Page 2 of 2
Re: Princeton Invitational [PUSO]
Posted: February 4th, 2017, 7:50 pm
by Adi1008
kenniky wrote:Wow, Harriton got blown up. Worse placing than at MIT...
Unless their team wasn't stacked
They took three no-shows in building events. There's a myriad of things that could explain something like that - people missing the tournament, things breaking on the way there, etc. No reason to think Harriton is any worse
Re: Princeton Invitational [PUSO]
Posted: February 4th, 2017, 7:52 pm
by kenniky
Adi1008 wrote:kenniky wrote:Wow, Harriton got blown up. Worse placing than at MIT...
Unless their team wasn't stacked
They took three no-shows in building events. There's a myriad of things that could explain something like that - people missing the tournament, things, breaking on the way there, etc. No reason to think Harriton is any worse
Yeah, if you see my edit I noticed that after I posted.
That's actually pretty impressive then, getting 4th (and so close to 3rd) with three no-shows
Re: Princeton Invitational [PUSO]
Posted: February 4th, 2017, 8:03 pm
by Adi1008
kenniky wrote:Adi1008 wrote:kenniky wrote:Wow, Harriton got blown up. Worse placing than at MIT...
Unless their team wasn't stacked
They took three no-shows in building events. There's a myriad of things that could explain something like that - people missing the tournament, things, breaking on the way there, etc. No reason to think Harriton is any worse
Yeah, if you see my edit I noticed that after I posted.
That's actually pretty impressive then, getting 4th (and so close to 3rd) with three no-shows
Haha yeah I posted that before your edit, sorry. And yeah, definitely quite impressive
Re: Princeton Invitational [PUSO]
Posted: February 4th, 2017, 8:29 pm
by maxxxxx
Adi1008 wrote:kenniky wrote:Adi1008 wrote:
They took three no-shows in building events. There's a myriad of things that could explain something like that - people missing the tournament, things, breaking on the way there, etc. No reason to think Harriton is any worse
Yeah, if you see my edit I noticed that after I posted.
That's actually pretty impressive then, getting 4th (and so close to 3rd) with three no-shows
Haha yeah I posted that before your edit, sorry. And yeah, definitely quite impressive
Considering they got 10th place or worse in 4 events they medaled in at MIT, I'd be willing to bet not everyone from that team competed today. They'll be competing against WWP-South and Montgomery again at SOUP in two weeks, so we'll get another chance to see how they compare.
Re: Princeton Invitational [PUSO]
Posted: February 4th, 2017, 9:05 pm
by RestingDoll
maxxxxx wrote:Adi1008 wrote:kenniky wrote:
Yeah, if you see my edit I noticed that after I posted.
That's actually pretty impressive then, getting 4th (and so close to 3rd) with three no-shows
Haha yeah I posted that before your edit, sorry. And yeah, definitely quite impressive
Considering they got 10th place or worse in 4 events they medaled in at MIT, I'd be willing to bet not everyone from that team competed today. They'll be competing against WWP-South and Montgomery again at SOUP in two weeks, so we'll get another chance to see how they compare.
You would be very correct in saying that ^^. Princeton was a fun experience and the tests were super well written. Looking forward to seeing you all at SOUP!
Re: Princeton Invitational [PUSO]
Posted: February 5th, 2017, 8:26 am
by EastStroudsburg13
Sort of under the radar, but Abington Heights looks solid. Could be a decent shout for first place in Northeast PA and possibly top 10 at states.