Boomilever B/C

Locked
noobforce
Member
Member
Posts: 70
Joined: March 14th, 2012, 3:13 pm
Division: C
State: NJ
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Boomilever B/C

Post by noobforce »

thsom wrote:Hey guys, how can I make the base for my boomilever lighter? My base is currently...3-4 grams... Waaaayyyy too excessive... I use one layer of a 3/16 balsa sheet and 2 layers (on either side of the balsa) of 1/16 bass sheet. this base is about 6 cm by 3 cm... This is currently what holds my boom weight from breaking 10 grams...
Curve your tension members inward so that the part where your tensions members touch the base can become smaller. This will allow you to reduce the width of the base.
Balsa Man
Coach
Coach
Posts: 1318
Joined: November 13th, 2008, 3:01 am
Division: C
State: CO
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Boomilever B/C

Post by Balsa Man »

noobforce wrote:
thsom wrote:Hey guys, how can I make the base for my boomilever lighter? My base is currently...3-4 grams... Waaaayyyy too excessive... I use one layer of a 3/16 balsa sheet and 2 layers (on either side of the balsa) of 1/16 bass sheet. this base is about 6 cm by 3 cm... This is currently what holds my boom weight from breaking 10 grams...
Curve your tension members inward so that the part where your tensions members touch the base can become smaller. This will allow you to reduce the width of the base.
I would seriously caution against that approach. Yes, you want the attachment plate/block as small as you can. Yes, with many/most "conventional" designs (i.e., 2 compression members, with the outsides 5cm apart, so the load block sits on them), that means distal ends 5cm apart. but building a bend into tension members is asking for trouble, and means the tension member(s) will need to be heavier than they would if done without a built-in bend.
The tensile force on the tension member(s) will act to pull them straight. As you get toward full load, there's a lot of pull- tensile force - at work. Adding bend to tension will reduce the tension load the member can carry. The only way around that is to make it bigger or denser, to get higher tensile strength. Also, at one end or the other, or both, as the force tries to straighten the t-member out, that will put a "peeling" force on the glue joint - not just pulling along the t-member, but pulling the t-member away fron the glue joint. Glue joint will be much weaker against peeling than in pure (straight) shear.

However, if you angle the t-members so they can run straight- from the narrow separation at the wall to the wider separation at the distal end, you avoid those problems. Yes, to do that, you have to have angled holes/slots/faces in the wall block/plate, and angled pieces on the compression members for the straight t-members to be glued to.

For a wall block/plate - it only needs to be, and you want it only to be big enough to hold the t-member(s) right next to the washer. Think about it - there is a lever effect at work. The bolt holds the center of the block/plate down - acts as a fulcrum. if there is a tension member- let's look at one side - out from the fulcrum(bolt) by just the width of the washer (3/8ths"+), it takes a lot of force- pull- on that t-member to bend the wall block/plate. If you move that t-member out 3cm (1/2 your 6cm width), it takes much less force to bend the wall attachment piece.

The other thing to consider is thickness of that wall piece. With what you describe, it's only 5/16ths" thick. The glue area you have to hold against the t-member(s) being pulled out is limited by that thickness. Thin also bends easier than thicker. If you were to go to like 1/2" thick, with end-grain orientation- grain running perpendicular to the wall, with thin skin wall side, and outside side - 1" (2.5cm) square would be more than enough. "Thin skin" meaning 1/64th - if tou can't get 1/64th, sand down some 1/32nd... It would be a lot stiffer, a lot lighter, and give you a lot more glue strength....
Len Joeris
Fort Collins, CO
soccerkid812
Member
Member
Posts: 169
Joined: December 16th, 2010, 4:43 pm
Division: C
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Boomilever B/C

Post by soccerkid812 »

Does anyone know if about 1g per 45cm, 3/32" by 3/32" bass wood for each tension members will carry to full load?
Balsa Man
Coach
Coach
Posts: 1318
Joined: November 13th, 2008, 3:01 am
Division: C
State: CO
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Boomilever B/C

Post by Balsa Man »

soccerkid812 wrote:Does anyone know if about 1g per 45cm, 3/32" by 3/32" bass wood for each tension members will carry to full load?
Toward the light end of the range, so, probably
Len Joeris
Fort Collins, CO
User avatar
UQOnyx
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 274
Joined: November 28th, 2012, 2:23 pm
Division: C
State: NJ
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Boomilever B/C

Post by UQOnyx »

thsom wrote:Hey guys, how can I make the base for my boomilever lighter? My base is currently...3-4 grams... Waaaayyyy too excessive... I use one layer of a 3/16 balsa sheet and 2 layers (on either side of the balsa) of 1/16 bass sheet. this base is about 6 cm by 3 cm... This is currently what holds my boom weight from breaking 10 grams...
Are you sure you are making the base right too? You can have a super heavy base but if it is not properly made, it will do nothing.
I used Aia's guide http://scioly.org/wiki/index.php/Aia%27 ... Guide#Base to make the base. What you are doing is attaching two triangles to the end of the base as a wedge from the back with a smaller hole in the front.(Think of it as a way too big ball inside a bottle with a small hole so it cant get out, forming an anchor from the back) Also you might want to read the other topic Building a Boomilever in the same forum because it has a lot of tips on making it.
Noor-ul-Iman School

2012 Events:
Forestry
Storm The Castle


2013 Events:
Boomilever
Shock Value
Forestry


I know the voices aren't real, but they have some great ideas..
mrburrito
Member
Member
Posts: 122
Joined: March 4th, 2013, 4:13 pm
Division: B
State: TN
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Boomilever B/C

Post by mrburrito »

My boomilever has a score of 3012.4, but you can't have the pictures. Haha
I bet you had to read this twice

Meliores Sumus Te

Visit my Wiki page: http://scioly.org/wiki/index.php/Mrburrito
fanjiatian
Member
Member
Posts: 244
Joined: March 16th, 2010, 6:46 pm
Division: Grad
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Boomilever B/C

Post by fanjiatian »

mrburrito wrote:My boomilever has a score of 3012.4, but you can't have the pictures. Haha
Lies... jk
Kudos
User avatar
UQOnyx
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 274
Joined: November 28th, 2012, 2:23 pm
Division: C
State: NJ
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Boomilever B/C

Post by UQOnyx »

OMG PLEASE CAN I PLEASE SEE THE THE PICTURES I WILL BUY THEM OMG.

:roll:

I find that hard to believe but hey, you never know. Amazing job if you did though.
Noor-ul-Iman School

2012 Events:
Forestry
Storm The Castle


2013 Events:
Boomilever
Shock Value
Forestry


I know the voices aren't real, but they have some great ideas..
Jdogg
Member
Member
Posts: 169
Joined: May 19th, 2011, 6:00 pm
Division: Grad
State: PA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Boomilever B/C

Post by Jdogg »

mrburrito wrote:My boomilever has a score of 3012.4, but you can't have the pictures. Haha
That would mean you would have to have a boom that weighed less than 5 grams and held 15kg. I don't think that's physically possible (even for B division)..... maybe you got the scoring mixed up??
Harriton Class of 2013
Vice-Deputy of Avionics and Control for Lunar Lion
Assistant Coach of State College High School
mrburrito
Member
Member
Posts: 122
Joined: March 4th, 2013, 4:13 pm
Division: B
State: TN
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Boomilever B/C

Post by mrburrito »

No actually, it is less than five grams, and doesn't hold all fifteen kilograms.
I bet you had to read this twice

Meliores Sumus Te

Visit my Wiki page: http://scioly.org/wiki/index.php/Mrburrito
Locked

Return to “Boomilever B/C”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests