Scores

xiangyu · Post by **xiangyu** » Sat Jan 25, 2020 3:14 pm

sciolyperson1 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2020 2:44 pm
lavarball wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2020 9:14 am4.6

Target distance was 9.85, first run, 0.8cm off. Score of 4.6.

Wow. Congrats!

Sciolyperson1's Userpage · Post by **sciolyperson1** » Mon Jan 27, 2020 8:31 pm

For MIT: Can someone confirm that top 6 scores were less than 2-3cm? I heard about it as a rumor, but my intuition makes me believe that 3cm can't be top 6... maybe just top 3?

sdececco · Post by **sdececco** » Tue Jan 28, 2020 5:50 am

sciolyperson1 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 27, 2020 8:31 pm For MIT: Can someone confirm that top 6 scores were less than 2-3cm? I heard about it as a rumor, but my intuition makes me believe that 3cm can't be top 6... maybe just top 3?

I was sitting behind the team that got 6th place at MIT and they said there raw score was an 8.6

Airco2020 · Post by **Airco2020** » Tue Jan 28, 2020 7:49 am

sdececco wrote: ↑Tue Jan 28, 2020 5:50 am
sciolyperson1 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 27, 2020 8:31 pm For MIT: Can someone confirm that top 6 scores were less than 2-3cm? I heard about it as a rumor, but my intuition makes me believe that 3cm can't be top 6... maybe just top 3?
I was sitting behind the team that got 6th place at MIT and they said there raw score was an 8.6

That's crazy! I've got more work to do! For the top teams it's now all about speed.

lavarball · Post by **lavarball** » Tue Jan 28, 2020 7:54 am

Airco2020 wrote: ↑Tue Jan 28, 2020 7:49 am
sdececco wrote: ↑Tue Jan 28, 2020 5:50 am
sciolyperson1 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 27, 2020 8:31 pm For MIT: Can someone confirm that top 6 scores were less than 2-3cm? I heard about it as a rumor, but my intuition makes me believe that 3cm can't be top 6... maybe just top 3?
I was sitting behind the team that got 6th place at MIT and they said there raw score was an 8.6
That's crazy! I've got more work to do! For the top teams it's now all about speed.

They made this event way too simple so there really isnt even a skill gap anymore. You see the most random teams winning just because of the RNG behind it. They might as well switch it's spot with ppp and make it an inquiry. big dumb

mnoga · Post by **mnoga** » Tue Jan 28, 2020 1:04 pm

At the UC Davis Aggie Invitational the top two scores were:

1. Mountain View Gold - 13.2
2. Mountain View Black - 14.4

Run distance was 10.5 and event was run on a tile linoleum floor. I'd call the condition of the floor mediocre at best.

lavarball · Post by **lavarball** » Mon Feb 03, 2020 4:25 am

Top 7 scores at solon were 10 and under...

Userpage · Post by **Unome** » Mon Feb 03, 2020 1:22 pm

lavarball wrote: ↑Mon Feb 03, 2020 4:25 am Top 7 scores at solon were 10 and under...

Yeah, I was wondering. Those scores seemed quite a bit better than I was expecting. Does anyone know what the distance was?

ZanaBanana · Post by **ZanaBanana** » Mon Feb 03, 2020 1:48 pm

Distance was 9.5m at Solon

MoMoney$$$;)0) · Post by **MoMoney$$$;)0)** » Mon Feb 03, 2020 6:28 pm

You have to say though, the score curve was interesting for the invitational since around 10cm would get you around 15th place there, but probably top 10 in other invitationals. But to be fair, if you were used to a good floor, you weren't getting the distance you expected there, since the floor was a piece of garbage; mediocre being a complement.

Scioly.org

Scores

Re: Scores

Re: Scores

Re: Scores

Re: Scores

Re: Scores

Re: Scores

Re: Scores

Re: Scores

Re: Scores

Re: Scores

Connect

Learn

Get Involved

About

Disclaimer