I agree that using photogates is somewhat tough for Hovercraft, especially since devices are so prone to rotating/getting stuck along the track this year. Personally, I think that using multiple (~3) manual timers is good enough when other aspects of the event (a quality test, mass score, chart score, etc) should be able to make up for any slight differences in time.Fzxrlz wrote:While rule changes to the hovercraft provide a good platform for development, I am disappointed in the track changes. As a coach & hovercraft event supervisor, I built 4 tracks for B & C Regionals last year. They are useless this year. Even the photogates cannot be reworked with the meandering of the craft. Only Vernier photogates can be adapted which we don't have. I tried to order them, but Vernier only accepts "requests for quotes", not orders. They say they will respond, but haven't.
I think it's possible to get by with a bit less than the maximum. The maximum timed length for Division C is 260 cm, which amounts to a total length of around 310cm (about 5cm over 10 feet). However, rule 5(a) says that the track only has to be at least 215 centimeters (which would be the shortest possible track using a distance of 165 cm). If you use metal studs like these, which are 10 feet (304.8 cm) long, you'd be able to cover nearly every possible length for Division C (94.8%) without needing multiple pieces for the track and still fit the rules.Fzxrlz wrote:The C division tracks have to be 10 to 11 feet to accommodate the variance that can be specified. You can't get materials that long. This means a two piece track (also required to transport it). Now the connection and seam needs to be perfectly sealed and smooth.
Using a gym floor with steel 2x4s does not work in the gyms due to the risk of marring the floor. The website still shows the pre 2017 configuration. Any suggestions?




