Scrambler C

Locked
nxtscholar
Member
Member
Posts: 261
Joined: November 14th, 2013, 6:25 pm
Division: Grad
State: NJ
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Scrambler C

Post by nxtscholar »

First, let me get out that I don't care about this rule; I didn't see it to be a challenge.

Now, I mean honestly, I thought the intent was to provide a challenge in some way or form (although obviously, there are loopholes). But if the intention was to prevent the damage of the floors being used, then I have to say, that is to me sheer idiocy. Most launchers are made of rigid material and quite often can have nails and other rough objects sticking out of them. Even if the weights hit the launcher and not the floor, isn't there still a considerable amount of force to do damage anyways? If anything, if that was their concern, then reduce the maximum weight limit.
wjnewhouse
Member
Member
Posts: 11
Joined: February 3rd, 2013, 6:09 pm
Division: Grad
State: MN
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Scrambler C

Post by wjnewhouse »

joeyjoejoe wrote:Wow, with a run time of 1.4 seconds, I wonder what kind of stopping accuracy you have. Its got to be light and movin' fast so I imagine you'd have to factor in a lot of skid.

We get around 3 seconds pretty consistently so we'd have to get over 8cm closer than you to compensate for a speed like that.
Well, without giving too much away, yes, we had to factor in a lot of variables that arose with a faster launcher. We had to spend over 9 hours the day before state (staying at school past midnight) working on improving our distance score. I'd prefer not to say what distances we are getting, but I'll say that there's a compromise between speed and accuracy and you just have to find out what works for you.
Now, I mean honestly, I thought the intent was to provide a challenge in some way or form (although obviously, there are loopholes). But if the intention was to prevent the damage of the floors being used, then I have to say, that is to me sheer idiocy. Most launchers are made of rigid material and quite often can have nails and other rough objects sticking out of them. Even if the weights hit the launcher and not the floor, isn't there still a considerable amount of force to do damage anyways? If anything, if that was their concern, then reduce the maximum weight limit.
I think the reasoning for the rule is to prevent damage to the floor; I don't see why they'd put this rule in as some sort of challenge, as it wouldn't really challenge the science/physics of the Scrambler. I can definitely see why they'd put this rule in protect the floors. My old launcher was denting our school's floor whenever we tested, so we put a piece of carpet underneath the weight and it stopped the dents. No other parts of our launchers or any launchers I have seen have damaged the floors with any "nails and other rough objects sticking out of them".
Alumni of Mounds View HS, MN

Check out the University of Minnesota Gopher Invite for Div B!

Past Events: Air Trajectory (2015 Nats: 2nd), Bungee Drop (2014 Nats: 7th), Circuit Lab, Elastic Launched Glider, Electric Vehicle (2016 Nats: 1st), Geocaching, Remote Sensing, Scrambler (2015 Nats: 4th)
nxtscholar
Member
Member
Posts: 261
Joined: November 14th, 2013, 6:25 pm
Division: Grad
State: NJ
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Scrambler C

Post by nxtscholar »

I don't know. If you were to build some platform to intercept and prevent the weight from hitting the floor, you'd lose some gravitational potential energy. The general observation I made was that not many people thought of using paper (myself included) because we had no idea what our state coordinator wanted.

It's amazing how many people used ramp launchers at states.
Cheese_Muffin_Man
Member
Member
Posts: 179
Joined: April 11th, 2011, 4:20 pm
Division: C
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Scrambler C

Post by Cheese_Muffin_Man »

nxtscholar wrote:I don't know. If you were to build some platform to intercept and prevent the weight from hitting the floor, you'd lose some gravitational potential energy. The general observation I made was that not many people thought of using paper (myself included) because we had no idea what our state coordinator wanted.

It's amazing how many people used ramp launchers at states.
Were those people tiered?
nxtscholar
Member
Member
Posts: 261
Joined: November 14th, 2013, 6:25 pm
Division: Grad
State: NJ
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Scrambler C

Post by nxtscholar »

I'll put it this way. Only 7 out of the 26 teams that competed weren't tiered. 8th place used a ramp and got tiered two. So yeah, quite a bit of building infractions.

It was just as comical as it was heartbreaking to see teams spend minutes trying to "fix" a problem that could never be solved. :(
Cheese_Muffin_Man
Member
Member
Posts: 179
Joined: April 11th, 2011, 4:20 pm
Division: C
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Scrambler C

Post by Cheese_Muffin_Man »

nxtscholar wrote:I'll put it this way. Only 7 out of the 26 teams that competed weren't tiered. 8th place used a ramp and got tiered two. So yeah, quite a bit of building infractions.

It was just as comical as it was heartbreaking to see teams spend minutes trying to "fix" a problem that could never be solved. :(
Wow. That's kinda surprising
vince21298
Member
Member
Posts: 3
Joined: October 6th, 2012, 11:27 am
Division: C
State: LA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Scrambler C

Post by vince21298 »

Can you describe your launchers?
nxtscholar
Member
Member
Posts: 261
Joined: November 14th, 2013, 6:25 pm
Division: Grad
State: NJ
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Scrambler C

Post by nxtscholar »

I used a pulley launcher, 3 pulleys. I mean, to be honest, looking at youtube videos of previous scramblers helped me a lot. You get to see a lot of different designs and take the best features out of each one, and add your own ideas.
User avatar
jacobxc
Member
Member
Posts: 101
Joined: November 30th, 2011, 4:15 am
Division: C
State: TX
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Scrambler C

Post by jacobxc »

wjnewhouse wrote: we were able to get a run time of 1.4 seconds at state
I don't think this time is possible. Because if my math is right that is a speed of 1278mph.
Real atheletes run miles not yards
iwonder
Admin Emeritus
Admin Emeritus
Posts: 1115
Joined: May 10th, 2011, 8:25 pm
Division: Grad
State: TX
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Scrambler C

Post by iwonder »

I'm that's definitely some weird math :P

It's 5.7 m/s, which amounts to 12.8mph

(8m/1.4s = 5.7m/s | 5.7m/s = 12.8mph)
'If you're the smartest person in the room, you're in the wrong room' - Unknown
Locked

Return to “2014 Build Events”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests