You bring up an interesting point on the cheat sheets. Honestly, I don't exactly understand the point of them, since you can easily just put all your info on the sheet rather than studying for hours to memorize them.
I do enjoy making them though.

All I can say is look at the microscope again. It takes a decent microscope adequately focused to see what you need to differentiate them. It's pretty rare to get a decent focused microscope at competitions prior to State, in my experience. However, if you do get a good microscope, it's pretty easy and obvious.ak12 wrote:Hello! Does anyone have a definite way to distinguish between cat, dog, and human hair? I know that cat hair is supposedly the finest and dog hair is the roughest and most rigid and I even know what they are supposed to look like under a microscope(cat - supposed to look like its braided, dog - supposed to look like "flakes" are coming off of it, human - most even). Unfortunately, all the hairs look the same to our team under a microscope and the physical properties can usually only be used when comparing all three. Is there any way you guys know of?
Do you know about what magnification would be required to see the differences? Would 400x be enough? I know we have compound microscopes in our school that reach 400x... Thanks a lot!cupcakegirl wrote:All I can say is look at the microscope again. It takes a decent microscope adequately focused to see what you need to differentiate them. It's pretty rare to get a decent focused microscope at competitions prior to State, in my experience. However, if you do get a good microscope, it's pretty easy and obvious.ak12 wrote:Hello! Does anyone have a definite way to distinguish between cat, dog, and human hair? I know that cat hair is supposedly the finest and dog hair is the roughest and most rigid and I even know what they are supposed to look like under a microscope(cat - supposed to look like its braided, dog - supposed to look like "flakes" are coming off of it, human - most even). Unfortunately, all the hairs look the same to our team under a microscope and the physical properties can usually only be used when comparing all three. Is there any way you guys know of?
400x is way more than enough. You should be able to see differences with 40xak12 wrote:Do you know about what magnification would be required to see the differences? Would 400x be enough? I know we have compound microscopes in our school that reach 400x... Thanks a lot!cupcakegirl wrote:All I can say is look at the microscope again. It takes a decent microscope adequately focused to see what you need to differentiate them. It's pretty rare to get a decent focused microscope at competitions prior to State, in my experience. However, if you do get a good microscope, it's pretty easy and obvious.ak12 wrote:Hello! Does anyone have a definite way to distinguish between cat, dog, and human hair? I know that cat hair is supposedly the finest and dog hair is the roughest and most rigid and I even know what they are supposed to look like under a microscope(cat - supposed to look like its braided, dog - supposed to look like "flakes" are coming off of it, human - most even). Unfortunately, all the hairs look the same to our team under a microscope and the physical properties can usually only be used when comparing all three. Is there any way you guys know of?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests