Gravity Vehicle C
- Frogger4907
- Member

- Posts: 458
- Joined: September 16th, 2010, 11:16 am
- Division: Grad
- State: KS
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Gravity Vehicle C
I wonder if anyone even knows how physics work. Whatever I'm done.
Ornithology State Champion
Gravity Vehicle State Champion
Thermodynamics State Champion
Remote Sensing State Champion
>20 Div C State Medals
Gravity Vehicle State Champion
Thermodynamics State Champion
Remote Sensing State Champion
>20 Div C State Medals
- haverstall
- Member

- Posts: 218
- Joined: February 25th, 2011, 9:52 am
- Division: Grad
- State: MN
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Gravity Vehicle C
If I could add one thing, my team is building a curved ramp, but we've found it basically impossible to replicate b-curve exactly anyway, due to the nature of our resources. We're close, just not perfect. But, just by reading these forums (and physics class), we're not too worried, because as stated previously, any gain in HZ speed is negligible. In the process of brainstorming, we did initially think that the exit HZ speed was greater, but just doing tests of our ramp by changing the curvature of the surface, we found that there really is no large difference in time.
Mounds View Science Olympiad 2008-2012 || 6th, Remote Sensing, 2011 Nationals
Co-Tournament Coordinator of Gopher Science Olympiad Invitational
Co-Chair of Minnesota Science Olympiad Alumni
Co-Tournament Coordinator of Gopher Science Olympiad Invitational
Co-Chair of Minnesota Science Olympiad Alumni
- bearasauras
- Member

- Posts: 410
- Joined: March 4th, 2003, 8:33 pm
- State: CA
- Has thanked: 53 times
- Been thanked: 115 times
- Contact:
Re: Gravity Vehicle C
Hey Frogger, I've taken 1 or 2 physics classes before. I'll do some math when I get the chance (based on this curve here: http://www.scioly.org/phpBB3/viewtopic. ... 75#p181588) and I'll compare that to just a non curved ramp and get back to you.Frogger4907 wrote:I wonder if anyone even knows how physics work. Whatever I'm done.
-
chalker
- Member

- Posts: 2107
- Joined: January 9th, 2009, 7:30 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: OH
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 56 times
Re: Gravity Vehicle C
bearasauras wrote:Hey Frogger, I've taken 1 or 2 physics classes before. I'll do some math when I get the chance (based on this curve here: http://www.scioly.org/phpBB3/viewtopic. ... 75#p181588) and I'll compare that to just a non curved ramp and get back to you.Frogger4907 wrote:I wonder if anyone even knows how physics work. Whatever I'm done.
Only 1 or 2 classes? Is that all it takes to get a Ph.D. in Applied Physics at CalTech nowadays? If so sign me up too!;)
Student Alumni
National Event Supervisor
National Physical Sciences Rules Committee Chair
- Littleboy
- Member

- Posts: 373
- Joined: March 14th, 2010, 4:53 pm
- Division: C
- State: MI
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Gravity Vehicle C
Why so few bear?chalker wrote:bearasauras wrote:Hey Frogger, I've taken 1 or 2 physics classes before. I'll do some math when I get the chance (based on this curve here: http://www.scioly.org/phpBB3/viewtopic. ... 75#p181588) and I'll compare that to just a non curved ramp and get back to you.Frogger4907 wrote:I wonder if anyone even knows how physics work. Whatever I'm done.
Only 1 or 2 classes? Is that all it takes to get a Ph.D. in Applied Physics at CalTech nowadays? If so sign me up too!;)
With the noncurved ramp you are making, make it trasition to the floor smoothly.
- illusionist
- Member

- Posts: 942
- Joined: March 20th, 2010, 4:13 pm
- Division: C
- State: MI
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 1 time
- haverstall
- Member

- Posts: 218
- Joined: February 25th, 2011, 9:52 am
- Division: Grad
- State: MN
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Gravity Vehicle C
I think sarcasm is a dead language nowadays.illusionist wrote:LB, I think bear was joking....
But, to reiterate what LB said, (or at least what I though he said), the curve that bear had wasn't a perfect cycloid, so the transition to the floor would be a bit rough.
Mounds View Science Olympiad 2008-2012 || 6th, Remote Sensing, 2011 Nationals
Co-Tournament Coordinator of Gopher Science Olympiad Invitational
Co-Chair of Minnesota Science Olympiad Alumni
Co-Tournament Coordinator of Gopher Science Olympiad Invitational
Co-Chair of Minnesota Science Olympiad Alumni
-
questionguy
- Member

- Posts: 126
- Joined: November 23rd, 2010, 4:29 pm
- Division: C
- State: VA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Gravity Vehicle C
Considering chassis shape, I am not sure if this has been discussed before I only looked back 4-5 pages on the forum, when creating your chassis is it more effective to create a very long and narrow shape vs. a wide and short shape, or do u want a balance of the two, assuming these are all the same weight. One advantage of the second would be that you would have more space for a wingnut braking system, but that can easily be fixed with the first option as well.
-
chalker7
- Member

- Posts: 612
- Joined: September 27th, 2010, 5:31 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: HI
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Gravity Vehicle C
This has been discussed a little bit earlier (I think), but to summarize:questionguy wrote:Considering chassis shape, I am not sure if this has been discussed before I only looked back 4-5 pages on the forum, when creating your chassis is it more effective to create a very long and narrow shape vs. a wide and short shape, or do u want a balance of the two, assuming these are all the same weight. One advantage of the second would be that you would have more space for a wingnut braking system, but that can easily be fixed with the first option as well.
Short and wide allows you to concentrate more of the mass higher on the ramp (giving you more potential energy), but is less stable/more difficult to get to go straight (because of the short distance between the axles).
Long and narrow will provide more stability, but you will lose some amount of potential energy (and final speed).
If I were building a competitive vehicle, I would build a short and relatively wide vehicle, taking a large amount of care ensuring everything is perfectly square and aligned. Of course, that's just my opinion and I'd be glad to see someone come up with a better solution!
National event supervisor - Wright Stuff, Helicopters
Hawaii State Director
Hawaii State Director
- illusionist
- Member

- Posts: 942
- Joined: March 20th, 2010, 4:13 pm
- Division: C
- State: MI
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Gravity Vehicle C
In relation to that, wouldn't it be best to build the body light, and then add mass in whatever location you want in order to balance a straight path and maximum potential?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests