Second place in Div C was 2157.81
6.59 g boom
Holding 14.22 kg
PICTURES, SCORES, VIDEOS!!
-
DarthBuilder
- Member
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2017 8:02 am
- Division: Grad
- State: IL
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: PICTURES, SCORES, VIDEOS!!
Last edited by DarthBuilder on Tue Jun 04, 2019 9:53 am, edited 2 times in total.
Deleted
-
Unome
- Moderator
- Posts: 4321
- Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2014 12:48 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: GA
- Has thanked: 228 times
- Been thanked: 82 times
Re: PICTURES, SCORES, VIDEOS!!
Is it just me or are these scores a little lower than we were expecting?
-
bernard
- Administrator
- Posts: 2498
- Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2014 3:12 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: WA
- Pronouns: He/Him/His
- Has thanked: 184 times
- Been thanked: 783 times
Re: PICTURES, SCORES, VIDEOS!!
When discussing scores please mention which division in your post.
"One of the ways that I believe people express their appreciation to the rest of humanity is to make something wonderful and put it out there." – Steve Jobs
-
dholdgreve
- Coach
- Posts: 573
- Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2006 2:20 pm
- Division: B
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 7 times
Re: PICTURES, SCORES, VIDEOS!!
Honestly, yes... I expected something north of 2400 for B and C to win it.Unome wrote:Is it just me or are these scores a little lower than we were expecting?
Dan Holdgreve
Northmont Science Olympiad
Dedicated to the Memory of Len Joeris
"For the betterment of Science"
Northmont Science Olympiad
Dedicated to the Memory of Len Joeris
"For the betterment of Science"
-
dholdgreve
- Coach
- Posts: 573
- Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2006 2:20 pm
- Division: B
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 7 times
Re: PICTURES, SCORES, VIDEOS!!
I still have not heard what the winners scores were.
Dan Holdgreve
Northmont Science Olympiad
Dedicated to the Memory of Len Joeris
"For the betterment of Science"
Northmont Science Olympiad
Dedicated to the Memory of Len Joeris
"For the betterment of Science"
-
DarthBuilder
- Member
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2017 8:02 am
- Division: Grad
- State: IL
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: PICTURES, SCORES, VIDEOS!!
dholdgreve wrote:I still have not heard what the winners scores were.
Div c winner was around 2250
And I think div b had 2700
Deleted
-
JZhang1
- Member
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2015 11:26 am
- Division: C
- State: NY
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: PICTURES, SCORES, VIDEOS!!
Medalling efficiency for div. C was 1942. To me it seemed like the testing device at nationals was on the slower and bendier side so it would make sense for the scores to be a bit lower. either way everyone shouldve been affected pretty much equally.
Ward Melville High School -> Princeton University
-
sciolyperson1
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 1072
- Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2018 7:13 pm
- Division: C
- State: NJ
- Pronouns: He/Him/His
- Has thanked: 529 times
- Been thanked: 600 times
Re: PICTURES, SCORES, VIDEOS!!
I agree that it was definitely slower - sand was the same though, right?JZhang1 wrote:Medalling efficiency for div. C was 1942. To me it seemed like the testing device at nationals was on the slower and bendier side so it would make sense for the scores to be a bit lower. either way everyone shouldve been affected pretty much equally.
SoCal Planning Team & BirdSO Tournament Director
WW-P HSN '22, Community MS '18
Sciolyperson1's Userpage
WW-P HSN '22, Community MS '18
Sciolyperson1's Userpage
-
DarthBuilder
- Member
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2017 8:02 am
- Division: Grad
- State: IL
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: PICTURES, SCORES, VIDEOS!!
JZhang1 wrote:Medalling efficiency for div. C was 1942. To me it seemed like the testing device at nationals was on the slower and bendier side so it would make sense for the scores to be a bit lower. either way everyone shouldve been affected pretty much equally.
It was definitely slower. Although, I like it a lot more when it’s like this. I’m not sure what you mean by bendier though.
Deleted
Re: PICTURES, SCORES, VIDEOS!!
First post (and maybe last) in a building forum, but this is just because I happen to know what the second place boomilever score for Div. B was. It was around 2700. Low of 2663 and high of 2775. I can't tell you definitively because my teammates said conflicted things on how much their boomilever held, but those are pretty much the scores. I'm not sure if I should give you details about it because boomilever is going to be an event next year and I'm not sure if my teammates would want that information disclosed.