it looks honeycomby enough. >.< but oh well. Yeah, your right.gneissisnice wrote:Also, Favosites is a tabulate coral, not a honeycomb coral.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a21d8/a21d8884cc70c555fb91ae7a3cb390eb0c3d639b" alt="Smile :)"
it looks honeycomby enough. >.< but oh well. Yeah, your right.gneissisnice wrote:Also, Favosites is a tabulate coral, not a honeycomb coral.
WOAH WOAH WOAHCheerwine wrote:Does Fossils at Nationals generally have a better balance between invertebrates and vertebrates? I'm used to state and regional tests which are heavily slanted toward whatever is common in the area; obviously, that means lots of mollusks, sponges, and corals. I was just wondering whether they try a bit harder to incorporate more dinosaurs, fish, etc.
Alternatively, if anyone here is from Illinois: How do the folks at Urbana/Champaign normally approach their Fossils event?
Thanks
The events are based on the National event writers, not the school. The Nationals test last year consisted of 10 or so stations at 6 minutes each, but time was the biggest issue. There were a TON of questions per station, and if you relied on your binder for ID, you'd have no time to answer the questions.Cheerwine wrote:Does Fossils at Nationals generally have a better balance between invertebrates and vertebrates? I'm used to state and regional tests which are heavily slanted toward whatever is common in the area; obviously, that means lots of mollusks, sponges, and corals. I was just wondering whether they try a bit harder to incorporate more dinosaurs, fish, etc.
Alternatively, if anyone here is from Illinois: How do the folks at Urbana/Champaign normally approach their Fossils event?
Thanks
From all the practice tests ive taken (which is like, 5?...), there is a bit on morphology.Cheerwine wrote:lllazar: sorry about the confusion, I'm not actually from Illinois. Our team just won state, so I was asking about nationals. I'll definitely be on this board a lot between now and then, so we'll see.
gneissisnice: thanks for that; sounds like they're going to throw everything but the kitchen sink at us. I suppose the best studying I could do is just memorizing more of the taxonomy at this point (and identifying modes of preservation). Were there many short answer questions asking you to explain broader natural history kinds of things (e.g. how did such and such evolve)? Also, was there a big emphasis on morphology?
If I remember correctly, a lot of it was multiple choice, and most of the fill in was for the ID. I dont remember a big emphasis on morphology, but I was rushed so I don't remember a whole lot of the event.Cheerwine wrote:lllazar: sorry about the confusion, I'm not actually from Illinois. Our team just won state, so I was asking about nationals. I'll definitely be on this board a lot between now and then, so we'll see.
gneissisnice: thanks for that; sounds like they're going to throw everything but the kitchen sink at us. I suppose the best studying I could do is just memorizing more of the taxonomy at this point (and identifying modes of preservation). Were there many short answer questions asking you to explain broader natural history kinds of things (e.g. how did such and such evolve)? Also, was there a big emphasis on morphology?
That station doesn't sound TOO bad...unless the specimens were vague and the prexservations were hard....gneissisnice wrote:If I remember correctly, a lot of it was multiple choice, and most of the fill in was for the ID. I dont remember a big emphasis on morphology, but I was rushed so I don't remember a whole lot of the event.Cheerwine wrote:lllazar: sorry about the confusion, I'm not actually from Illinois. Our team just won state, so I was asking about nationals. I'll definitely be on this board a lot between now and then, so we'll see.
gneissisnice: thanks for that; sounds like they're going to throw everything but the kitchen sink at us. I suppose the best studying I could do is just memorizing more of the taxonomy at this point (and identifying modes of preservation). Were there many short answer questions asking you to explain broader natural history kinds of things (e.g. how did such and such evolve)? Also, was there a big emphasis on morphology?
There was a pretty big emphasis on modes of preservation though, that was a whole 6-minute stations, with around 13 samples you had to match to the preservation type.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests