Wright Stuff C
-
- Member
- Posts: 860
- Joined: June 16th, 2013, 12:35 pm
- Division: C
- State: MI
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 50 times
Re: Wright Stuff C
I completely agree with Xiangyu, Crayola and Jasp, reading several years of these forums will only take a few hours and will give a solid base of understanding of the event.
This should make for a good “Pandemic Project”. Also agree that it’s helpful and fun to build something to experiment with while reading (maybe, possibly a “Scraps” kit from J&H Aerospace that can be flown 1:30 - 2:30+ in your living room).
Brian T
This should make for a good “Pandemic Project”. Also agree that it’s helpful and fun to build something to experiment with while reading (maybe, possibly a “Scraps” kit from J&H Aerospace that can be flown 1:30 - 2:30+ in your living room).
Brian T
-
- Member
- Posts: 11
- Joined: December 30th, 2019, 7:00 pm
- Division: C
- State: NC
- Has thanked: 4 times
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Wright Stuff C
Ok, looks like I'm going to have a lot of questions
First off, is the propeller pitch essentially the angle of attack of the propeller blades? So on a Wright Stuff plane, you would have a fixed propeller pitch?
Also what would be benefits/consequences of increasing/decreasing your propeller length. I understand how the tips of a propeller rotate at a faster rpm than at the hub. Would that mean longer propellers would require a lower propeller pitch because the tips would be spinning faster?
First off, is the propeller pitch essentially the angle of attack of the propeller blades? So on a Wright Stuff plane, you would have a fixed propeller pitch?
Also what would be benefits/consequences of increasing/decreasing your propeller length. I understand how the tips of a propeller rotate at a faster rpm than at the hub. Would that mean longer propellers would require a lower propeller pitch because the tips would be spinning faster?
Last edited by AkshayB on July 9th, 2020, 11:50 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Member
- Posts: 860
- Joined: June 16th, 2013, 12:35 pm
- Division: C
- State: MI
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 50 times
Re: Wright Stuff C
Good to have a lot of questions. Angle of attack is relative to airflow.
A good primer on aerodynamics from NASA is https://www.grc.nasa.gov/www/k-12/airplane/bga.html
Explains concepts like angle of attack and includes some helpful graphics.
Larger diameter propeller primary benefit is efficiency. See affect of aspect ratio on wing efficiency. And, no, larger diameter does not necessarily mean pitch should be less. Study designs like AMA Limited Penny Plane (12” diameter and 20” pitch is typical; many other examples). Optimal pitch and pitch distribution for a particular design is determined by experimentation.
Good job. Study, study, study and keep asking questions.
Brian T
A good primer on aerodynamics from NASA is https://www.grc.nasa.gov/www/k-12/airplane/bga.html
Explains concepts like angle of attack and includes some helpful graphics.
Larger diameter propeller primary benefit is efficiency. See affect of aspect ratio on wing efficiency. And, no, larger diameter does not necessarily mean pitch should be less. Study designs like AMA Limited Penny Plane (12” diameter and 20” pitch is typical; many other examples). Optimal pitch and pitch distribution for a particular design is determined by experimentation.
Good job. Study, study, study and keep asking questions.
Brian T
- CrayolaCrayon
- Member
- Posts: 346
- Joined: October 25th, 2017, 8:24 am
- Division: C
- State: PA
- Has thanked: 16 times
- Been thanked: 5 times
Re: Wright Stuff C
You'll definitely want to max your diameter to the 8 cm limit It's tiny enough as it is
MIT '25
MIT Wright Stuff ES '22
BirdSO Wright Stuff ES '22
MIT Wright Stuff ES '22
BirdSO Wright Stuff ES '22
- xiangyu
- Member
- Posts: 276
- Joined: April 6th, 2019, 8:32 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: MI
- Pronouns: He/Him/His
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 6 times
Re: Wright Stuff C
Hello.AkshayB wrote: ↑July 9th, 2020, 11:46 am Ok, looks like I'm going to have a lot of questions
First off, is the propeller pitch essentially the angle of attack of the propeller blades? So on a Wright Stuff plane, you would have a fixed propeller pitch?
Also what would be benefits/consequences of increasing/decreasing your propeller length. I understand how the tips of a propeller rotate at a faster rpm than at the hub. Would that mean longer propellers would require a lower propeller pitch because the tips would be spinning faster?
Propellers are essentially rotating wings. When a wing moves forward it generates lift, right? Propellers generate "horizontal lift" by rotating. In theory, a variable pitch propeller would be the most efficient, but the WS rules prohibit the use of variable pitch propellers so you don't have to worry about that part.
Like others have said, you want to maximize your propeller diameter as it will be more efficient. As for longer propellers & lower pitch, if you look at propeller designs, you can see that most have a "twist" and the tips will be lower pitch naturally compared to the hub. This is to address that. The pitch your propeller needs will be determined by testing and data. (I suggest start by using Ikara propellers and playing around with the pitch, ultimately you want to match the pitch to rubber to get the most efficiency)
Xiangyu
Medal & Ribbon Count: 33
Former EGRHS Team Captain 2017-2021
https://scioly.org/wiki/index.php/User:Xiangyu
Former EGRHS Team Captain 2017-2021
https://scioly.org/wiki/index.php/User:Xiangyu
- CrayolaCrayon
- Member
- Posts: 346
- Joined: October 25th, 2017, 8:24 am
- Division: C
- State: PA
- Has thanked: 16 times
- Been thanked: 5 times
Re: Wright Stuff C
Torque is the rotational energy exerted by the rubber band, a metric to measure the power the rubber band can exert; More winds = Higher torque. Thicker rubber can take more torque than thinner rubber.
There is a graph called a torque curve; beyond a certain point, for every wind you add, the torque will start to jump up tremendously- that is how you know you are close to the breaking point.
There is a graph called a torque curve; beyond a certain point, for every wind you add, the torque will start to jump up tremendously- that is how you know you are close to the breaking point.
MIT '25
MIT Wright Stuff ES '22
BirdSO Wright Stuff ES '22
MIT Wright Stuff ES '22
BirdSO Wright Stuff ES '22
-
- Coach
- Posts: 667
- Joined: April 24th, 2017, 9:19 am
- Division: B
- State: NM
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 95 times
Re: Wright Stuff C
I'll get a little more detailed than Andrew (Crayola) did, and correct a few terms.
Torque is the "rotational force" provided by the rubber band, to the propeller. You can also measure this rotational force while winding. It is how hard you twist the rubber, or how hard it twists back.
Power is a measure of how this torque is released to produce a positive effect, in this case propelling the plane. Power released by the rubber band is torque times the rotational velocity (RPM). Power to fly the airplane is linear (force to push the plane forward, times velocity of the plane).
Energy is the integrated amount of power stored in the rubber band, or released to move the plane. Conversely, power is how quickly the energy is released or used.
The total energy stored has a direct relationship to the duration of the flight. The power, or rate at which the energy is released, will determine whether the plane climbs or descends, given a reasonable trim condition of the airplane. Torque is an intermediate static value that we can measure, involved in the conversion from stored energy to power to the propeller.
In terms of a rubber powered plane, the Energy stored in the rubber is proportional to the torque and the number of winds. So, more winds means more energy. Higher torque, for a given propeller, means more power because the prop will turn faster (and power is torque times RPM, so power goes up quickly with torque and a fixed pitch prop).
Wider rubber will provide higher torque for a given number of winds, but also will not take as many turns. The maximum energy stored in the rubber will be roughly proportional to the rubber mass. But too wide a piece of rubber will release the energy quickly (more power), climbing quickly and shortening the flight. Too thin, and you will not be able to generate enough power to climb, but the prop will turn much longer (assuming rubber is wound to its full potential). More energy storage requires more rubber mass, which means more lifting force is needed, which also (for a given plane increases drag), and thus increases the power needed to climb.
So, for a given plane, trim condition, ceiling height, etc., there will be a particular optimal rubber mass, width, and launch torque to maximize the flight time.
Hope this helps! Glad to see you asking questions in the summer. Enjoy learning the nuances of indoor freeflight modeling!
Coach Chuck
Torque is the "rotational force" provided by the rubber band, to the propeller. You can also measure this rotational force while winding. It is how hard you twist the rubber, or how hard it twists back.
Power is a measure of how this torque is released to produce a positive effect, in this case propelling the plane. Power released by the rubber band is torque times the rotational velocity (RPM). Power to fly the airplane is linear (force to push the plane forward, times velocity of the plane).
Energy is the integrated amount of power stored in the rubber band, or released to move the plane. Conversely, power is how quickly the energy is released or used.
The total energy stored has a direct relationship to the duration of the flight. The power, or rate at which the energy is released, will determine whether the plane climbs or descends, given a reasonable trim condition of the airplane. Torque is an intermediate static value that we can measure, involved in the conversion from stored energy to power to the propeller.
In terms of a rubber powered plane, the Energy stored in the rubber is proportional to the torque and the number of winds. So, more winds means more energy. Higher torque, for a given propeller, means more power because the prop will turn faster (and power is torque times RPM, so power goes up quickly with torque and a fixed pitch prop).
Wider rubber will provide higher torque for a given number of winds, but also will not take as many turns. The maximum energy stored in the rubber will be roughly proportional to the rubber mass. But too wide a piece of rubber will release the energy quickly (more power), climbing quickly and shortening the flight. Too thin, and you will not be able to generate enough power to climb, but the prop will turn much longer (assuming rubber is wound to its full potential). More energy storage requires more rubber mass, which means more lifting force is needed, which also (for a given plane increases drag), and thus increases the power needed to climb.
So, for a given plane, trim condition, ceiling height, etc., there will be a particular optimal rubber mass, width, and launch torque to maximize the flight time.
Hope this helps! Glad to see you asking questions in the summer. Enjoy learning the nuances of indoor freeflight modeling!
Coach Chuck
- These users thanked the author coachchuckaahs for the post:
- xiangyu (July 21st, 2020, 12:34 pm)
Coach, Albuquerque Area Home Schoolers Flying Events
Nationals Results:
2016 C WS 8th place
2018 B WS 2nd place
2018 C Heli Champion
2019 B ELG 3rd place
2019 C WS Champion
AMA Results: 3 AAHS members qualify for US Jr Team in F1D, 4 new youth senior records
Nationals Results:
2016 C WS 8th place
2018 B WS 2nd place
2018 C Heli Champion
2019 B ELG 3rd place
2019 C WS Champion
AMA Results: 3 AAHS members qualify for US Jr Team in F1D, 4 new youth senior records
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests