Mission Possible C
-
- Member
- Posts: 175
- Joined: August 11th, 2012, 5:17 pm
- Division: C
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
-
- Member
- Posts: 13
- Joined: November 17th, 2013, 5:31 pm
- Division: C
- State: CA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Mission Possible C
Just wondering, is salt dissolving in water a chemical or physical change? And what would the explanation be? I'm thinking about using the dissolving as a chemical change, but this whole thing is probably going to end up too controversial to risk it.
-
- Member
- Posts: 175
- Joined: August 11th, 2012, 5:17 pm
- Division: C
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Mission Possible C
I believe that's chemical- justification being that there are different substance(s) after the reaction than before, e.g. Salt changes into two ions, which seem to clearly be different substances (different structure, properties, etc).
If you're worried, I would bring sources that define dissolution as a chemical change (I've seen them) and show them to the supervisor if it's an issue.
If you're worried, I would bring sources that define dissolution as a chemical change (I've seen them) and show them to the supervisor if it's an issue.
-
- Member
- Posts: 3
- Joined: February 9th, 2014, 1:26 pm
- Division: C
- State: CO
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Mission Possible C
This is a chemcial change because there is a reaction taking place. The salt (NaCl) dissolves or dissociates... NaCl(s) -> Na+(aq) + Cl-(aq)themaker wrote:Just wondering, is salt dissolving in water a chemical or physical change? And what would the explanation be? I'm thinking about using the dissolving as a chemical change, but this whole thing is probably going to end up too controversial to risk it.
Ok so rule 4b says that a transfer, to earn points, must be a different transfer than previously scored ones. This means that if you have two tranfers, both say mechanical to electrical, only one counts, right?
-
- Member
- Posts: 2107
- Joined: January 9th, 2009, 7:30 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: OH
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 56 times
Re: Mission Possible C
MP Fan wrote:Chalker, two questions about containers...
1. If we have a hole in the bottom of one of our containers, but the objects intended for that container stay within the walls of the container and would remain in that container, even if the container was moved outside of the device, are we ok? The containers would otherwise be identical - same size, shape, and plastic.
2. Is it ok to have things other than air, golf tees, marbles, or paper clips inside the containers? The only thing I can find in the rules about what shouldn't be in the containers is that there's a penalty for each golf tee, marble, and paper clip that is sorted into the wrong container.
Thanks!
I'd think General Rule #2 applies to this... but as always, this isn't the place for official clarifications or comments.
Student Alumni
National Event Supervisor
National Physical Sciences Rules Committee Chair
-
- Member
- Posts: 175
- Joined: August 11th, 2012, 5:17 pm
- Division: C
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Mission Possible C
What do you guys think about moving a barrier to let light through as M-EM?
Also, someone might want to edit the FAQ saying lasers are not allowed because they are not legal components
I think they're still not allowed as was said above, but for a different reason.
Also, someone might want to edit the FAQ saying lasers are not allowed because they are not legal components
I think they're still not allowed as was said above, but for a different reason.
-
- Member
- Posts: 10
- Joined: December 18th, 2011, 1:44 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: GA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Mission Possible C
Sorry to be dense, but what is General Rule #2?chalker wrote:MP Fan wrote:Chalker, two questions about containers...
1. If we have a hole in the bottom of one of our containers, but the objects intended for that container stay within the walls of the container and would remain in that container, even if the container was moved outside of the device, are we ok? The containers would otherwise be identical - same size, shape, and plastic.
2. Is it ok to have things other than air, golf tees, marbles, or paper clips inside the containers? The only thing I can find in the rules about what shouldn't be in the containers is that there's a penalty for each golf tee, marble, and paper clip that is sorted into the wrong container.
Thanks!
I'd think General Rule #2 applies to this... but as always, this isn't the place for official clarifications or comments.
-
- Member
- Posts: 1388
- Joined: February 5th, 2006, 7:06 am
- Division: Grad
- State: NY
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 3 times
Re: Mission Possible C
Paraphrasing: If something is not forbidden, then it is permitted.MP Fan wrote:
Sorry to be dense, but what is General Rule #2?
-
- Member
- Posts: 104
- Joined: January 14th, 2011, 6:45 am
- Division: Grad
- State: NY
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Mission Possible C
I don't see why this wouldn't be allowed. It's no different than closing a switch to allow preexisting electrons to flow through a circuit.olympiaddict wrote:What do you guys think about moving a barrier to let light through as M-EM?
Also, someone might want to edit the FAQ saying lasers are not allowed because they are not legal components
I think they're still not allowed as was said above, but for a different reason.
2014 States: Scrambler-2nd, Mission Possible-2nd, Experimental Design-3rd, Circuit Lab-3rd
2014 Regionals: Scrambler-1st, Mission-1st, Technical Problem Solving-1st, Circuit Lab-1st, Maglev-1st, Bungee Drop-1st
2013 States: Gravity Vehicle-1st, Fermi-8th, Maglev-1st
2014 Regionals: Scrambler-1st, Mission-1st, Technical Problem Solving-1st, Circuit Lab-1st, Maglev-1st, Bungee Drop-1st
2013 States: Gravity Vehicle-1st, Fermi-8th, Maglev-1st
-
- Member
- Posts: 2107
- Joined: January 9th, 2009, 7:30 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: OH
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 56 times
Re: Mission Possible C
FYI, it's a clarification, not a FAQ (they are 2 different things). Regardless, the clarification explicitly says components are permitted as long as they comply with safety requirements. SO has a general laser safety policy, which generally limits the use of lasers overall. No need to explicitly call them out in the clarification then.olympiaddict wrote:What do you guys think about moving a barrier to let light through as M-EM?
Also, someone might want to edit the FAQ saying lasers are not allowed because they are not legal components
I think they're still not allowed as was said above, but for a different reason.
Student Alumni
National Event Supervisor
National Physical Sciences Rules Committee Chair
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests