Page 2 of 5
Re: Scores
Posted: April 25th, 2016, 6:54 pm
by dragonfruit35
gelinasdynamickid wrote:Abdullah404 wrote:gelinasdynamickid wrote:Oh my, back to the drawing board. (937 points and heading to nats
)
What design are u using?
I don't know what you mean design. can you elaborate?
Maybe like size, materials, etc...?
Re: Scores
Posted: April 26th, 2016, 12:53 pm
by gelinasdynamickid
dragon_fruit35 wrote:gelinasdynamickid wrote:Abdullah404 wrote:
What design are u using?
I don't know what you mean design. can you elaborate?
Maybe like size, materials, etc...?
Immmmm like small and aluminum and like stuff
Re: Scores
Posted: May 1st, 2016, 1:44 pm
by DankMcIntosh
We got 650ish at States for third place.
Re: Scores
Posted: May 1st, 2016, 5:11 pm
by dragonfruit35
DankMcIntosh wrote:We got 650ish at States for third place.
Nice. Ours probably got around 550 for 9th
our timewaster COMPLETELY FAILED.
Re: Scores
Posted: May 1st, 2016, 5:49 pm
by DankMcIntosh
dragon_fruit35 wrote:DankMcIntosh wrote:We got 650ish at States for third place.
Nice. Ours probably got around 550 for 9th
our timewaster COMPLETELY FAILED.
That's too bad. There's not to much competition at ID states
We're working on ours rn for nationals, and we already have 9 score-able transfers out of 12. We are on track. Also a correction. There was some partner jumbling - the current box I'm working on got third. My signature is a disclaimer.
Re: Scores
Posted: May 1st, 2016, 6:22 pm
by sciolyFTW_aku
DankMcIntosh wrote:and we already have 9 score-able transfers out of 12.
Um, there are 18 possible scoreable transfers.
Re: Scores
Posted: May 3rd, 2016, 1:38 pm
by dragonfruit35
DankMcIntosh wrote:dragon_fruit35 wrote:DankMcIntosh wrote:We got 650ish at States for third place.
Nice. Ours probably got around 550 for 9th
our timewaster COMPLETELY FAILED.
That's too bad. There's not to much competition at ID states
We're working on ours rn for nationals, and we already have 9 score-able transfers out of 12. We are on track. Also a correction. There was some partner jumbling - the current box I'm working on got third. My signature is a disclaimer.
Oh, VA is pretty competitive- first place had all 18 transfers, plus the box was like 45x45x45
Re: Scores
Posted: May 3rd, 2016, 7:58 pm
by sciolyFTW_aku
dragon_fruit35 wrote:
Oh, VA is pretty competitive- first place had all 18 transfers, plus the box was like 45x45x45
stingrayboss12 wrote:I have ("had", I should say) 18 tasks, and we got first at states. Our device was 40 x 50 x 50.5, and we received full points except for the fact that a ball flew out (-50 pt) and the time waster accidentally went about 42 seconds over the target time.
Unfortunately, our school got second at states overall, so no nats for me
.
I'm guessing you're talking about this guy...
Re: Scores
Posted: May 4th, 2016, 4:27 pm
by dragonfruit35
sciolyFTW_aku wrote:dragon_fruit35 wrote:
Oh, VA is pretty competitive- first place had all 18 transfers, plus the box was like 45x45x45
stingrayboss12 wrote:I have ("had", I should say) 18 tasks, and we got first at states. Our device was 40 x 50 x 50.5, and we received full points except for the fact that a ball flew out (-50 pt) and the time waster accidentally went about 42 seconds over the target time.
Unfortunately, our school got second at states overall, so no nats for me
.
I'm guessing you're talking about this guy...
Oh yeah... probably, given they were from the team that got second in VA. That's cool
Re: Scores
Posted: May 4th, 2016, 6:12 pm
by sciolyFTW_aku
Does anyone think that a score that's greater than 1200 is possible at nationals?