The safest solution is to compress your files and transfer them ahead of time.l0lit wrote:Would external flash drives be allowed in this event? 2.d states that information should be stored so that is offline, therefore I would think so. There was also a rules clarification last year that allowed it, but it has since been deleted.
If a supervisor does not allow it, it might take a long time to be able to clear space and actually transfer the files, time which I may not have. In this case, is it safe to try to debate with the supervisor?
Of course, the safest option would be to manually copy the files right before competition, but considering the size, I would heavily prefer not to.
What do you recommend?
Astronomy C
- Unome
- Moderator
- Posts: 4321
- Joined: January 26th, 2014, 12:48 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: GA
- Has thanked: 228 times
- Been thanked: 82 times
Re: Astronomy C
-
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 619
- Joined: December 3rd, 2011, 9:45 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: NY
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 20 times
- Contact:
Re: Astronomy C
Indeed, but I think what you're looking for is a clarification? Definitely try submitting one regardless (nothing official can be stated here, which is what you'd need if you wanted to argue an ES).Unome wrote:The safest solution is to compress your files and transfer them ahead of time.l0lit wrote:Would external flash drives be allowed in this event? 2.d states that information should be stored so that is offline, therefore I would think so. There was also a rules clarification last year that allowed it, but it has since been deleted.
If a supervisor does not allow it, it might take a long time to be able to clear space and actually transfer the files, time which I may not have. In this case, is it safe to try to debate with the supervisor?
Of course, the safest option would be to manually copy the files right before competition, but considering the size, I would heavily prefer not to.
What do you recommend?
B: Crave the Wave, Environmental Chemistry, Robo-Cross, Meteo, Phys Sci Lab, Solar System, DyPlan (E and V), Shock Value
C: Microbe Mission, DyPlan (Fresh Waters), Fermi Questions, GeoMaps, Grav Vehicle, Scrambler, Rocks, Astro
Grad: Writing Tests/Supervising (NY/MI)
C: Microbe Mission, DyPlan (Fresh Waters), Fermi Questions, GeoMaps, Grav Vehicle, Scrambler, Rocks, Astro
Grad: Writing Tests/Supervising (NY/MI)
- PM2017
- Member
- Posts: 524
- Joined: January 20th, 2017, 5:02 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: CA
- Has thanked: 23 times
- Been thanked: 13 times
Re: Astronomy C
Yes, I think you should do that, especially since last year they released an FAQ clarifying that we could, in fact, use flash drives.syo_astro wrote:Indeed, but I think what you're looking for is a clarification? Definitely try submitting one regardless (nothing official can be stated here, which is what you'd need if you wanted to argue an ES).Unome wrote:The safest solution is to compress your files and transfer them ahead of time.l0lit wrote:Would external flash drives be allowed in this event? 2.d states that information should be stored so that is offline, therefore I would think so. There was also a rules clarification last year that allowed it, but it has since been deleted.
If a supervisor does not allow it, it might take a long time to be able to clear space and actually transfer the files, time which I may not have. In this case, is it safe to try to debate with the supervisor?
Of course, the safest option would be to manually copy the files right before competition, but considering the size, I would heavily prefer not to.
What do you recommend?
West High '19
UC Berkeley '23
Go Bears!
UC Berkeley '23
Go Bears!
- Adi1008
- Moderator
- Posts: 525
- Joined: December 6th, 2013, 1:56 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: CA
- Pronouns: He/Him/His
- Has thanked: 155 times
- Been thanked: 107 times
Re: Astronomy C
Hi all,
dkarkada and I ran Astronomy together at this weekend's UT Invitational. In case any of you are interested, here's the test and the key, which can also be found on his beautiful website.
I am personally quite happy with how the scores turned out and I think that we were able to have a good mix of easy, medium, and difficult questions. Several teams scored extremely highly on the matching/MC sections (perfect scores or near perfect scores), while the FR section towards the end appeared to separate the teams pretty well. In terms of actual numbers:
Maximum possible score: 181
Mean: 82.4
Standard Deviation: 32.3
Sample Size: 19
As always, if you notice any mistakes or have any questions about the test or key, please let us know! And if you are going to the MIT Invitational and doing Astronomy, we'll see you there!
Note (10/30/18): Name pointed out an error in the key for question 43. This has been fixed and the key online has been updated!
dkarkada and I ran Astronomy together at this weekend's UT Invitational. In case any of you are interested, here's the test and the key, which can also be found on his beautiful website.
I am personally quite happy with how the scores turned out and I think that we were able to have a good mix of easy, medium, and difficult questions. Several teams scored extremely highly on the matching/MC sections (perfect scores or near perfect scores), while the FR section towards the end appeared to separate the teams pretty well. In terms of actual numbers:
Maximum possible score: 181
Mean: 82.4
Standard Deviation: 32.3
Sample Size: 19
As always, if you notice any mistakes or have any questions about the test or key, please let us know! And if you are going to the MIT Invitational and doing Astronomy, we'll see you there!
Note (10/30/18): Name pointed out an error in the key for question 43. This has been fixed and the key online has been updated!
Stanford University
University of Texas at Austin '22
Seven Lakes High School '18
Beckendorff Junior High '14
University of Texas at Austin '22
Seven Lakes High School '18
Beckendorff Junior High '14
-
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 518
- Joined: March 5th, 2017, 7:49 pm
- Division: C
- State: NJ
- Pronouns: He/Him/His
- Has thanked: 45 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Astronomy C
Just wondering... do you guys save websites/files on your computer as HTML or PDF files?
West Windsor-Plainsboro High School South '21
2021 Nationals: Astronomy - 1st, Geologic Mapping - 1st, Team - 6th
2021 Nationals: Astronomy - 1st, Geologic Mapping - 1st, Team - 6th
- CrayolaCrayon
- Member
- Posts: 346
- Joined: October 25th, 2017, 8:24 am
- Division: C
- State: PA
- Has thanked: 16 times
- Been thanked: 5 times
Re: Astronomy C
That sounds like a nice idea <_<pb5754[] wrote:Just wondering... do you guys save websites/files on your computer as HTML or PDF files?
MIT '25
MIT Wright Stuff ES '22
BirdSO Wright Stuff ES '22
MIT Wright Stuff ES '22
BirdSO Wright Stuff ES '22
- PM2017
- Member
- Posts: 524
- Joined: January 20th, 2017, 5:02 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: CA
- Has thanked: 23 times
- Been thanked: 13 times
Re: Astronomy C
PDF, but thats only a last resort. Websites (often, not always) have lots of fluff in them, so I try to extract the info and turn it into notes rather than look at entire websites.pb5754[] wrote:Just wondering... do you guys save websites/files on your computer as HTML or PDF files?
West High '19
UC Berkeley '23
Go Bears!
UC Berkeley '23
Go Bears!
- Adi1008
- Moderator
- Posts: 525
- Joined: December 6th, 2013, 1:56 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: CA
- Pronouns: He/Him/His
- Has thanked: 155 times
- Been thanked: 107 times
Re: Astronomy C
This is pretty similar to what my partners and I did for DSO information notes. If I didn't have any time at all, I'd save webpages as PDFs and merge them all into one massive document. Generally, however, I'd add all the important information from each website to my normal notes and copy/paste, reformat, and highlight the original article for good measure. That way, I have a "condensed" portion for each DSO, and an "everything" section in case I'm looking for something obscure.PM2017 wrote:PDF, but thats only a last resort. Websites (often, not always) have lots of fluff in them, so I try to extract the info and turn it into notes rather than look at entire websites.pb5754[] wrote:Just wondering... do you guys save websites/files on your computer as HTML or PDF files?
Stanford University
University of Texas at Austin '22
Seven Lakes High School '18
Beckendorff Junior High '14
University of Texas at Austin '22
Seven Lakes High School '18
Beckendorff Junior High '14
-
- Member
- Posts: 4
- Joined: September 15th, 2017, 7:22 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Astronomy C
Remember that Ctrl+F is always your friend when it comes to DSOs. Still, it's recommended to make things easier on yourself by condensing all of the relevant information that you find on articles and websites.
West High Science Olympiad
-
- Member
- Posts: 4
- Joined: September 15th, 2017, 7:22 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Astronomy C
If you guys don't mind me taking this conversation to more technical areas, there are a few inconsistencies regarding DSO's that I'd like to bring up.
ESO 137-001, for example, has a different constellation depending on the source.
[*]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ESO_137-001
[*]http://chandra.harvard.edu/photo/2014/eso137/
Chandra says Norma while Wikipedia says Triangulum Australe.
In addition, I've also had some difficulties determining the mass for IC 10.
[*]https://arxiv.org/pdf/1708.03634.pdf
[*]https://arxiv.org/pdf/1611.08611.pdf
The first source is a paper that I found online describing the SFR and abundance of WR stars in IC 10. It cites the mass of IC 10 as 7.5 x 10^7 M☉ (2012)
The second source is the paper mentioned in the Chandra article for IC 10. It cites the mass of IC 10 as 2 x 10^7 M☉ (1997).
Any suggestions for what to do?
ESO 137-001, for example, has a different constellation depending on the source.
[*]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ESO_137-001
[*]http://chandra.harvard.edu/photo/2014/eso137/
Chandra says Norma while Wikipedia says Triangulum Australe.
In addition, I've also had some difficulties determining the mass for IC 10.
[*]https://arxiv.org/pdf/1708.03634.pdf
[*]https://arxiv.org/pdf/1611.08611.pdf
The first source is a paper that I found online describing the SFR and abundance of WR stars in IC 10. It cites the mass of IC 10 as 7.5 x 10^7 M☉ (2012)
The second source is the paper mentioned in the Chandra article for IC 10. It cites the mass of IC 10 as 2 x 10^7 M☉ (1997).
Any suggestions for what to do?
West High Science Olympiad
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest