Gravity Vehicle C

chalker
Member
Member
Posts: 2107
Joined: January 9th, 2009, 7:30 pm
Division: Grad
State: OH
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 56 times

Re: Gravity Vehicle C

Post by chalker »

illusionist wrote:awww man. come on chalker, I expected to build some crazy-complex thing that uses a falling mass that is mounted on the vehicle with like 29 pulleys....
way to rain on my parade =P

Just wanted to point out it's my brother 'chalker7' that's raining on your parade. As for myself, 'chalker', it's always sunny, just like in philly;)

Student Alumni
National Event Supervisor
National Physical Sciences Rules Committee Chair
chalker
Member
Member
Posts: 2107
Joined: January 9th, 2009, 7:30 pm
Division: Grad
State: OH
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 56 times

Re: Gravity Vehicle C

Post by chalker »

hmcginny wrote:any hints on what the scoring will be like? is it just hitting a point as quickly and accurately as possible?

Yes, measurements of various types will be made, and those will go into a formula to calculate the result. Low score wins;)

Student Alumni
National Event Supervisor
National Physical Sciences Rules Committee Chair
User avatar
bearasauras
Member
Member
Posts: 410
Joined: March 4th, 2003, 8:33 pm
State: CA
Has thanked: 53 times
Been thanked: 115 times
Contact:

Re: Gravity Vehicle C

Post by bearasauras »

chalker wrote:
hmcginny wrote:any hints on what the scoring will be like? is it just hitting a point as quickly and accurately as possible?

Yes, measurements of various types will be made, and those will go into a formula to calculate the result. Low score wins;)
Yes, and ideally you'll want your vehicle to go as quickly, as accurately and as close to your predicted time as possible
Last edited by bearasauras on August 29th, 2011, 9:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Luo
Staff Emeritus
Staff Emeritus
Posts: 507
Joined: March 21st, 2011, 1:31 pm
Division: Grad
State: MN
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 13 times

Re: Gravity Vehicle C

Post by Luo »

bearasauras wrote:
chalker wrote:
hmcginny wrote:any hints on what the scoring will be like? is it just hitting a point as quickly and accurately as possible?

Yes, measurements of various types will be made, and those will go into a formula to calculate the result. Low score wins;)
Yes, and ideally you'll want your vehicle to go as quickly, as accurately and as close to your predicted time as possible
Not to mention, heh, that you use gravitational potential energy as the vehicle's sole means of propulsion to reach a Target Point after, in fact, you design, build and test one vehicle and ramp. :P
Proud alumnus of Mounds View High School Science Olympiad, Arden Hills, MN
Co-founder of the MIT Science Olympiad Invitational Tournament: http://scioly.mit.edu/
User avatar
illusionist
Member
Member
Posts: 942
Joined: March 20th, 2010, 4:13 pm
Division: C
State: MI
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Gravity Vehicle C

Post by illusionist »

starpug wrote:Can we all just wait for the rules to come out?
no. we're too excited. not to gain an advantage, but plain excitement
hmcginny
Member
Member
Posts: 100
Joined: February 28th, 2011, 6:27 pm
Division: Grad
State: PA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Gravity Vehicle C

Post by hmcginny »

hahah yeah i was asking just out of pure curiosity and excitement, since the chalkers were answering some general questions.
Harriton 2013 (Captain 2012-2013)
Penn 2017

2014 PA State Compound Machines Supervisor

Past Events: Fermi, Thermo, WIDI, Maglev, TPS, Chem Lab, Mission, Sounds, Trajectory, Mousetrap, etc.
User avatar
sj
Member
Member
Posts: 191
Joined: March 12th, 2009, 7:37 am
Division: C
State: NJ
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Gravity Vehicle C

Post by sj »

Is there any "leaked info" about dimensions and stuff to start prototyping? :D
2011 Nationals Results : Sumo Bots 2nd, Helicopters 4rd, Mission Possible 4th, Towers, 9th
WWP SOUTH 3rd At NATS!!!!!

2012 Events: Robot Arm, Towers, Gravity Vehicle
User avatar
illusionist
Member
Member
Posts: 942
Joined: March 20th, 2010, 4:13 pm
Division: C
State: MI
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Gravity Vehicle C

Post by illusionist »

Posted question already answered. Thus, this post has been deleted.
Flavorflav
Member
Member
Posts: 1388
Joined: February 5th, 2006, 7:06 am
Division: Grad
State: NY
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Gravity Vehicle C

Post by Flavorflav »

chalker7 wrote:
Danny Smith wrote:It seems like there are two ideas about gravity vehicle going around. One idea was that the car would be propelled by a falling mass, presumably pulling a string to turn the wheels. But other sources say like an eggless scrambler. From my kowledge of scramblers, they were pushed by a swinging mass of some kind, but then just coasted. So which is more accurate? Does the power source travel with the car? Just so I can begin to conceptualize some plans.
The second one is closer, but still not quite there. It will be a vehicle travelling down a ramp, propelled solely by its own mass.
Please tell me you are kidding. Everybody has to build ramps? No pulleys, hammers, or springs? Why? Why force everybody into the same cramped shoebox?

I am very, very disappointed. :cry:
chalker7
Member
Member
Posts: 612
Joined: September 27th, 2010, 5:31 pm
Division: Grad
State: HI
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Gravity Vehicle C

Post by chalker7 »

Flavorflav wrote:
chalker7 wrote:
Danny Smith wrote:It seems like there are two ideas about gravity vehicle going around. One idea was that the car would be propelled by a falling mass, presumably pulling a string to turn the wheels. But other sources say like an eggless scrambler. From my kowledge of scramblers, they were pushed by a swinging mass of some kind, but then just coasted. So which is more accurate? Does the power source travel with the car? Just so I can begin to conceptualize some plans.
The second one is closer, but still not quite there. It will be a vehicle travelling down a ramp, propelled solely by its own mass.
Please tell me you are kidding. Everybody has to build ramps? No pulleys, hammers, or springs? Why? Why force everybody into the same cramped shoebox?

I am very, very disappointed. :cry:
Ramp design and construction will be a critical part of the competition. While it may seem very basic, ramp geometry (flat vs. curved and if curved, what shape exactly), material selection (friction, strength and weight will all be considered by top teams), transportation issues (the ramps may be difficult to move, requiring rapid disassembly/reassembly) and the launching/release mechanism all add significant complexity to the event. All of those factors will have to be optimized for you to consider doing well at a state tournament or nationals.

In my mind, one of the key benefits of this event is that it will be very accessible to brand new teams without direction while also offering many factors for optimization. Reducing mechanical complexity does not necessarily mean an event is more "simple," just easier to visualize.

I do not see it as a cramped shoebox at all. By your assumptions, forcing everyone to use mousetraps as the propulsion method for a vehicle is equally cramped. There will be a tremendous amount of variation between teams throughout the year.
National event supervisor - Wright Stuff, Helicopters
Hawaii State Director
Locked

Return to “2012 Build Events”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests