New York 2017
- Clematis
- Member
- Posts: 24
- Joined: December 10th, 2016, 2:03 pm
- Division: C
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: New York 2017
Adding to the fixed team vs swapping out based on results discussion, I'm a fan of having one fixed team throughout the season. While I am of the opinion that inter-team competition for the primary team spots will overall make members try harder, resulting in better results, there's a certain connection that comes from bonding with members of a set team. Even if you don't do well, you had a great time doing it with your friends. As for motivation, going from a middle school that didn't have a fixed team from the beginning to a high school that does, I can say that the perspective shifts from being motivated to want to win for yourself to being motivated to want to win for your team and friends because they're great people that deserve it.
"The most dangerous thing you could've done was give them a glimmer of hope. By letting them see that the impossible was possible, you ignited a fire within them. Now, they know that they can do it, and they won't stop until they have."
- Alex-RCHS
- Member
- Posts: 539
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 3:46 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: NC
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: New York 2017
It seems to me that this debate depends on school culture.
Mix-and-match seems to be a better strategy if:
- your school has a large pool of talented, dedicated students
- your (potential) team has not bonded well yet, and will not object as much to being switched around
- your students are more individually motivated than team-motivated
And keeping one team of 15 seems better if the opposite of those are true.
I think that as long as you give young students a chance to make the states/nationals team later on if they do not in their first or second years of school then it is not cutthroat at all.
Also, I do think that experienced team members should be given the benefit of the doubt if they mess up in an event once or twice, as long as it's not due to lack of effort.
Mix-and-match seems to be a better strategy if:
- your school has a large pool of talented, dedicated students
- your (potential) team has not bonded well yet, and will not object as much to being switched around
- your students are more individually motivated than team-motivated
And keeping one team of 15 seems better if the opposite of those are true.
I think that as long as you give young students a chance to make the states/nationals team later on if they do not in their first or second years of school then it is not cutthroat at all.
Also, I do think that experienced team members should be given the benefit of the doubt if they mess up in an event once or twice, as long as it's not due to lack of effort.
-
- Member
- Posts: 24
- Joined: February 7th, 2016, 7:53 am
- Division: C
- State: NY
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: New York 2017
Does anyone have the results for Adirondack, Capital, and Lower Hudson? Thanks!
EDIT: Division C, obviously
EDIT: Division C, obviously
Captain
Bold indicates main event
2016 Events: Disease Detectives, Dynamic Planet, Forensics, Fossils, Game On, Green Generation, It's About Time
Medal Count: 3
2017 Events: Experimental Design, Game On, Hovercraft, Rocks and Minerals, Herpetology, Wind Power
Medal Count: 3
Bold indicates main event
2016 Events: Disease Detectives, Dynamic Planet, Forensics, Fossils, Game On, Green Generation, It's About Time
Medal Count: 3
2017 Events: Experimental Design, Game On, Hovercraft, Rocks and Minerals, Herpetology, Wind Power
Medal Count: 3
-
- Member
- Posts: 9
- Joined: February 9th, 2009, 3:33 pm
- Division: C
- State: NY
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 5 times
Re: New York 2017
Adirondack Division C results from 2/4 (Scores are for 20 events)
Plattsburgh Orange 31
Lake Placid Blue Bombers A 70
Potsdam Sandstoners 103
Chateaugay Bulldogs 104
Plattsburgh Black 112
Canton Golden Bears 121
Thousand Islands Vikings 121
Carthage Comets 127
Ogdensburg Blue Devils 139
Lake Placid Blue Bombers B 174
Its a small region, Plattsburgh and Lake Placid qualified for the state tournament.
Plattsburgh Orange 31
Lake Placid Blue Bombers A 70
Potsdam Sandstoners 103
Chateaugay Bulldogs 104
Plattsburgh Black 112
Canton Golden Bears 121
Thousand Islands Vikings 121
Carthage Comets 127
Ogdensburg Blue Devils 139
Lake Placid Blue Bombers B 174
Its a small region, Plattsburgh and Lake Placid qualified for the state tournament.
-
- Member
- Posts: 3
- Joined: January 29th, 2017, 4:25 pm
- Division: C
- State: NY
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: New York 2017
Does anyone have a list of all the teams that qualified for C division states?
2017:
MIT/Mentor/UPenn/Regionals/States/Nats?
MatSci: 11/1/18/1/-/-
Remote: 18/3/7/1/-/-
Towers: 34 (don't break it the night before competition)/7/3/2/-/-
Fermi: 4/-/-/1/-/-
MIT/Mentor/UPenn/Regionals/States/Nats?
MatSci: 11/1/18/1/-/-
Remote: 18/3/7/1/-/-
Towers: 34 (don't break it the night before competition)/7/3/2/-/-
Fermi: 4/-/-/1/-/-
- gneissisnice
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 930
- Joined: March 11th, 2008, 9:10 am
- Division: Grad
- State: NY
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 13 times
Re: New York 2017
Plus, I'm teaching there now and I'm assistant coach to the team, so there's thatJust wanted to point out that HHE has been in the top five for four of the last five years and the top ten six of the last eight. Both of the misses were 11th place, so I'm not sure HHE is such a dark horse for top ten. Everybody likes to talk about momentum, but reversion to the mean is more common statistically.
![Razz :P](./images/smilies/icon_razz.gif)
2009 events:
Fossils: 1st @ reg. 3rd @ states (stupid dinosaurs...) 5th @ nats.
Dynamic: 1st @ reg. 19thish @ states, 18th @ nats
Herpetology (NOT the study of herpes): NA
Enviro Chem: 39th @ states =(
Cell Bio: 9th @ reg. 18th @ nats
Remote: 6th @ states 3rd @ Nats
Ecology: 5th @ Nats
Fossils: 1st @ reg. 3rd @ states (stupid dinosaurs...) 5th @ nats.
Dynamic: 1st @ reg. 19thish @ states, 18th @ nats
Herpetology (NOT the study of herpes): NA
Enviro Chem: 39th @ states =(
Cell Bio: 9th @ reg. 18th @ nats
Remote: 6th @ states 3rd @ Nats
Ecology: 5th @ Nats
-
- Member
- Posts: 1388
- Joined: February 5th, 2006, 7:06 am
- Division: Grad
- State: NY
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 3 times
Re: New York 2017
Here: http://www.newyorkscioly.org/wp-content ... es-pdf.pdfCNYSciOlyGuy wrote:Does anyone have a list of all the teams that qualified for C division states?
Re: New York 2017
Do you guys think FM has a chance of going to nationals after the results from UPenn?
https://www.ezratech.us/competition/uni ... -c/results
https://www.ezratech.us/competition/uni ... -c/results
- Adi1008
- Moderator
- Posts: 525
- Joined: December 6th, 2013, 1:56 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: CA
- Pronouns: He/Him/His
- Has thanked: 152 times
- Been thanked: 107 times
Re: New York 2017
IndubitablySneaky wrote:Do you guys think FM has a chance of going to nationals after the results from UPenn?
https://www.ezratech.us/competition/uni ... -c/results
Stanford University
University of Texas at Austin '22
Seven Lakes High School '18
Beckendorff Junior High '14
University of Texas at Austin '22
Seven Lakes High School '18
Beckendorff Junior High '14
- gneissisnice
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 930
- Joined: March 11th, 2008, 9:10 am
- Division: Grad
- State: NY
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 13 times
Re: New York 2017
Possibly, but those scores aren't really anything to write home about. It looks like the competition was fierce, which is definitely a big part of it, but a score of 194 is meh. Looks like the next NY team was Ward Melville and they were 3 places away with only a 20 point difference, which is a small enough gap that anything could happen at states. Even just one place better in each event would have put WM ahead of them.Sneaky wrote:Do you guys think FM has a chance of going to nationals after the results from UPenn?
https://www.ezratech.us/competition/uni ... -c/results
So it's not unlikely, but I don't think the results shed a ton of light on possible States performance.
2009 events:
Fossils: 1st @ reg. 3rd @ states (stupid dinosaurs...) 5th @ nats.
Dynamic: 1st @ reg. 19thish @ states, 18th @ nats
Herpetology (NOT the study of herpes): NA
Enviro Chem: 39th @ states =(
Cell Bio: 9th @ reg. 18th @ nats
Remote: 6th @ states 3rd @ Nats
Ecology: 5th @ Nats
Fossils: 1st @ reg. 3rd @ states (stupid dinosaurs...) 5th @ nats.
Dynamic: 1st @ reg. 19thish @ states, 18th @ nats
Herpetology (NOT the study of herpes): NA
Enviro Chem: 39th @ states =(
Cell Bio: 9th @ reg. 18th @ nats
Remote: 6th @ states 3rd @ Nats
Ecology: 5th @ Nats
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest