lakes High School '18
Beckendorff Junior High '14
keklord88
Member
Member
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2017 10:24 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Optics B/C

Post by keklord88 »

Adi1008 wrote:
keklord88 wrote:
Jdoglloyd wrote:
Wouldn't a tape measure be clunkier? With the metal casing and all
The tape can be bent so you would make a "L" shape with the tape measure so that the casing would be out of the way. This way you can measure in tight spaces that you otherwise coudn't with an inflexible ruler. Horrible drawing showing what I mean:
You could also just use smaller rulers

I think tape measures are allowed (rule 2.b) since it counts as "any measuring tool"
Cool.
I guess the digital angle gauges could also be used since it's also a measuring tool.
Jdoglloyd
Member
Member
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2017 6:45 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Optics B/C

Post by Jdoglloyd »

keklord88 wrote:
Adi1008 wrote:
keklord88 wrote:
The tape can be bent so you would make a "L" shape with the tape measure so that the casing would be out of the way. This way you can measure in tight spaces that you otherwise coudn't with an inflexible ruler. Horrible drawing showing what I mean:
You could also just use smaller rulers

I think tape measures are allowed (rule 2.b) since it counts as "any measuring tool"
Cool.
I guess the digital angle gauges could also be used since it's also a measuring tool.
And yeah I mean those are gonna be the most accurate too
I lik that
jxxu20
Member
Member
Posts: 65
Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2017 2:54 pm
Division: C
State: NJ
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Optics B/C

Post by jxxu20 »

Hi all,

This is my first year doing Optics, and I'm not really sure on how the Event Supervisors will be running the event (I have NJ regionals @ UCC in less than 2 weeks). More specifically, I'm wondering -- based on your guys' experience -- how long/hard the tests are for Division B, and the topics that will be assessed. I know that the content assessed should align with the guidelines in the rules packet, but based on my limited experience, some of the material covered in tests are way harder than what I studied for (like some of the tests on the Test Exchange), while some tests are extremely easy. Moreover, how will the Event Supervisors be running the LSS? For example, how much time do we have to make calculations/place our mirrors down? I know that the rules state that "Participants must make all measurements ... within a 4-minute time period.", but in previous years, have Event Supervisors tweaked the time limit/constraints for the LSS setup?

Finally, I'm using a simple 45-degree mirror template with 4 mirrors (the template doesn't include reflecting off of a fifth mirror OR a barrier mirror, but using this template puts me on the safe side. However, the rules packet states "...15 points if the laser reflects off the barrier mirror." and says that each reflection off of a moveable mirror is worth 2 points -- so I'm basically sacrificing 17 pts off my total score even if I hit the target point spot-on). Based on your experience, what is the success rate for the laser actually being directed towards the target point, and what is the typical number of mirrors contestants use? Do contestants in Division B use the barrier mirror? (I know I'm putting out a weird question, but I want to see if I should stay with my 4-mirror template or change it based on others' performance.) Please note that this is a Division B tournament, not Division C, so we only have one barrier mirror.
Thanks for all of your help! I really appreciate it! :D

-- jxxu20
"Perhaps one did not want to be loved so much as to be understood." -- George Orwell, 1984

Events 2019: A&P, Heredity, Picture This, P&P
Events 2020: A&P, Astro, DG, Geo Mapping
User avatar
WhatScience?
Member
Member
Posts: 395
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2017 4:03 pm
Division: C
State: NJ
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Optics B/C

Post by WhatScience? »

jxxu20 wrote:Hi all,

This is my first year doing Optics, and I'm not really sure on how the Event Supervisors will be running the event (I have NJ regionals @ UCC in less than 2 weeks). More specifically, I'm wondering -- based on your guys' experience -- how long/hard the tests are for Division B, and the topics that will be assessed. I know that the content assessed should align with the guidelines in the rules packet, but based on my limited experience, some of the material covered in tests are way harder than what I studied for (like some of the tests on the Test Exchange), while some tests are extremely easy. Moreover, how will the Event Supervisors be running the LSS? For example, how much time do we have to make calculations/place our mirrors down? I know that the rules state that "Participants must make all measurements ... within a 4-minute time period.", but in previous years, have Event Supervisors tweaked the time limit/constraints for the LSS setup?

Finally, I'm using a simple 45-degree mirror template with 4 mirrors (the template doesn't include reflecting off of a fifth mirror OR a barrier mirror, but using this template puts me on the safe side. However, the rules packet states "...15 points if the laser reflects off the barrier mirror." and says that each reflection off of a moveable mirror is worth 2 points -- so I'm basically sacrificing 17 pts off my total score even if I hit the target point spot-on). Based on your experience, what is the success rate for the laser actually being directed towards the target point, and what is the typical number of mirrors contestants use? Do contestants in Division B use the barrier mirror? (I know I'm putting out a weird question, but I want to see if I should stay with my 4-mirror template or change it based on others' performance.) Please note that this is a Division B tournament, not Division C, so we only have one barrier mirror.
Thanks for all of your help! I really appreciate it! :D

-- jxxu20
Ayy my UCC people. I will be competing Optics B at UCC too. What school are you from? Will I be seeing you? I'm from HMS Anyway, for your question, take notes on the guidelines, take tests, and then for those tests whatever you don't know, study it and then add it to your binder. Rinse and repeat.
jxxu20
Member
Member
Posts: 65
Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2017 2:54 pm
Division: C
State: NJ
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Optics B/C

Post by jxxu20 »

Thanks! Do you have other advice on the LSS portion of the event? What should I expect from the Event Supervisor? Will they have multiple LSS's so that multiple teams can compete at once?
Also, I'm from HMS, which is Heritage Middle School (not Hillsborough, which is where you're from). Heritage is relatively new to SO, as this is our second year in the Olympiad. We're from northern NJ but for some reason NJSO moved us to UCC -- not sure why that happened. Last year we went to the NJIT tournament.
As to whether I'll be seeing you, I don't think so. Heritage is team #9 whereas Hillsborough is team #10, and participating teams have been grouped into 2 sessions. Teams 1-9 will be competing together and teams 10-18 will be competing together.

Fun fact: Wirt -- director of NJSO -- used to be the HMS principal!
"Perhaps one did not want to be loved so much as to be understood." -- George Orwell, 1984

Events 2019: A&P, Heredity, Picture This, P&P
Events 2020: A&P, Astro, DG, Geo Mapping

Return to “2018 Lab Events”