Search found 5 matches
- March 13th, 2018, 10:48 am
- Forum: Towers B/C
- Topic: Cost
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4191
Re: Cost
The cost depends on what kind of jig you make and what specifications you order for wood. 36" x 1/16" x 1/32" sticks specified to a given amount of pounds per cubic foot cost about $8.25 each from Specialized Balsa, but if you cut your own, the 36" x 4" x 1/32 sheet also specified for density and ...
- January 29th, 2018, 6:46 pm
- Forum: Towers B/C
- Topic: Towers B/C
- Replies: 524
- Views: 148172
Re: Towers B/C
I am not sure if this has been discussed at length this year, but I was wondering about the benefits / downfalls of utilizing a rectangular, bridge-like base rather than the typically square base. This seems especially pertinent because of the wide angle on bonus towers. I have seen some high level ...
- December 20th, 2017, 4:12 pm
- Forum: Towers B/C
- Topic: Wood
- Replies: 40
- Views: 16439
Re: Wood
For estimating the modulus of elasticity, I used an extrapolation equation that I got from an MIT study on balsa properties.
- December 19th, 2017, 9:43 am
- Forum: Towers B/C
- Topic: Wood
- Replies: 40
- Views: 16439
Re: Wood
Regarding the 0.55 multiplier for towers braced with only X's, I ran into a bit of an issue.
One of the towers (Division C) that I built last season used 3/32 inch square main compression members with a mass of 1.6 g per 36" stick. The tower held full 15 kg for about 10 seconds and then shattered ...
One of the towers (Division C) that I built last season used 3/32 inch square main compression members with a mass of 1.6 g per 36" stick. The tower held full 15 kg for about 10 seconds and then shattered ...
- November 24th, 2017, 8:46 pm
- Forum: Towers B/C
- Topic: Wood
- Replies: 40
- Views: 16439
Re: Wood
Balsa Man,
When you say "The effective length factor for all Xs is significantly less; about 0.55.", are you referring to the K value in Euler's Buckling theorem explicitly or to some derivation? If explicitly, then X braces should be much better than X s and ladders because the value is squared ...
When you say "The effective length factor for all Xs is significantly less; about 0.55.", are you referring to the K value in Euler's Buckling theorem explicitly or to some derivation? If explicitly, then X braces should be much better than X s and ladders because the value is squared ...