Scioly.org

bearasauras wrote:It'll be on April 14, 2018

Thanks bearasauras.

My school is awfully bureaucratic and requires way to much head time to process any possible field trip requests

SOPomo wrote:It was a three point win, and like Random Human said, Kennedy Gold got 23 on Roller Coaster which was over 1/4 their entire score (but got 1st on Kennedy Yellow, their B team, so there's that balancing act to look forward to for Mira Loma in January).

Kennedy 1 and 2 took 1st and 3rd in roller coaster at the Ladera Vista Invitational so they obviously got their device optimized. The two devices had 57 and 48 cm of gaps respectively so will be tough to beat. I am sure they will get better.

As for finals at LV, Jeffrey Trail was 1st by a big margin over Kennedy 1 who beat Kraemer by about 20 points (the roller coaster was the difference).

Mira Loma Div B:

1. Kennedy Gold (90)
2. Kraemer Gold (144)
3. Miller Black (155)
4. Churchill Gold (194)
5. Churchill Purple (221)

Kennedy also thinks their Wright Stuff scores were mis-managed and they should have had a 1st instead of 12th. So their margin could be bigger.

I don't have access to Div C yet, but Troy won, I think Mountain View 2nd, I dunno though, a lot of people were distractingly leaving.

SOPomo wrote:Mira Loma Div B:

1. Kennedy Gold (90)
2. Kraemer Gold (144)
3. Miller Black (155)
4. Churchill Gold (194)
5. Churchill Purple (221)

Kennedy also thinks their Wright Stuff scores were mis-managed and they should have had a 1st instead of 12th. So their margin could be bigger.

I don't have access to Div C yet, but Troy won, I think Mountain View 2nd, I dunno though, a lot of people were distractingly leaving.

I'm hearing Mira Loma did really badly, can anyone else confirm and does anyone have any theories if this is true?

Rêveur wrote: I'm hearing Mira Loma did really badly, can anyone else confirm and does anyone have any theories if this is true?

The test folder didn't have the C results, so I can't comment as to what they look like. They did have three teams there, which I believe is more than in the past ML invites. Dunno if that spread themselves thin or anything but Troy being Troy they got 1st.

SOPomo wrote:

Rêveur wrote: I'm hearing Mira Loma did really badly, can anyone else confirm and does anyone have any theories if this is true?

The test folder didn't have the C results, so I can't comment as to what they look like. They did have three teams there, which I believe is more than in the past ML invites. Dunno if that spread themselves thin or anything but Troy being Troy they got 1st.

Troy 1st
Mtn View 2nd
Palo Alto 3rd
Camus 4th
Monta Vista 5th

Notes: Mira Loma had three teams and by taking the composite best score from each event, their team would have easily finished 2nd. Troy easily won the competition beating Mtn View by 54 points. Troy had two teams that had almost the same exact score and their composite team would have easily beaten Mira Loma's composite team.

This year's NorCal should be interesting, considering what happened at GGSO

https://doc-00-18-docs.googleuserconten ... hqfabt227e

Division C Sacramento regional score sheet

Does anyone have raw scores for the ML invitational? If so, please PM me.