Re: Iolani Invitational
Posted: April 22nd, 2013, 10:53 am
The forensics test was badly written. Some of the questions were merely worded in a confusing manner, which would have been cleared up by a proctor if the test had been given in regular competition. Some questions were, however, impossibly mangled.
Case in point: the DNA fingerprinting portion of the test was centered around an image (taken from Google images) of a gel with several samples on it. Two of the "samples," including the one labeled as the DNA evidence found at the scene, were actually the ladders run in the gel for comparison purposes, to indicate the lengths of all of the DNA fragments present. It was therefore impossible to match any of the other labeled samples, the suspects, to the DNA found at the scene, and that part of the "collected evidence" could not be used in the analysis.
That being said, all of the other tests I took as part of this invitational were challenging and well written. I am very glad that my team was able to take part in it! This test, however, doesn't seem to have been proofread at all. Even a cursory second glance would have fixed some of the errors.
Case in point: the DNA fingerprinting portion of the test was centered around an image (taken from Google images) of a gel with several samples on it. Two of the "samples," including the one labeled as the DNA evidence found at the scene, were actually the ladders run in the gel for comparison purposes, to indicate the lengths of all of the DNA fragments present. It was therefore impossible to match any of the other labeled samples, the suspects, to the DNA found at the scene, and that part of the "collected evidence" could not be used in the analysis.
That being said, all of the other tests I took as part of this invitational were challenging and well written. I am very glad that my team was able to take part in it! This test, however, doesn't seem to have been proofread at all. Even a cursory second glance would have fixed some of the errors.