Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C
- blindmewithscience
- Member
- Posts: 44
- Joined: October 2nd, 2014, 8:57 pm
- Division: C
- State: NV
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C
Hmm, so if speed will need to be emphasized this year, what are the best designs for being fast while still retaining a high level of accuracy?
Nevada state SO occurs on tau/2 day. Support the correct mathematical constant with all tauists.
http://www.tauday.com/tau-manifesto
Event: Regional/States
Astronomy: x/:(
Bungee: 3/3
Compound Machines: x/1
TPS: x/:(
http://www.tauday.com/tau-manifesto
Event: Regional/States
Astronomy: x/:(
Bungee: 3/3
Compound Machines: x/1
TPS: x/:(
-
- Coach
- Posts: 345
- Joined: March 11th, 2014, 12:00 pm
- Division: C
- State: FL
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 21 times
Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C
blindmewithscience wrote:Hmm, so if speed will need to be emphasized this year, what are the best designs for being fast while still retaining a high level of accuracy?
Accuracy is more important this year, but I believe that there will be a greater separation in the times it will take teams to get the ratios. I do not think we are going to see much of an overall increase in the accuracy of the devices (but, I have been surprised before).
All of the devices are basically going to work the same way because of the class of levers we have to use in this event. The "devil is in the details" for this event. Figuring out ways to quickly and consistently get your measurements and then creating fast calculations is where a majority of the time preparing for this event should be spent.
- Unome
- Moderator
- Posts: 4323
- Joined: January 26th, 2014, 12:48 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: GA
- Has thanked: 229 times
- Been thanked: 82 times
Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C
That is the most informative statement I have ever heard about this eventJonB wrote:blindmewithscience wrote:Hmm, so if speed will need to be emphasized this year, what are the best designs for being fast while still retaining a high level of accuracy?
Accuracy is more important this year, but I believe that there will be a greater separation in the times it will take teams to get the ratios. I do not think we are going to see much of an overall increase in the accuracy of the devices (but, I have been surprised before).
All of the devices are basically going to work the same way because of the class of levers we have to use in this event. The "devil is in the details" for this event. Figuring out ways to quickly and consistently get your measurements and then creating fast calculations is where a majority of the time preparing for this event should be spent.
- raxu
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 41
- Joined: October 9th, 2014, 6:54 pm
- Division: C
- State: NY
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C
Quick Question: How much do you usually need to get for top scores in states for Compound Machines? The maximum is 100, but the U.S. record is probably at most 99... 12 seconds and 1.25% error? I'm not doing that...
Richard
Events done Div. B: Simple Machines , Shock Value.
Events done Div. C: Astronomy , It's About Time, Forensics, Optics, Remote Sensing, Game On, Materials Science, Mousetrap Vehicle, Fermi Questions, Thermodynamics.
Events done Div. B: Simple Machines , Shock Value.
Events done Div. C: Astronomy , It's About Time, Forensics, Optics, Remote Sensing, Game On, Materials Science, Mousetrap Vehicle, Fermi Questions, Thermodynamics.
- raxu
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 41
- Joined: October 9th, 2014, 6:54 pm
- Division: C
- State: NY
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C
Also, what is the intended way of putting the 1st class + 2nd class lever? I was thinking about "abandoning" the second class lever - connect it to the fructum and just use the 1st class one, because that sounds 10 times simpler in math. But is there like a nifty design with those 2 levers that can just do the ratio in 1 go?
Richard
Events done Div. B: Simple Machines , Shock Value.
Events done Div. C: Astronomy , It's About Time, Forensics, Optics, Remote Sensing, Game On, Materials Science, Mousetrap Vehicle, Fermi Questions, Thermodynamics.
Events done Div. B: Simple Machines , Shock Value.
Events done Div. C: Astronomy , It's About Time, Forensics, Optics, Remote Sensing, Game On, Materials Science, Mousetrap Vehicle, Fermi Questions, Thermodynamics.
- chinesesushi
- Member
- Posts: 259
- Joined: September 17th, 2013, 4:57 pm
- Division: C
- State: CA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 13 times
Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C
The changed it this year, but last year it was essentially just finding the ratio between 2 of them, so and that took the best teams ~15-25 seconds with varying degrees of accuracy. Top team had accuracy of ~1.5% and a time around ~22 s.raxu wrote:Quick Question: How much do you usually need to get for top scores in states for Compound Machines? The maximum is 100, but the U.S. record is probably at most 99... 12 seconds and 1.25% error? I'm not doing that...
There is no "intended way," but they have to be connected in series to each other. So the output of the 1st class lever must be in the input of the 2nd class lever. Or vice-versa. Rule 3a: The device must be a class 1 lever connected directly in series to a class 2 lever, each with a single beam of length less than or equal to 40.0 cm. So you can't just "abandon" the second class lever, or else they would have just called the event Simple Machines and have it be the same as the Div. B event.raxu wrote:Also, what is the intended way of putting the 1st class + 2nd class lever? I was thinking about "abandoning" the second class lever - connect it to the fructum and just use the 1st class one, because that sounds 10 times simpler in math. But is there like a nifty design with those 2 levers that can just do the ratio in 1 go?
Never argue with an idiot, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience.
Before you criticize a man, walk a mile in his shoes. That way you'll be a mile away and he'll be shoeless.
You should only create problems, that only you know solutions to.
Before you criticize a man, walk a mile in his shoes. That way you'll be a mile away and he'll be shoeless.
You should only create problems, that only you know solutions to.
- Unome
- Moderator
- Posts: 4323
- Joined: January 26th, 2014, 12:48 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: GA
- Has thanked: 229 times
- Been thanked: 82 times
Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C
At Booth Invitational last year, we got ~95 and the top team got ~98 I think (Auburn JHS, 5th in that event at Nats). But you're Div C, so the scores will probably be closer to 96-ish. It depends on what state you're in.raxu wrote:Quick Question: How much do you usually need to get for top scores in states for Compound Machines? The maximum is 100, but the U.S. record is probably at most 99... 12 seconds and 1.25% error? I'm not doing that...
-
- Coach
- Posts: 345
- Joined: March 11th, 2014, 12:00 pm
- Division: C
- State: FL
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 21 times
Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C
raxu wrote: But is there like a nifty design with those 2 levers that can just do the ratio in 1 go?
The design of the levers will not be that much different from team to team. There will be some teams who will figure out how to determine the ratios in "1 go", but this is extremely difficult. Although the devices might be the similar, how the teams use the device will vary.
-
- Member
- Posts: 2107
- Joined: January 9th, 2009, 7:30 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: OH
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 56 times
Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C
Also note 5.d. that talks about making an honest attempt to utilize a compound lever....chinesesushi wrote: Rule 3a: The device must be a class 1 lever connected directly in series to a class 2 lever, each with a single beam of length less than or equal to 40.0 cm. So you can't just "abandon" the second class lever, or else they would have just called the event Simple Machines and have it be the same as the Div. B event.
Student Alumni
National Event Supervisor
National Physical Sciences Rules Committee Chair
-
- Member
- Posts: 70
- Joined: October 1st, 2012, 5:56 pm
- Division: B
- State: KS
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C
So, i made a normal lever with the fulcrum in the middle, and now me and my dad can't really figure out how to find the ratio of two weights, help?
State:
Anatomy: 2nd
Meteorology: 2nd
Simple Machines: 2nd
Solar System: 2nd
Notice a pattern
Anatomy: 2nd
Meteorology: 2nd
Simple Machines: 2nd
Solar System: 2nd
Notice a pattern
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests