Anyone who takes the time to make a truly fantastic binder will not be relying on it alone. The sort of people who would only rely on their binder are the same people who would only rely on their field guide. Making an excellent binder requires well over 100 work hours. If you put that much time into your binder, you are really studying at the same time. To make an excellent binder means that you need to know what your doing, and making a good binder in the process leads to you knowing what your doing. Making a good binder is studying, I stand by that.sewforlife wrote:but I would have to say relying on ONLY a binder is very weak, and most of the time doesn't allow for a lot of studying for this many species and information. We'll just have to make do with what they allow.soobsession wrote:if theyre going to only allow a field guide, im going to be very mad.
Ornithology B/C
- Deeisenberg
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 237
- Joined: April 29th, 2007, 7:23 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: PA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 2 times
Re: Ornithology B/C
Events: Herpetology, Fossils, Entomology, Rocks & Minerals, Ornithology, Ecology
Nationals 2008: 1st in Herpetology
Nationals 2009: 1st in Herpetology, 2nd in Fossils
Harriton Class of 2010
Nationals 2008: 1st in Herpetology
Nationals 2009: 1st in Herpetology, 2nd in Fossils
Harriton Class of 2010
- soobsession
- Member
- Posts: 407
- Joined: March 21st, 2009, 2:33 pm
- Division: C
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Ornithology B/C
you can say that again. sew: in all honesty, i used my binder like twice during competition...Deeisenberg wrote:Anyone who takes the time to make a truly fantastic binder will not be relying on it alone. The sort of people who would only rely on their binder are the same people who would only rely on their field guide. Making an excellent binder requires well over 100 work hours. If you put that much time into your binder, you are really studying at the same time. To make an excellent binder means that you need to know what your doing, and making a good binder in the process leads to you knowing what your doing. Making a good binder is studying, I stand by that.sewforlife wrote:but I would have to say relying on ONLY a binder is very weak, and most of the time doesn't allow for a lot of studying for this many species and information. We'll just have to make do with what they allow.soobsession wrote:if theyre going to only allow a field guide, im going to be very mad.

"Do or do not. There is no try" -Yoda


- Celeste
- Member
- Posts: 175
- Joined: April 24th, 2009, 3:09 pm
- Division: C
- State: NE
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Ornithology B/C
If we're allowed both a field guide and a binder, I think the teams that succeed at this will be the ones that can correctly balance the use of both resources. If you lean too heavily on one over the other, I don't think you'll do as well. One of the most difficult things would be finding the right information to put in the binder, so as to have as much information as possible, but not so much that finding the right fact is hard.
2011~Dynamic (1st Regional, 1st State, 36th Nats) ~Birds (1st, 2nd, 39th) ~Remote (1st, 3rd, 42nd) ~Wind Power (1st, 4th, x)
2010~Dynamic (1st Regional, 1st State) ~Egg-O (x, 6th) ~Birds (4th, 5th) ~Remote (1st, 1st)
2009~Egg-O (11th State, 36th Nats) ~Herp (6th, 44th) ~Remote (x, 36th)
2010~Dynamic (1st Regional, 1st State) ~Egg-O (x, 6th) ~Birds (4th, 5th) ~Remote (1st, 1st)
2009~Egg-O (11th State, 36th Nats) ~Herp (6th, 44th) ~Remote (x, 36th)
- Deeisenberg
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 237
- Joined: April 29th, 2007, 7:23 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: PA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 2 times
Re: Ornithology B/C
Honestly I completely disagree. If you truly make a magnificent binder, it should have ALL of the useful information from all available field guide resources. This can then be condensed to the point where the field guide is really no longer very useful. For instance in Fossils this 08-09, as well as in Herpetology 07-08, we really didn't use our field guides at all, in herpetology I doubt we used it once, despite this we came in 2nd and 1st respectively at Nationals. We did on occasion use the field guide for herpetology, but that was only because it we put a quick reference sheet for fossil ranges on the cover.Celeste wrote:If we're allowed both a field guide and a binder, I think the teams that succeed at this will be the ones that can correctly balance the use of both resources. If you lean too heavily on one over the other, I don't think you'll do as well. One of the most difficult things would be finding the right information to put in the binder, so as to have as much information as possible, but not so much that finding the right fact is hard.
Note: I am not bringing up our placings for the purpose of bragging, I actually really hate it when people do that. The only reason I mention it is because it is a clear example that supports my point against the statement that "I think the teams that succeed at this will be the ones that can correctly balance the use of both resources".
Events: Herpetology, Fossils, Entomology, Rocks & Minerals, Ornithology, Ecology
Nationals 2008: 1st in Herpetology
Nationals 2009: 1st in Herpetology, 2nd in Fossils
Harriton Class of 2010
Nationals 2008: 1st in Herpetology
Nationals 2009: 1st in Herpetology, 2nd in Fossils
Harriton Class of 2010
- E Edgar
- Member
- Posts: 89
- Joined: March 17th, 2008, 3:21 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: IN
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Ornithology B/C
I would like to point out that the removal of binders from events is not unprecedented and in fact has been a general trend. For instance I believe that dynamic planet used to allow a binder but that this has recently been changed.
However, I agree with deeisenburg that binders should be allowed. My arguments for this are virtually all the same as deeisenburg's so there isn't much point reiterating them.
However, I agree with deeisenburg that binders should be allowed. My arguments for this are virtually all the same as deeisenburg's so there isn't much point reiterating them.
My 2010 National Results
Astronomy: 2nd
Physics Lab: 2nd
Technical Problem Solving: 6th
Fossils: 8th
Astronomy: 2nd
Physics Lab: 2nd
Technical Problem Solving: 6th
Fossils: 8th
- dudeincolorado
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 595
- Joined: January 31st, 2007, 6:27 pm
- Division: C
- State: CO
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Ornithology B/C
Eh. There's no use arguing over binders and field guides; whatever the rules are, will be the rules, can't change that. But, isn't that part of the challenge? My mindset is that if it works for you, keep it. If you feel like you're doing well equally relying on a field guide and a binder then all the power to you, same goes for the more binder heavy and guide heavy people too.
SO stressed!
-
- Member
- Posts: 7
- Joined: February 17th, 2009, 11:29 am
- Division: B
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Ornithology B/C
This is my first time doing Science Olympiad, so I was wondering how you're organizing the information. I did it by having each bird, their classification, length, weight, wingspan, other common names, basic description, breeding, migrating and wintering, population, food habits, and the basic ways to identify them. Should I add anything more, or is this ok? Thanks!
Events:
Solar System
Ornithology
Fossils
Dynamic Planet
Solar System
Ornithology
Fossils
Dynamic Planet
- duckiegirl2
- Member
- Posts: 116
- Joined: July 22nd, 2009, 1:36 pm
- Division: C
- State: TX
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Ornithology B/C
The Official List has come out now. Here's the link: http://soinc.org/sites/default/files/up ... -16-09.pdf sorry if it's late 

Last edited by duckiegirl2 on October 6th, 2009, 2:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Member
- Posts: 14
- Joined: July 28th, 2009, 11:05 pm
- Division: B
- State: CA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest