Re: PICTURES, SCORES, VIDEOS!!!
Posted: November 18th, 2017, 12:02 pm
1763. 9.02 grams - 5kg + 10.9kg
Science Olympiad Student Center
https://scioly.org:443/forums/
Maybe...Random Human wrote:4k? Definitely not. Looking towards upper 3k'swlsguy wrote:Based on preliminary testing, I would agree. 4000 seems possible if well builtRaleway wrote:I predict some crazy guy gets a 4,000 with a crazy 5g tower. Most scores at nats I feel will revolve around the 2.5k mark (a slightly more than 7g tower w/ bonus) at the 1-15th places? That would be a pretty good score. (This is Div C)
Did you use bonus.wlsguy wrote:Maybe...Random Human wrote:4k? Definitely not. Looking towards upper 3k'swlsguy wrote:
Based on preliminary testing, I would agree. 4000 seems possible if well built
Our initial test tower built to confirm the design (prior to making a fixture) scored a 2620 and it was hastily built in about 3 hours...
I will stick to my 4000 prediction for the Nationals winner.
B im guessing?cheese wrote:Tested a tower today. Not going to give much detail, but 8390g + 5000g bonus / 5.44g = 2461.4 efficiency, not bad for the first tower this year. I used all X's, 1/8" legs, and 1/16 x 1/32 braces.
yupRandom Human wrote:B im guessing?cheese wrote:Tested a tower today. Not going to give much detail, but 8390g + 5000g bonus / 5.44g = 2461.4 efficiency, not bad for the first tower this year. I used all X's, 1/8" legs, and 1/16 x 1/32 braces.
Per the video, this must be at Boyceville, with (presumably) Marconnet et al running it. It also looks like you finished in first place.cheese wrote:2180.12 competition tower: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ziyevg ... sp=sharing
Correct.Unome wrote:Per the video, this must be at Boyceville, with (presumably) Marconnet et al running it. It also looks like you finished in first place.cheese wrote:2180.12 competition tower: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ziyevg ... sp=sharing