Page 11 of 20

Re: Scrambler B

Posted: February 16th, 2016, 1:02 pm
by Shanta
thx once again bernard

Re: Scrambler B

Posted: February 16th, 2016, 5:36 pm
by thomas_2002
Does the diagonal have to be 90 cm?

Re: Scrambler B

Posted: February 17th, 2016, 7:16 am
by InfiniCuber
thomas_2002 wrote:Does the diagonal have to be 90 cm?
Which diagonal are you referring to? The string diagonal if you get rid of one of your pulleys so you only have 2?

Re: Scrambler B

Posted: February 17th, 2016, 2:33 pm
by thomas_2002
InfiniCuber wrote:
thomas_2002 wrote:Does the diagonal have to be 90 cm?
Which diagonal are you referring to? The string diagonal if you get rid of one of your pulleys so you only have 2?
like from the top of the launcher to the bottom but diagonally

Re: Scrambler B

Posted: February 18th, 2016, 9:09 am
by InfiniCuber
thomas_2002 wrote:
InfiniCuber wrote:
thomas_2002 wrote:Does the diagonal have to be 90 cm?
Which diagonal are you referring to? The string diagonal if you get rid of one of your pulleys so you only have 2?
like from the top of the launcher to the bottom but diagonally
Well, that shouldn't necessarily be any particular distance, it varies from launcher to launcher. Just make sure it is taught when the whole set up is in the ready to launch position. 90 cm does seem close to what mine was, though.

Re: Scrambler B

Posted: February 18th, 2016, 11:08 am
by bernard
InfiniCuber wrote:
thomas_2002 wrote:
InfiniCuber wrote: Which diagonal are you referring to? The string diagonal if you get rid of one of your pulleys so you only have 2?
like from the top of the launcher to the bottom but diagonally
Well, that shouldn't necessarily be any particular distance, it varies from launcher to launcher. Just make sure it is taught when the whole set up is in the ready to launch position. 90 cm does seem close to what mine was, though.
thomas_2002 may be referencing rule 2.a., which limits the ready-to-run configuration of the Scrambler to no larger than 0.90 meters in any dimension. This means your diagonal is less than 0.90 meters, and overall it may be safe to make the entire launcher less than 0.90 meters in any dimension (maybe 0.85 m).

Re: Scrambler B

Posted: February 19th, 2016, 6:36 am
by InfiniCuber
bernard wrote:
InfiniCuber wrote:
thomas_2002 wrote: like from the top of the launcher to the bottom but diagonally
Well, that shouldn't necessarily be any particular distance, it varies from launcher to launcher. Just make sure it is taught when the whole set up is in the ready to launch position. 90 cm does seem close to what mine was, though.
thomas_2002 may be referencing rule 2.a., which limits the ready-to-run configuration of the Scrambler to no larger than 0.90 meters in any dimension. This means your diagonal is less than 0.90 meters, and overall it may be safe to make the entire launcher less than 0.90 meters in any dimension (maybe 0.85 m).
That makes a whole lot more sense, thanks for clarifying!

Re: Scrambler B

Posted: February 19th, 2016, 9:13 am
by abby1kanobe
Repost:

Re: Scrambler B
Postby chalker ยป Mon Dec 28, 2015 7:11 pm

SluffAndRuff wrote:
Thanks for the answer to my previous question.

So I was reading the rules and Rule 2.a. states that "the entire Scrambler, including the egg, must not exceed 0.90 m in any dimension."

My understanding is that the distance between any two points of the entire device must be less than 0.90 m, so diagonals count. However others I have talked to think that this means the Scrambler needs to fit in a 0.90 m cube, so only the height, width, and length dimensions count.

What's your understanding of this rule? Thanks!


I think you might have caught an error. Generally we would say something like the device should fit inside a 0.90 x 0.90 x 0.90 m cube, but I think there was an attempt to save some space / make it easier to read with the language you cite. I'm pretty sure the intention is still a .90 m cube, but I'll have to discuss with the committee.

Student Alumni
National Event Supervisor
National Physical Sciences Rules Committee Chair

Re: Scrambler B

Posted: February 20th, 2016, 5:53 pm
by DuckMaster
Are brakes REQUIRED for your car?

Re: Scrambler B

Posted: February 20th, 2016, 6:34 pm
by dragonfruit35
DuckMaster wrote:Are brakes REQUIRED for your car?
Not necessarily, but your car will most likely be more accurate if you do.