Hovercraft B/C

Locked
0ddrenaline
Member
Member
Posts: 136
Joined: May 21st, 2015, 6:36 pm
Division: Grad
State: MI
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 18 times

Re: Hovercraft B/C

Post by 0ddrenaline »

BDake wrote:
chalker wrote:
Ashernoel wrote: The track is just going to change the coefficient of friction. If you test on a track with a different coefficient of friction, which we probably all will because we can't know 100% how he made the track, what the rails were and all the stuff that effects it, you just have to know how to account for different coefficients of friction in your math and calculations. Its a physics event after all ..

It also makes it the most fair if we are kept in the dark about the track until we have to run it. Every team that either checks the forum or not will be on the exact same page
Exactly this ^. I couldn't have said it better.
Lesson learned from States this weekend - just when you think you'd tested as many surfaces you can anticipate for the track, plywood shows up - would have never guessed this to be a possible surface, and cost us dearly. Others clearly pulled it off, so wasn't impossible by any stretch - just circles back to all the real world comments and advice in this forum to be as prepared as possible for variables in the events.
The plywood got us too. For some reason, the hovercraft stopped in the middle of the track on every run. Strange thing, in Michigan: Our middle school had a 1950g craft, was 5 seconds off of 25, and I know they did a decent job on the test. Yet, they didn't place (top 8). In the past, very few teams were able to get near 25 seconds. Must be really competitive now...
Last edited by 0ddrenaline on April 30th, 2017, 2:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Ashernoel
Member
Member
Posts: 345
Joined: January 27th, 2017, 1:31 pm
Division: Grad
State: IL
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Hovercraft B/C

Post by Ashernoel »

0ddrenaline wrote:
BDake wrote:
chalker wrote:
Exactly this ^. I couldn't have said it better.
Lesson learned from States this weekend - just when you think you'd tested as many surfaces you can anticipate for the track, plywood shows up - would have never guessed this to be a possible surface, and cost us dearly. Others clearly pulled it off, so wasn't impossible by any stretch - just circles back to all the real world comments and advice in this forum to be as prepared as possible for variables in the events.
The plywood got us too. For some reason, the hovercraft stopped in the middle of the track on every run. Strange thing, in Michigan: Our middle school had a 1950g craft, was 5 seconds off of 25, and I know they did a decent job on the test. Yet, they didn't place (top 8). Must be really competitive...
thats funny we got almost no points on the testing portion and somehow ended up fifth xD
NT '19
Harvard '23
LittyWap
Member
Member
Posts: 69
Joined: March 22nd, 2017, 1:44 pm
Division: C
State: PA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Hovercraft B/C

Post by LittyWap »

BDake wrote:
chalker wrote:
Ashernoel wrote: The track is just going to change the coefficient of friction. If you test on a track with a different coefficient of friction, which we probably all will because we can't know 100% how he made the track, what the rails were and all the stuff that effects it, you just have to know how to account for different coefficients of friction in your math and calculations. Its a physics event after all ..

It also makes it the most fair if we are kept in the dark about the track until we have to run it. Every team that either checks the forum or not will be on the exact same page
Exactly this ^. I couldn't have said it better.
Lesson learned from States this weekend - just when you think you'd tested as many surfaces you can anticipate for the track, plywood shows up - would have never guessed this to be a possible surface, and cost us dearly. Others clearly pulled it off, so wasn't impossible by any stretch - just circles back to all the real world comments and advice in this forum to be as prepared as possible for variables in the events.
Well, if you had states this weekend, and if your track was plywood..... Awww nice! "Others clearly pulled it off" is talking about me!
Build score of 49.88/50 at Nationals!? Slacker! :evil:

Shady Side Academy Division C

Hovercraft, Thermodynamics, Chemistry Lab, Mat Sci

Big P
MIScioly1
Member
Member
Posts: 128
Joined: April 30th, 2017, 12:27 pm
Division: Grad
State: MI
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Hovercraft B/C

Post by MIScioly1 »

0ddrenaline wrote:
BDake wrote:
chalker wrote:
Exactly this ^. I couldn't have said it better.
Lesson learned from States this weekend - just when you think you'd tested as many surfaces you can anticipate for the track, plywood shows up - would have never guessed this to be a possible surface, and cost us dearly. Others clearly pulled it off, so wasn't impossible by any stretch - just circles back to all the real world comments and advice in this forum to be as prepared as possible for variables in the events.
The plywood got us too. For some reason, the hovercraft stopped in the middle of the track on every run. Strange thing, in Michigan: Our middle school had a 1950g craft, was 5 seconds off of 25, and I know they did a decent job on the test. Yet, they didn't place (top 8). In the past, very few teams were able to get near 25 seconds. Must be really competitive now...
The Hovercraft track was certainly not ideal. The middle of our track had increased friction as well. We were able to get a 20 second run in, however, and I thought the test was very easy. We ended up getting 3rd in the State - our Hovercraft was 1970g.
University of Michigan Science Olympiad Executive Board
User avatar
Unome
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 4323
Joined: January 26th, 2014, 12:48 pm
Division: Grad
State: GA
Has thanked: 228 times
Been thanked: 82 times

Re: Hovercraft B/C

Post by Unome »

MIScioly1 wrote:
0ddrenaline wrote:
BDake wrote:
Lesson learned from States this weekend - just when you think you'd tested as many surfaces you can anticipate for the track, plywood shows up - would have never guessed this to be a possible surface, and cost us dearly. Others clearly pulled it off, so wasn't impossible by any stretch - just circles back to all the real world comments and advice in this forum to be as prepared as possible for variables in the events.
The plywood got us too. For some reason, the hovercraft stopped in the middle of the track on every run. Strange thing, in Michigan: Our middle school had a 1950g craft, was 5 seconds off of 25, and I know they did a decent job on the test. Yet, they didn't place (top 8). In the past, very few teams were able to get near 25 seconds. Must be really competitive now...
The Hovercraft track was certainly not ideal. The middle of our track had increased friction as well. We were able to get a 20 second run in, however, and I thought the test was very easy. We ended up getting 3rd in the State - our Hovercraft was 1970g.
One off of the greatest streak ever :)
Userpage

Opinions expressed on this site are not official; the only place for official rules changes and FAQs is soinc.org.
User avatar
Ashernoel
Member
Member
Posts: 345
Joined: January 27th, 2017, 1:31 pm
Division: Grad
State: IL
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Hovercraft B/C

Post by Ashernoel »

Unome wrote:
MIScioly1 wrote:
0ddrenaline wrote: The plywood got us too. For some reason, the hovercraft stopped in the middle of the track on every run. Strange thing, in Michigan: Our middle school had a 1950g craft, was 5 seconds off of 25, and I know they did a decent job on the test. Yet, they didn't place (top 8). In the past, very few teams were able to get near 25 seconds. Must be really competitive now...
The Hovercraft track was certainly not ideal. The middle of our track had increased friction as well. We were able to get a 20 second run in, however, and I thought the test was very easy. We ended up getting 3rd in the State - our Hovercraft was 1970g.
One off of the greatest streak ever :)
maybe if it had been 1999 it would complete the 2/2/2/2 streak
NT '19
Harvard '23
MIScioly1
Member
Member
Posts: 128
Joined: April 30th, 2017, 12:27 pm
Division: Grad
State: MI
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Hovercraft B/C

Post by MIScioly1 »

Ashernoel wrote:
Unome wrote:
MIScioly1 wrote:
The Hovercraft track was certainly not ideal. The middle of our track had increased friction as well. We were able to get a 20 second run in, however, and I thought the test was very easy. We ended up getting 3rd in the State - our Hovercraft was 1970g.
One off of the greatest streak ever :)
maybe if it had been 1999 it would complete the 2/2/2/2 streak
Who knows :)

We were very prepared for the test, which was too bad because it was certainly the easiest test I have ever taken in Science Olympiad, ever. Basically all we had to do was write Newton's laws, give the unit for energy, and solve for kinetic energy given mass and velocity...
University of Michigan Science Olympiad Executive Board
LittyWap
Member
Member
Posts: 69
Joined: March 22nd, 2017, 1:44 pm
Division: C
State: PA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Hovercraft B/C

Post by LittyWap »

You do realize you can use modeling clay to bring it to max mass during the tournament... -__-
Build score of 49.88/50 at Nationals!? Slacker! :evil:

Shady Side Academy Division C

Hovercraft, Thermodynamics, Chemistry Lab, Mat Sci

Big P
ericlepanda
Member
Member
Posts: 69
Joined: February 9th, 2016, 2:53 pm
Division: C
State: IL
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Hovercraft B/C

Post by ericlepanda »

Ashernoel wrote:
0ddrenaline wrote:
BDake wrote:
Lesson learned from States this weekend - just when you think you'd tested as many surfaces you can anticipate for the track, plywood shows up - would have never guessed this to be a possible surface, and cost us dearly. Others clearly pulled it off, so wasn't impossible by any stretch - just circles back to all the real world comments and advice in this forum to be as prepared as possible for variables in the events.
The plywood got us too. For some reason, the hovercraft stopped in the middle of the track on every run. Strange thing, in Michigan: Our middle school had a 1950g craft, was 5 seconds off of 25, and I know they did a decent job on the test. Yet, they didn't place (top 8). Must be really competitive...
thats funny we got almost no points on the testing portion and somehow ended up fifth xD
On Avogadro, the written test for hovercraft was in the trial events section. Maybe they just threw the test out for some reason.
ntso
quack quack
Tesel
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 161
Joined: January 30th, 2016, 8:03 pm
Division: C
State: MI
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Hovercraft B/C

Post by Tesel »

Unome wrote:
MIScioly1 wrote:
0ddrenaline wrote: The plywood got us too. For some reason, the hovercraft stopped in the middle of the track on every run. Strange thing, in Michigan: Our middle school had a 1950g craft, was 5 seconds off of 25, and I know they did a decent job on the test. Yet, they didn't place (top 8). In the past, very few teams were able to get near 25 seconds. Must be really competitive now...
The Hovercraft track was certainly not ideal. The middle of our track had increased friction as well. We were able to get a 20 second run in, however, and I thought the test was very easy. We ended up getting 3rd in the State - our Hovercraft was 1970g.
One off of the greatest streak ever :)
I firmly believe that there is an alternate universe where us getting 2nd place instead of 3rd is the difference between our team going to Nationals or not, and in that universe, alternate me and alternate MIScioly get 2nd at Nationals.
University of Michigan Science Olympiad Div. C Event Lead

2018 MI Mission Possible State Champions
Locked

Return to “2017 Lab Events”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests