Fossils B/C
- amerikestrel
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 606
- Joined: August 17th, 2009, 7:10 am
- Division: C
- State: PA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Fossils B/C
The mammoth is much taller than the mastodon.
Last edited by amerikestrel on January 20th, 2010, 6:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Not competing in the 2011-12 season.
2011 B division PA State Ornithology and Fossils champ!
Medal count: 14
2011 B division PA State Ornithology and Fossils champ!
Medal count: 14
- Deeisenberg
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 237
- Joined: April 29th, 2007, 7:23 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: PA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 2 times
Re: Fossils B/C
The teeth are very different, also, while somewhate more subtle, the curvature of the tusks are different.
Events: Herpetology, Fossils, Entomology, Rocks & Minerals, Ornithology, Ecology
Nationals 2008: 1st in Herpetology
Nationals 2009: 1st in Herpetology, 2nd in Fossils
Harriton Class of 2010
Nationals 2008: 1st in Herpetology
Nationals 2009: 1st in Herpetology, 2nd in Fossils
Harriton Class of 2010
- googlyfrog
- Member
- Posts: 161
- Joined: August 13th, 2009, 8:55 am
- Division: C
- State: PA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
- Deeisenberg
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 237
- Joined: April 29th, 2007, 7:23 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: PA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 2 times
Re: Fossils B/C
Mucrospirifer is more or less a 180 degree angle in the back on the axis of the hinge, platystrophia is not.googlyfrog wrote:Mucrospirifer and Platystrophia look somewhat alike and I keep messing them up.
Events: Herpetology, Fossils, Entomology, Rocks & Minerals, Ornithology, Ecology
Nationals 2008: 1st in Herpetology
Nationals 2009: 1st in Herpetology, 2nd in Fossils
Harriton Class of 2010
Nationals 2008: 1st in Herpetology
Nationals 2009: 1st in Herpetology, 2nd in Fossils
Harriton Class of 2010
- gneissisnice
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 930
- Joined: March 11th, 2008, 9:10 am
- Division: Grad
- State: NY
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 13 times
Re: Fossils B/C
They're actually pretty distinct.Deeisenberg wrote:Mucrospirifer is more or less a 180 degree angle in the back on the axis of the hinge, platystrophia is not.googlyfrog wrote:Mucrospirifer and Platystrophia look somewhat alike and I keep messing them up.
Mucrospirifer is more elongated, and platystrophia is more zig-zaggy (if that makes any sense). Go compare pictures of them to see what I mean,
2009 events:
Fossils: 1st @ reg. 3rd @ states (stupid dinosaurs...) 5th @ nats.
Dynamic: 1st @ reg. 19thish @ states, 18th @ nats
Herpetology (NOT the study of herpes): NA
Enviro Chem: 39th @ states =(
Cell Bio: 9th @ reg. 18th @ nats
Remote: 6th @ states 3rd @ Nats
Ecology: 5th @ Nats
Fossils: 1st @ reg. 3rd @ states (stupid dinosaurs...) 5th @ nats.
Dynamic: 1st @ reg. 19thish @ states, 18th @ nats
Herpetology (NOT the study of herpes): NA
Enviro Chem: 39th @ states =(
Cell Bio: 9th @ reg. 18th @ nats
Remote: 6th @ states 3rd @ Nats
Ecology: 5th @ Nats
- googlyfrog
- Member
- Posts: 161
- Joined: August 13th, 2009, 8:55 am
- Division: C
- State: PA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Fossils B/C
Yeah, I see what you mean, thanks!gneissisnice wrote:They're actually pretty distinct.Deeisenberg wrote:Mucrospirifer is more or less a 180 degree angle in the back on the axis of the hinge, platystrophia is not.googlyfrog wrote:Mucrospirifer and Platystrophia look somewhat alike and I keep messing them up.
Mucrospirifer is more elongated, and platystrophia is more zig-zaggy (if that makes any sense). Go compare pictures of them to see what I mean,
Does anyone know if there's a difference (besides color) between gryphaea and exogyra? The only difference I can get is that gryphaea is more twisted and slightly flatter. Sorry for all the questions about differences, I'm sure this will be the last.
-
- Member
- Posts: 181
- Joined: December 29th, 2008, 9:53 am
- Division: C
- State: SC
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Fossils B/C
Exogyra is usually larger than Gryphea and Exogyra has a more layered pattern on it.
DOUBLE RAINBOW
- amerikestrel
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 606
- Joined: August 17th, 2009, 7:10 am
- Division: C
- State: PA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Fossils B/C
I agree, the exogyra seems to have more distinct layers than the gryphea. If you don't understand what I mean, look at two pictures of them side by side.
Not competing in the 2011-12 season.
2011 B division PA State Ornithology and Fossils champ!
Medal count: 14
2011 B division PA State Ornithology and Fossils champ!
Medal count: 14
- Deeisenberg
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 237
- Joined: April 29th, 2007, 7:23 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: PA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 2 times
Re: Fossils B/C
Gryphaea is symmetric about the plane it rotates on, exogrya is not.
Events: Herpetology, Fossils, Entomology, Rocks & Minerals, Ornithology, Ecology
Nationals 2008: 1st in Herpetology
Nationals 2009: 1st in Herpetology, 2nd in Fossils
Harriton Class of 2010
Nationals 2008: 1st in Herpetology
Nationals 2009: 1st in Herpetology, 2nd in Fossils
Harriton Class of 2010
- E Edgar
- Member
- Posts: 89
- Joined: March 17th, 2008, 3:21 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: IN
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Fossils B/C
I have seen a gryphaea that are slightly asymmetric about their plane of rotation but, yes, this tends to be pretty reliable.Deeisenberg wrote:Gryphaea is symmetric about the plane it rotates on, exogrya is not.
Also, look at the point where the shell begins coiling (the coils are at their smallest). Exogyra often coils outwards as in the image below.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7158c/7158cbefce1ee6a3742ae0c860472f6568a40e18" alt="Image"
My 2010 National Results
Astronomy: 2nd
Physics Lab: 2nd
Technical Problem Solving: 6th
Fossils: 8th
Astronomy: 2nd
Physics Lab: 2nd
Technical Problem Solving: 6th
Fossils: 8th
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests