![Embarrassed :oops:](./images/smilies/icon_redface.gif)
Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C
-
- Member
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2014 12:28 pm
- Division: B
- State: PA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C
Sorry for double posting, but when they say MA, do they usually tend to say IMA or AMA? Sorry if it's a stupid question. ![Embarrassed :oops:](./images/smilies/icon_redface.gif)
![Embarrassed :oops:](./images/smilies/icon_redface.gif)
My first year doing Science Olympiad!! Love it! ![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
Regionals (2014): Metric Mastery-1st
Sounds of Music-1st
Shock Value-4th
States (2014): Metric Mastery-3rd
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
Regionals (2014): Metric Mastery-1st
Sounds of Music-1st
Shock Value-4th
States (2014): Metric Mastery-3rd
Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C
First of all, this could vary on the question so always use your best judgement. The normal definition of "mechanical advantage" is the measure of force amplification - so this is essentially the same as AMA, the ratio of force out to force in. However, oftentimes if they are not bothering to specify AMA or IMA they will be talking about an ideal machine, with no friction, so IMA=AMA=MA.bzc11 wrote:Sorry for double posting, but when they say MA, do they usually tend to say IMA or AMA? Sorry if it's a stupid question.
If your intuition fails you, these are potentially decent guidelines: If they ask you about mechanical advantage and give you distance data, use IMA. If they give you force data, use AMA. If it is a multiple choice relating to the definition, go with the force definition.
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 4315
- Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2014 12:48 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: GA
- Has thanked: 218 times
- Been thanked: 75 times
Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C
Did you medal? (I'm betting on 1-6 place for that time)bzc11 wrote:Hi, I'm doing it at states, and my partner and I can average around 18-20 seconds.
-
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 9:52 am
- Division: B
- State: MD
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C
Does anyone else feel like the Nats test for SM was too easy? That was the general consensus between my teammate and I, so I'm just wondering what the other teams thought.
"Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us." -Calvin and Hobbes, Bill Watterson
I got my quote from a comic book. Tells you a lot about me, doesn't it?
I got my quote from a comic book. Tells you a lot about me, doesn't it?
-
- Member
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2012 7:19 pm
- Division: C
- State: NY
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C
I did find it quite easy, but somehow I messed up on the lever trying to move very quickly, and I don't know what I did ![Sad :(](./images/smilies/icon_e_sad.gif)
![Sad :(](./images/smilies/icon_e_sad.gif)
Looking forward to anatomy, protein, fossils, and optics (NYS trial) this year!
-
- Member
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 4:07 pm
- Division: C
- State: PA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C
What kind of times were you guys getting at nationals? What was the fastest you heard of?
-
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 9:52 am
- Division: B
- State: MD
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C
My team took 22 seconds and got 18th place. I dunno about the top 10, but I'm guessing 10-15 seconds... I do know that one of the proctors commented that our device was fast. However, he might have just been being nice, plus we were in one of the earlier time blocks.
"Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us." -Calvin and Hobbes, Bill Watterson
I got my quote from a comic book. Tells you a lot about me, doesn't it?
I got my quote from a comic book. Tells you a lot about me, doesn't it?
-
- Coach
- Posts: 343
- Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 12:00 pm
- Division: C
- State: FL
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 21 times
Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C
We had 22 seconds, a weight of 1006g and 8th place overall. We are pretty certain the unknown mass was ~1000g because they used two lead ingots.Algorhythmic wrote:What kind of times were you guys getting at nationals? What was the fastest you heard of?
-
- Member
- Posts: 91
- Joined: Tue Mar 26, 2013 4:58 pm
- Division: C
- State: PA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C
I got in the 830s for my answer and got 26 seconds. My overall place was 4.
-
- Member
- Posts: 80
- Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 11:22 pm
- Division: C
- State: MN
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C
I am pretty sure the weight is around 1020 grams, and i got 1024 in 18 seconds. Failed the test i think, so got 13th.