Is this going to apply to digital structures this year?sciolyperson1 wrote: ↑September 25th, 2020, 8:32 am From 2001:
"
The Winning boom was made by an amazing girl from california. It weighed 7.7 and held it all, so it was very high. 2nd was harriton with a 8. something boom, and 3rd was solon with a 9.6 gram boom. dont know any others
id love to chat about boom
steven
"
Source: https://scioly.org/obb/viewtopic.php?t=291&start=1#2
At this point in time, 15000g was "full weight" as well. However, score was determined by:
mass held/mass device + mass held/10
Boomilever B/C
- MadCow2357
- Exalted Member

- Posts: 776
- Joined: November 19th, 2017, 9:09 am
- Division: Grad
- State: RI
- Has thanked: 211 times
- Been thanked: 58 times
- Contact:
Re: Boomilever B/C
Current Director at GGSO | Contact us at [email protected]!
Mechanical Engineering @ Stanford
Barrington HS '23 & Gallagher MS '19
Mechanical Engineering @ Stanford
Barrington HS '23 & Gallagher MS '19
- sciolyperson1
- Exalted Member

- Posts: 1074
- Joined: April 23rd, 2018, 7:13 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: NJ
- Pronouns: He/Him/His
- Has thanked: 540 times
- Been thanked: 601 times
- Contact:
Re: Boomilever B/C
MadCow2357 wrote: ↑September 25th, 2020, 11:01 am Is this going to apply to digital structures this year?
- MadCow2357
- Exalted Member

- Posts: 776
- Joined: November 19th, 2017, 9:09 am
- Division: Grad
- State: RI
- Has thanked: 211 times
- Been thanked: 58 times
- Contact:
Re: Boomilever B/C
I know, I was just wondering why you suddenly posted something from 2001 lolsciolyperson1 wrote: ↑September 25th, 2020, 11:52 amMadCow2357 wrote: ↑September 25th, 2020, 11:01 am Is this going to apply to digital structures this year?
Current Director at GGSO | Contact us at [email protected]!
Mechanical Engineering @ Stanford
Barrington HS '23 & Gallagher MS '19
Mechanical Engineering @ Stanford
Barrington HS '23 & Gallagher MS '19
- sciolyperson1
- Exalted Member

- Posts: 1074
- Joined: April 23rd, 2018, 7:13 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: NJ
- Pronouns: He/Him/His
- Has thanked: 540 times
- Been thanked: 601 times
- Contact:
Re: Boomilever B/C
viewtopic.php?f=24&p=427491#p427491MadCow2357 wrote: ↑September 25th, 2020, 11:55 amI know, I was just wondering why you suddenly posted something from 2001 lolsciolyperson1 wrote: ↑September 25th, 2020, 11:52 amMadCow2357 wrote: ↑September 25th, 2020, 11:01 am Is this going to apply to digital structures this year?
- These users thanked the author sciolyperson1 for the post:
- sneepity (September 26th, 2020, 1:15 pm)
-
Godspeed
- Member

- Posts: 188
- Joined: February 20th, 2020, 10:16 pm
- Division: C
- State: CA
- Pronouns: He/Him/His
- Has thanked: 88 times
- Been thanked: 17 times
Re: Boomilever B/C
Hello everybody. Do the contact width lines only apply for the bottom portion of the Boomilever. By that I mean does the contact width line not matter for the J Hook part of the boomilever?
- AstroClarinet
- Member

- Posts: 67
- Joined: August 6th, 2020, 9:56 am
- Division: Grad
- Pronouns: He/Him/His
- Has thanked: 105 times
- Been thanked: 38 times
Re: Boomilever B/C
Rules 3.d and 4.e.III say that no part of the boomilever can touch between the contact width lines. The contact width lines also extend fully up the testing wall per 5.a.v. So I would say that the hook part of the boomi also can't touch the wall between the lines.
AstroClarinet's Userpage
Nats: Remote sensing 3rd 2x, Astronomy 6th, Cell Bio 3rd
Nats: Remote sensing 3rd 2x, Astronomy 6th, Cell Bio 3rd
Astro, Genes, Water, DigiStructures, Solar System, Boomi, Density, Eco, Optics, Towers, Microbe, Mission Possible
- xiangyu
- Member

- Posts: 276
- Joined: April 6th, 2019, 8:32 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: MI
- Pronouns: He/Him/His
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 6 times
Re: Boomilever B/C
Yep.AstroClarinet wrote: ↑September 27th, 2020, 4:29 amRules 3.d and 4.e.III say that no part of the boomilever can touch between the contact width lines. The contact width lines also extend fully up the testing wall per 5.a.v. So I would say that the hook part of the boomi also can't touch the wall between the lines.
Medal & Ribbon Count: 33
Former EGRHS Team Captain 2017-2021
https://scioly.org/wiki/index.php/User:Xiangyu
Former EGRHS Team Captain 2017-2021
https://scioly.org/wiki/index.php/User:Xiangyu
-
Godspeed
- Member

- Posts: 188
- Joined: February 20th, 2020, 10:16 pm
- Division: C
- State: CA
- Pronouns: He/Him/His
- Has thanked: 88 times
- Been thanked: 17 times
Re: Boomilever B/C
Wait but how does that work? if It's on the hook, then it's guaranteed to be in between the contact width lines, right?AstroClarinet wrote: ↑September 27th, 2020, 4:29 amRules 3.d and 4.e.III say that no part of the boomilever can touch between the contact width lines. The contact width lines also extend fully up the testing wall per 5.a.v. So I would say that the hook part of the boomi also can't touch the wall between the lines.
- Umaroth
- Exalted Member

- Posts: 402
- Joined: February 10th, 2018, 8:51 pm
- Division: C
- State: CA
- Pronouns: He/Him/His
- Has thanked: 170 times
- Been thanked: 327 times
Re: Boomilever B/C
But it's not touching the wall, it's touching the hookGodspeed wrote: ↑September 27th, 2020, 12:06 pmWait but how does that work? if It's on the hook, then it's guaranteed to be in between the contact width lines, right?AstroClarinet wrote: ↑September 27th, 2020, 4:29 amRules 3.d and 4.e.III say that no part of the boomilever can touch between the contact width lines. The contact width lines also extend fully up the testing wall per 5.a.v. So I would say that the hook part of the boomi also can't touch the wall between the lines.
- sneepity
- Member

- Posts: 173
- Joined: February 13th, 2020, 2:35 pm
- Division: C
- State: NY
- Pronouns: She/Her/Hers
- Has thanked: 950 times
- Been thanked: 204 times
Re: Boomilever B/C
It'll have to hang from the hook, so it's not the wall. All other parts will have to touch the wall for the boomi to carry the load.Umaroth wrote: ↑September 27th, 2020, 12:54 pmBut it's not touching the wall, it's touching the hookGodspeed wrote: ↑September 27th, 2020, 12:06 pmWait but how does that work? if It's on the hook, then it's guaranteed to be in between the contact width lines, right?AstroClarinet wrote: ↑September 27th, 2020, 4:29 am
Rules 3.d and 4.e.III say that no part of the boomilever can touch between the contact width lines. The contact width lines also extend fully up the testing wall per 5.a.v. So I would say that the hook part of the boomi also can't touch the wall between the lines.
B)
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests