I believe Herpetology was a Trial event in NY if I remember correctly so I beleive that is what they are referring to. For testing, so far out of the two tests I have taken and the one I have written it has all been - - - "Identify the Genus Shown" "Identify the Family shown" "Is this genus opviviaporus?" "Label all the bones in this diagram" "What is the state amphibian of California?" "What environment does this specimen live in?"Froggie wrote:You SHOULD NOT have to distinguish between species and give info about them.matematika wrote:Thank you. I'm a bit confused now. On the handout and old tests, apparently you need to distinguish between different species, but in the FAQ, you really don't need to. Plus, you need to relate species with similar distributions, categorize into venomous vs. nonvenomous, some special features. But where do they get this information? For some of the snakes there is barely any information on the internet. Apparently there was herpetology last year. Can anyone give me a summary of what really goes on in the test (Regionals first, please), and what to really study? I don't quite understand.
For info, I recommend field guides, they have lots of info in one place.
The test is usually stations (there was no herpetology last year), so if you have done invasive species or any other ID event, it should look like that.
If you look at the rules, it tells you what to study.
Also as Froggie said Field Guides are good for testing but it you want to really do well I recommend making your own notes or getting notes from your teammates.
And as I interpret the FAQ about specific species, tests can ask specific questions about species (ie the axolotl) but they would have to say "why is the axolotl important to science?" and not ask you to identify the specimen down to the name axolotl.