Pictures, Videos, and Scores

Random Human
Member
Member
Posts: 153
Joined: August 26th, 2016, 11:39 am
Division: C
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0
Contact:

Re: Pictures, Videos, and Scores

Post by Random Human »

Hey can anyone post some pictures of high scoring tower so I can compare my tower and get some ideas to building towers.
Buckcatcher
Member
Member
Posts: 3
Joined: August 16th, 2015, 6:45 pm
Division: Grad
State: OH
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Pictures, Videos, and Scores

Post by Buckcatcher »

Random Human wrote:Hey can anyone post some pictures of high scoring tower so I can compare my tower and get some ideas to building towers.
Photos of successful towers. Note that bracing is different on each.
tower1.jpg
tower2.jpg
tower3.jpg
User avatar
windu34
Staff Emeritus
Staff Emeritus
Posts: 1384
Joined: April 19th, 2015, 6:37 pm
Division: Grad
State: FL
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 42 times

Re: Pictures, Videos, and Scores

Post by windu34 »

Buckcatcher wrote:
Random Human wrote:Hey can anyone post some pictures of high scoring tower so I can compare my tower and get some ideas to building towers.
Photos of successful towers. Note that bracing is different on each.tower1.jpgtower2.jpgtower3.jpg
lol
noobforce
Member
Member
Posts: 70
Joined: March 14th, 2012, 3:13 pm
Division: C
State: NJ
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Pictures, Videos, and Scores

Post by noobforce »

Those towers have different forces though. Those towers are meant to resist lateral tension, while our Science Olympiad towers are meant to resist downward compression. The designs of teach tower would be different.
Random Human
Member
Member
Posts: 153
Joined: August 26th, 2016, 11:39 am
Division: C
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0
Contact:

Re: Pictures, Videos, and Scores

Post by Random Human »

To be honest, I don't think the people making those tower were really concerned about the weight of the tower- meaning they have an infinite supply of STEEL to use and pretty much don't even have a challenge having the tower go under downwards compression- these were designed to keep wind from blowing the tower over.
So with this being said
Does anyone have any photos of high scoring towers in the competition?
User avatar
bernard
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 2632
Joined: January 5th, 2014, 3:12 pm
Division: Grad
State: WA
Pronouns: He/Him/His
Has thanked: 207 times
Been thanked: 862 times
Contact:

Re: Pictures, Videos, and Scores

Post by bernard »

Random Human wrote:To be honest, I don't think the people making those tower were really concerned about the weight of the tower- meaning they have an infinite supply of STEEL to use and pretty much don't even have a challenge having the tower go under downwards compression- these were designed to keep wind from blowing the tower over.
So with this being said
Does anyone have any photos of high scoring towers in the competition?
I'm sure thought goes into efficiency (i.e. weight of tower, amount of material used). Regardless, if you aren't sure where to start, why not start with a tower inspired by the designs posted but without the extraneous components? This is science--experiment and share your findings!
"One of the ways that I believe people express their appreciation to the rest of humanity is to make something wonderful and put it out there." – Steve Jobs
Random Human
Member
Member
Posts: 153
Joined: August 26th, 2016, 11:39 am
Division: C
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0
Contact:

Re: Pictures, Videos, and Scores

Post by Random Human »

bernard wrote:
Random Human wrote:To be honest, I don't think the people making those tower were really concerned about the weight of the tower- meaning they have an infinite supply of STEEL to use and pretty much don't even have a challenge having the tower go under downwards compression- these were designed to keep wind from blowing the tower over.
So with this being said
Does anyone have any photos of high scoring towers in the competition?
I'm sure thought goes into efficiency (i.e. weight of tower, amount of material used). Regardless, if you aren't sure where to start, why not start with a tower inspired by the designs posted but without the extraneous components? This is science--experiment and share your findings!
I have built a couple towers but the issue now is I want some photo of scioly towers so I can get some ideas to improve my tower and compare mine to yours. Find my flaws and improve myself.
So can anybody post a picture of a decent tower?
User avatar
windu34
Staff Emeritus
Staff Emeritus
Posts: 1384
Joined: April 19th, 2015, 6:37 pm
Division: Grad
State: FL
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 42 times

Re: Pictures, Videos, and Scores

Post by windu34 »

Random Human wrote:
bernard wrote:
Random Human wrote:To be honest, I don't think the people making those tower were really concerned about the weight of the tower- meaning they have an infinite supply of STEEL to use and pretty much don't even have a challenge having the tower go under downwards compression- these were designed to keep wind from blowing the tower over.
So with this being said
Does anyone have any photos of high scoring towers in the competition?
I'm sure thought goes into efficiency (i.e. weight of tower, amount of material used). Regardless, if you aren't sure where to start, why not start with a tower inspired by the designs posted but without the extraneous components? This is science--experiment and share your findings!
I have built a couple towers but the issue now is I want some photo of scioly towers so I can get some ideas to improve my tower and compare mine to yours. Find my flaws and improve myself.
So can anybody post a picture of a decent tower?
This is a good one
Attachments
Case2Figure1.jpg
User avatar
Unome
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 4414
Joined: January 26th, 2014, 12:48 pm
Division: Grad
State: GA
Has thanked: 302 times
Been thanked: 120 times

Re: Pictures, Videos, and Scores

Post by Unome »

windu34 wrote:
Random Human wrote:
bernard wrote: I'm sure thought goes into efficiency (i.e. weight of tower, amount of material used). Regardless, if you aren't sure where to start, why not start with a tower inspired by the designs posted but without the extraneous components? This is science--experiment and share your findings!
I have built a couple towers but the issue now is I want some photo of scioly towers so I can get some ideas to improve my tower and compare mine to yours. Find my flaws and improve myself.
So can anybody post a picture of a decent tower?
This is a good one
Here's an example of a Tower more suited to this year's rules:
Image
Random Human
Member
Member
Posts: 153
Joined: August 26th, 2016, 11:39 am
Division: C
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0
Contact:

Re: Pictures, Videos, and Scores

Post by Random Human »

windu34 wrote:
Random Human wrote:
bernard wrote: I'm sure thought goes into efficiency (i.e. weight of tower, amount of material used). Regardless, if you aren't sure where to start, why not start with a tower inspired by the designs posted but without the extraneous components? This is science--experiment and share your findings!
I have built a couple towers but the issue now is I want some photo of scioly towers so I can get some ideas to improve my tower and compare mine to yours. Find my flaws and improve myself.
So can anybody post a picture of a decent tower?
This is a good one
Hey windu34
Thanks for posting your tower.
My question now is: How much did that tower weigh and how much did it hold. Also, what division are you in?
Locked

Return to “Towers B/C”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests