time

User avatar
Fossil Freak 25
Member
Member
Posts: 71
Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 6:03 pm
Division: C
State: WA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: time

Post by Fossil Freak 25 »

It would probably take an efficacy of like 120-130 to medal
Go Cougs!
Top
thsom
Member
Member
Posts: 241
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 10:26 am
Division: C
State: IL
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: time

Post by thsom »

Fossil Freak 25 wrote:It would probably take an efficacy of like 120-130 to medal
What are your predictions for a winning div. c tower efficiency?
Top
User avatar
havenguy
Member
Member
Posts: 456
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2011 2:06 pm
Division: Grad
State: PA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: time

Post by havenguy »

Actually, I think it would take around a 100-110 to medal. Last year, for div. B, the winning tower efficiency was about 45, meaning a 5 gram tower that held everything. This year, the towers are most likely 20 cm taller. An efficiency between 120 and 130 would mean towers that are between 5.25 and 5.5 grams. It seems extremely unlikely that there would be more than one tower that can be that light.
University of Pennsylvania Class of 2020
Strath Haven High School Class of 2016

2016 States Results:
Invasive Species: 1st
Dynamic Planet: 1st
Disease Detectives: 5th
Anatomy: 6th

Team Place: 4th
Top

Return to “Towers B/C”