Flavorflav wrote:From your link: "When zinc is inserted into an acid, the acid begins to eat away at the zinc, releasing hydrogen gas and heat energy. The acid molecules break up into its components: usually hydrogen and other atoms. The process releases electrons." The reaction at the cathode may require electrons, but flipping the switch did not begin the process at the anode. To put it another way, if there were not a pre-existing potential difference, then there would be no electron flow.
If a battery had a pre-existing potential difference, ie. a surplus of electrons, why would that not discharge immediately into any metal objects/ground? Furthermore, why would they even bother putting chemicals into batteries if they didn't provide current only when a load was attached? Why would they not just create a component with two charged electrodes? If the reaction started immediately, then as soon as you assembled a battery, would the chemicals react entirely and become inert? I think this is pretty clear: " Electrons flow from the battery into a wire, and must travel from the negative to the positive terminal for the chemical reaction to take place. That is why a battery can sit on a shelf for a year and still have plenty of power — unless electrons are flowing from the negative to the positive terminal, the chemical reaction does not take place. Once you connect a wire, the reaction starts. The ability to harness this sort of reaction started with the voltaic pile"
From
http://www.chromebattery.com/battery-ki ... eries-work