Gravity Vehicle C

Locked
User avatar
illusionist
Member
Member
Posts: 942
Joined: March 20th, 2010, 4:13 pm
Division: C
State: MI
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Gravity Vehicle C

Post by illusionist »

fishman100 wrote:If you had the chance to test your vehicle on the same location (gym, hallways, etc.) that GV will be held would you test on that surface? I had the opportunity last night and I was DQ'd today for doing so.
What? Do you mean testing on the actual competition area? We've done that before- last year at states, there was a large area of the gym that no one was using, so we blocked off a section and ran our mousetrap vehicle a few minutes before our scheduled run time. The supervisor didn't have a problem with it.
chalker7
Member
Member
Posts: 612
Joined: September 27th, 2010, 5:31 pm
Division: Grad
State: HI
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Gravity Vehicle C

Post by chalker7 »

fishman100 wrote:If you had the chance to test your vehicle on the same location (gym, hallways, etc.) that GV will be held would you test on that surface? I had the opportunity last night and I was DQ'd today for doing so.
I'm curious about the circumstances behind this since there are no written rules banning practicing at the site before the competition. Was that a pre-announced tournament rule or something the event supervisor made up on the spot? Was it an invitational or a regional tournament?
National event supervisor - Wright Stuff, Helicopters
Hawaii State Director
User avatar
fishman100
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 478
Joined: January 28th, 2011, 1:26 pm
Division: Grad
State: VA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Gravity Vehicle C

Post by fishman100 »

chalker7 wrote:
fishman100 wrote:If you had the chance to test your vehicle on the same location (gym, hallways, etc.) that GV will be held would you test on that surface? I had the opportunity last night and I was DQ'd today for doing so.
I'm curious about the circumstances behind this since there are no written rules banning practicing at the site before the competition. Was that a pre-announced tournament rule or something the event supervisor made up on the spot? Was it an invitational or a regional tournament?
From what I heard, they decided to make the "rule" about not testing the morning of competition (this was Regionals). They said that we were "potentially getting an advantage", but isn't testing on the same surface similar to taking a practice test for an event?

Anyways we got 11th; pretty good considering that only 9 teams were in Tier 1.
Langley HS Science Olympiad '15
chalker7
Member
Member
Posts: 612
Joined: September 27th, 2010, 5:31 pm
Division: Grad
State: HI
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Gravity Vehicle C

Post by chalker7 »

fishman100 wrote: From what I heard, they decided to make the "rule" about not testing the morning of competition (this was Regionals). They said that we were "potentially getting an advantage", but isn't testing on the same surface similar to taking a practice test for an event?
Interesting, without hearing from the event supervisor it's impossible to make any sort of a judgement call on the whole situation, but my gut instinct is to say that it's incredibly difficult to enforce violations of a rule that predate the creation of the rule...
National event supervisor - Wright Stuff, Helicopters
Hawaii State Director
Balsa Man
Coach
Coach
Posts: 1318
Joined: November 13th, 2008, 3:01 am
Division: C
State: CO
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Gravity Vehicle C

Post by Balsa Man »

chalker7 wrote:
fishman100 wrote: From what I heard, they decided to make the "rule" about not testing the morning of competition (this was Regionals). They said that we were "potentially getting an advantage", but isn't testing on the same surface similar to taking a practice test for an event?
Interesting, without hearing from the event supervisor it's impossible to make any sort of a judgement call on the whole situation, but my gut instinct is to say that it's incredibly difficult to enforce violations of a rule that predate the creation of the rule...
There's a good discussion over on Towers about this sort of thing - judges making up rules above/beyond/outside "The Rules." The element here, of a "retroactive", pull it out of the air rule is .....inappropriate squared. Among other implications here would seem to be that the team from the school where this floor is (assuming the Tournament was at a school) would have be disqualified if they'd been using that room in the weeks before for testing/development
Len Joeris
Fort Collins, CO
User avatar
sachleen
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 225
Joined: April 10th, 2007, 8:31 pm
Division: Grad
State: CA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 3 times
Contact:

Re: Gravity Vehicle C

Post by sachleen »

Balsa Man wrote:
chalker7 wrote:
fishman100 wrote: From what I heard, they decided to make the "rule" about not testing the morning of competition (this was Regionals). They said that we were "potentially getting an advantage", but isn't testing on the same surface similar to taking a practice test for an event?
Interesting, without hearing from the event supervisor it's impossible to make any sort of a judgement call on the whole situation, but my gut instinct is to say that it's incredibly difficult to enforce violations of a rule that predate the creation of the rule...
There's a good discussion over on Towers about this sort of thing - judges making up rules above/beyond/outside "The Rules." The element here, of a "retroactive", pull it out of the air rule is .....inappropriate squared. Among other implications here would seem to be that the team from the school where this floor is (assuming the Tournament was at a school) would have be disqualified if they'd been using that room in the weeks before for testing/development
That's what I was wondering... How far back would this apply? Just the night before? A week? Month? I think unless the event supervisor is setting up in that area, there should be no problem. I've done this once before with Electric Vehicle. Supervisor came in and told me to leave because he was going to start set up and I did. That was it...
questionguy
Member
Member
Posts: 126
Joined: November 23rd, 2010, 4:29 pm
Division: C
State: VA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Gravity Vehicle C

Post by questionguy »

When trying to account skid, does it increase the further you go, or does it remain constant at any distance?
User avatar
sachleen
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 225
Joined: April 10th, 2007, 8:31 pm
Division: Grad
State: CA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 3 times
Contact:

Re: Gravity Vehicle C

Post by sachleen »

questionguy wrote:When trying to account skid, does it increase the further you go, or does it remain constant at any distance?
Intuitively, I think it would decrease as distance increases but I have no math to back that up.
Balsa Man
Coach
Coach
Posts: 1318
Joined: November 13th, 2008, 3:01 am
Division: C
State: CO
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Gravity Vehicle C

Post by Balsa Man »

sachleen wrote:
questionguy wrote:When trying to account skid, does it increase the further you go, or does it remain constant at any distance?
Intuitively, I think it would decrease as distance increases but I have no math to back that up.
Your intuition is absolutely correct, and aligns with the physics.
The farther it goes, the slower it is going.
The slower it is going, the less energy it has (to be dissapated in braking- to go into skidding if the wheels lock up).
The less energy, the shorter the skid.
Just like in a real car- you slam on the brakes at 90 mph, you skid a long way. Slam them on at 20 mph, you don't skid nearly as far.... :o
Len Joeris
Fort Collins, CO
chillaxitive99
Member
Member
Posts: 1
Joined: January 31st, 2012, 9:55 am
Division: C
State: NM
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Gravity Vehicle C

Post by chillaxitive99 »

State competition is in 3 days and I am in desperate need of help. What do I do?
"I wish I was a woman"
Locked

Return to “2012 Build Events”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest