any feedback would be helpful!

I was under the impression that endemic means that the disease is regularly found in a certain place, but hyperendemic means that a disease is found at a high constant rate. Thus, a hyperendemic is a more severe endemic. However, I may be wrong...deezee wrote:I got a question: What is the difference between hyperendemic and endemic? I feel like hyperendemic means higher prevalance compared to OTHER CITIES. Endemic is comparing the city to itself over the past times.
Yes, that's correct. The opposite (fairly low rates) would be hypoendemic, and in the middle of the two is mesoendemic.illusionofconfusion wrote:I was under the impression that endemic means that the disease is regularly found in a certain place, but hyperendemic means that a disease is found at a high constant rate. Thus, a hyperendemic is a more severe endemic. However, I may be wrong...deezee wrote:I got a question: What is the difference between hyperendemic and endemic? I feel like hyperendemic means higher prevalance compared to OTHER CITIES. Endemic is comparing the city to itself over the past times.
Infinity Flat wrote:Yes, that's correct. The opposite (fairly low rates) would be hypoendemic, and in the middle of the two is mesoendemic.illusionofconfusion wrote:I was under the impression that endemic means that the disease is regularly found in a certain place, but hyperendemic means that a disease is found at a high constant rate. Thus, a hyperendemic is a more severe endemic. However, I may be wrong...deezee wrote:I got a question: What is the difference between hyperendemic and endemic? I feel like hyperendemic means higher prevalance compared to OTHER CITIES. Endemic is comparing the city to itself over the past times.
I don't believe there's any clear objective boundary between them, however.
I would think that it would be comparing the new, higher or lower rates to the normal endemic rate of the city itself. As in, if the normal (endemic) level is 20 cases per 100,000, then the current level of 100 cases per 100,000 is hyperendemic. I think it is a way of describing the level in comparison with itself normally.deezee wrote: so hyper and hypo endemic is comparing the regular amount of cases to OTHER cities? Endemic usually compares the # of cases to the city itself, so hyperendemic is sort of different.
Thanks guys!
Epidemics involve a sudden increase in the number of cases, more than expected. In an endemic, the rate of infection is constant over time.deezee wrote:but if the number of cases was higher than the 20 per 100000, lets say it was 200 per 100000, wouldn't that be a epidemic?