Take another look at the scores. Among a field of (iirc) 48 teams, the teams in contention for second place are all generally around 220; aka a bit less competitive to the current Div C teams in New York (adjusting for the larger number of teams and two additional state events in that area, which would likely bring the NY C point scores down to the 220s range, and then readjusting in the opposite direction based on the good, but relatively less good performance of NC B teams at nationals). Piedmont is an anomaly in terms of how they compete nationally, so their unusually low scores can probably be discounted on the basis that if a Div C NY team was doing similarly well (which, adjusting for the better performance of NY Div C teams relative to non-Piedmont NC B teams at nationals, would equate to NY C winning nationals with ~170 points, based on how Piedmont did in 2015) they would also have a similar score (~75, accounting for a slight size difference and more events) at state.texas wrote:Yeah, but I couldn't really think of any other states.bhavjain wrote:Isn't NC mostly known for Piedmont?texas wrote:These aren't in order, but here's ten competitive states: Texas, New York, Ohio, Illinois, California, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Wisconsin, Virginia (or NC, I haven't decided yet).
TL;DR - NC B is slightly less competitive than NY C, hence why I ranked NC B at 9th (as East noted above, my original NY C ranking of 3rd was too high).




