Crime Busters B
-
- Member
- Posts: 6
- Joined: October 14th, 2012, 2:43 pm
- Division: B
- State: NY
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Crime Busters B
That helped a lot. Thanks so much!
You cry, I cry. You laugh, I laugh. You jump off a cliff, I laugh even harder. 

- ragi
- Member
- Posts: 160
- Joined: November 16th, 2011, 6:31 pm
- Division: B
- State: KS
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Crime Busters B
Hey guys I was wondering about how to identify sample fibers?
Do we have to use the burn test or somethingg


Do we have to use the burn test or somethingg

soccer rules
events: Forestry, Metric, Crime Busters, Heredity
go sporting kc!
go chelsea!
events: Forestry, Metric, Crime Busters, Heredity
go sporting kc!
go chelsea!
- computergeek3
- Member
- Posts: 163
- Joined: November 10th, 2009, 12:49 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: PA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Crime Busters B
Are flame tests allowed in B Division? If they are, definitely go with that, but if not, different fibers have different patterns when viewed under a microscope and if I remember correctly, microscopes are provided at competititon (they are for C Division).ragi wrote:Hey guys I was wondering about how to identify sample fibers?![]()
![]()
Do we have to use the burn test or somethingg
If you can't explain it simply, you don't know it well enough. -Albert Einstein
Bayard Rustin Science Olympiad 2010-2014
Pittsburgh Allderdice Assistant Coach
Bayard Rustin Science Olympiad 2010-2014
Pittsburgh Allderdice Assistant Coach
- cupcakegirl
- Member
- Posts: 135
- Joined: June 8th, 2012, 11:16 am
- Division: C
- State: TX
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Crime Busters B
Burn tests are allowed and the proctor should give you matches if they give you a fiber. However, like computergeek3 said, you can use a microscope to identify fibers, although burn tests are far easier. If you can, go for the burn test!ragi wrote:Hey guys I was wondering about how to identify sample fibers?![]()
![]()
Do we have to use the burn test or somethingg

2013 Nationals Results: Water Quality-2nd, Food Science-6th, Crime Busters-13th, Team- 7th
2014 National Results: Water Quality- 7th, Can't Judge A Powder- 6th, Crime Busters- 4th, Heredity- 5th, Team- FIRST!!!
2015 Events: Forensics, Green Generation, Fossils
2014 National Results: Water Quality- 7th, Can't Judge A Powder- 6th, Crime Busters- 4th, Heredity- 5th, Team- FIRST!!!
2015 Events: Forensics, Green Generation, Fossils
- aim4me26
- Member
- Posts: 96
- Joined: April 26th, 2012, 3:58 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: CA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Crime Busters B
ragi wrote:Hey guys I was wondering about how to identify sample fibers?![]()
![]()
Do we have to use the burn test or somethingg
I remember last year my partner and I, as well as the rest of the participants had to use microscopes, but I dunno.
i know that i should be in bed
and its almost 3 am
but when i close my eyes i can only see miles of headlights
fleshing out the distance
and its almost 3 am
but when i close my eyes i can only see miles of headlights
fleshing out the distance
-
- Member
- Posts: 2
- Joined: January 29th, 2013, 11:43 am
- Division: B
- State: VA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Crime Busters B
So we just finished up an Invitational and did terribly.
We had everything we needed for every possible substance, but absolutely NOTHING went right. One material was salt. We were sure it was salt...but no reaction to Iodine. We had a metal that had to be aluminum...had to be! But it couldn't be. Half the clues didn't suggest anybody at all, and the ones that did suggest somebody were evenly divisible so that there was one clue for each suspect. I just went ahead and wrote "the butler did it", since we had no idea who it could possibly be.
Any tips, any tips at all, would be helpful.
We had everything we needed for every possible substance, but absolutely NOTHING went right. One material was salt. We were sure it was salt...but no reaction to Iodine. We had a metal that had to be aluminum...had to be! But it couldn't be. Half the clues didn't suggest anybody at all, and the ones that did suggest somebody were evenly divisible so that there was one clue for each suspect. I just went ahead and wrote "the butler did it", since we had no idea who it could possibly be.
Any tips, any tips at all, would be helpful.
-
- Member
- Posts: 4
- Joined: January 29th, 2013, 10:45 pm
- Division: B
- State: CA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
-
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 948
- Joined: February 8th, 2009, 12:23 pm
- Division: C
- State: IL
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 5 times
Re: Crime Busters B
KingsRanger wrote:So we just finished up an Invitational and did terribly.
We had everything we needed for every possible substance, but absolutely NOTHING went right. One material was salt. We were sure it was salt...but no reaction to Iodine. We had a metal that had to be aluminum...had to be! But it couldn't be. Practice. This event is about DOING, less studying. Use the process in the flow charts, shrink 'em, and dump them on your cheat sheets. That is the most systematic way to ensure success. I never said this was easy. You could follow the flow chart exactly and still run into trouble even when you know what you're IDing is supposed to be gypsum but your tests lead you to believe it's something else. It happens. All you can do is practice.
I'd also worry if your technique is good. You're using small scoops of sample, right?
Half the clues didn't suggest anybody at all, and the ones that did suggest somebody were evenly divisible so that there was one clue for each suspect. I just went ahead and wrote "the butler did it", since we had no idea who it could possibly be. Two points. First, if your ID was all wrong, your clues were wrong. Right? Next, unless there was a butler in the story, don't guess bogus answers (I can't tell). Always put your best foot forward! The best way to make an educated guess is to assume your clues are correct and write a write-up based on who they implicate. If it's nobody or two people, fine! A good supervisor will give you points for a good write-up even if it isn't what they originally intended.
Read SO's fiber notes. It doesn't hold your hand but explains several processes you can use. You may need to Google some examples of what each type of fiber looks like when magnified afterwards.iheartscience wrote:SO I'm having a reaaly hard time identifying fibers, are there are tricks/tips?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests