Hovercraft B/C
- bernard
- Administrator
- Posts: 2479
- Joined: January 5th, 2014, 3:12 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: WA
- Pronouns: He/Him/His
- Has thanked: 181 times
- Been thanked: 760 times
- Contact:
Hovercraft B/C
Hovercraft Wiki, MagLev Wiki (similar)
Hovercraft Test Exchange 2017
Hovercraft Image Gallery, MagLev Image Gallery (similar)
Past Threads: 2011 (as MagLev C), 2012 (as MagLev C), 2013 (as MagLev C), 2014 (as MagLev C)
Past Question Marathons: 2014 (as MagLev C)
Hovercraft Test Exchange 2017
Hovercraft Image Gallery, MagLev Image Gallery (similar)
Past Threads: 2011 (as MagLev C), 2012 (as MagLev C), 2013 (as MagLev C), 2014 (as MagLev C)
Past Question Marathons: 2014 (as MagLev C)
"One of the ways that I believe people express their appreciation to the rest of humanity is to make something wonderful and put it out there." – Steve Jobs
-
- Member
- Posts: 2107
- Joined: January 9th, 2009, 7:30 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: OH
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 56 times
Re: Hovercraft B/C
FYI, there is a different Hovercraft thread where we discussed this already. Here's my post, which should help:rvonhof wrote:Does anyone know of a good place to buy relatively cheap motors for an event like this, hopefully a place more concrete than ebay auctions?
http://scioly.org/phpBB3/viewtopic.php? ... 4&start=75#
Note: The linked thread discusses details from proposed rules. Always consult final rules when preparing for competitions.
Last edited by bernard on September 12th, 2016, 9:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: See note.
Reason: See note.
Student Alumni
National Event Supervisor
National Physical Sciences Rules Committee Chair
-
- Member
- Posts: 2107
- Joined: January 9th, 2009, 7:30 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: OH
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 56 times
Re: Hovercraft B/C
FYI, we just posted the Hovercraft clarification about brushless motors:
https://www.soinc.org/official_rules_clarif
https://www.soinc.org/official_rules_clarif
Student Alumni
National Event Supervisor
National Physical Sciences Rules Committee Chair
- windu34
- Staff Emeritus
- Posts: 1382
- Joined: April 19th, 2015, 6:37 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: FL
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 37 times
Re: Hovercraft B/C
So I have managed to levitate a craft of the max weight with pretty low friction with the ground, but I cant seem to figure out the propulsion aspect. Of course propelling a craft with relatively low mass (and thus inertia) isn't all that complicated, can someone work out the CFM requirements and/or explain how to calculate the propulsion fan requirements for a 2kg mass?
Boca Raton Community High School Alumni
University of Florida Science Olympiad Co-Founder
Florida Science Olympiad Board of Directors
kevin@floridascienceolympiad.org || windu34's Userpage
University of Florida Science Olympiad Co-Founder
Florida Science Olympiad Board of Directors
kevin@floridascienceolympiad.org || windu34's Userpage
-
- Member
- Posts: 2107
- Joined: January 9th, 2009, 7:30 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: OH
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 56 times
Re: Hovercraft B/C
If you have very low friction, then the most fundamental of Physics equations applies: F=ma. Figure out the acceleration you want based upon the track length and target time, plug in 2kg for mass, and that tells you the force the fan needs to exert. To find out the thrust of a fan, you need to know the mass flow rate (CFM) through it and the velocity. Nasa has a good page explaining that here: http://wright.nasa.gov/airplane/propth.htmlwindu34 wrote:So I have managed to levitate a craft of the max weight with pretty low friction with the ground, but I cant seem to figure out the propulsion aspect. Of course propelling a craft with relatively low mass (and thus inertia) isn't all that complicated, can someone work out the CFM requirements and/or explain how to calculate the propulsion fan requirements for a 2kg mass?
Student Alumni
National Event Supervisor
National Physical Sciences Rules Committee Chair
-
- Member
- Posts: 37
- Joined: May 20th, 2013, 10:23 am
- Division: B
- State: AZ
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Hovercraft B/C
I am not sure that I follow rule 6.e. where a penalty is applied to the timing score of any run that has a competition violation. All the competition violations that I see result in a failed run (i.e. TS = 0) so what are the competition violations that don't cause a failed run and would trigger this rule ?
-
- Member
- Posts: 2107
- Joined: January 9th, 2009, 7:30 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: OH
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 56 times
Re: Hovercraft B/C
That's kinda our catch all way of ensuring we didn't miss anything. One example might include touching the vehicle during a succesfull run (5.m.)PHXcoach wrote:I am not sure that I follow rule 6.e. where a penalty is applied to the timing score of any run that has a competition violation. All the competition violations that I see result in a failed run (i.e. TS = 0) so what are the competition violations that don't cause a failed run and would trigger this rule ?
Student Alumni
National Event Supervisor
National Physical Sciences Rules Committee Chair
-
- Member
- Posts: 37
- Joined: May 20th, 2013, 10:23 am
- Division: B
- State: AZ
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Hovercraft B/C
Ok - catch all makes sense.chalker wrote:That's kinda our catch all way of ensuring we didn't miss anything. One example might include touching the vehicle during a succesfull run (5.m.)PHXcoach wrote:I am not sure that I follow rule 6.e. where a penalty is applied to the timing score of any run that has a competition violation. All the competition violations that I see result in a failed run (i.e. TS = 0) so what are the competition violations that don't cause a failed run and would trigger this rule ?
BTW I thought that touching the vehicle is an unsuccessful run according to 5.m. so does not hit this catch all.
-
- Member
- Posts: 2107
- Joined: January 9th, 2009, 7:30 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: OH
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 56 times
Re: Hovercraft B/C
No. You have to parse that sentence carefully. It's saying yo can't touch it until it passes the finish line or is declared a failed run. It's NOT saying that if you touch it the supervisor declares it a failed run.PHXcoach wrote: BTW I thought that touching the vehicle is an unsuccessful run according to 5.m. so does not hit this catch all.
Student Alumni
National Event Supervisor
National Physical Sciences Rules Committee Chair
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest